Heavy weight lower reps VS. Lower weight higher reps
Options
tiggs862017
Posts: 15 Member
So, it's been about 15 years since I was in strength training in highschool. I remember our coach telling us the difference between these two, and that you should alternate between heavy weight low reps and low weight and high reps but I can't remember why, or how often I should alternate. I think heavy weight with low reps gives you bulk, but I'm not for sure. Any input is much appreciated 
0
Replies
-
lower reps higher weight = strength; higher reps lower weight = hypertrophy ...the best programs tend to have you doing a mixture of both, which is why I like the PHUL (Power, Hypertrophy, Upper, Lower split) program...2
-
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.8 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.
This. Though what is the "time" referring to? Time under tension?1 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.
Thank you for sharing this!! It helps tremendously! Do you alternate week to week? One week moderate weight, the next heavy weight?0 -
-
tiggs862017 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.
Thank you for sharing this!! It helps tremendously! Do you alternate week to week? One week moderate weight, the next heavy weight?
i would suggest finding a structured program and following that, instead of trying to design one on your own ..
1 -
tiggs862017 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.
Thank you for sharing this!! It helps tremendously! Do you alternate week to week? One week moderate weight, the next heavy weight?
This is what my current cycle looks like as set up by my trainer...
Week 1
Day 1 – Moderate
Day 2 – Heavy
Week 2
Day 1 - Moderate
Day 2 - Heavy
Week 3
Day 1 - Moderate
Day 2 - Heavy
Week 4
Day 1 - Moderate
Day 2 - Power (all Olympic movements)
Week 5
Day 1 - Very Heavy
Day 2 - Moderate
Week 6
Day 1 - Light weight/high rep
Day 2 - Heavy
0 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.
This. Though what is the "time" referring to? Time under tension?
Actually, no idea...my guess would be time to complete the movement but no idea.0 -
I like to do both and cover all bases. I'll warm up using lower weight and higher reps, as weight increases, reps decrease. Once I'm up to my working set (say 5-8 reps) i'll then drop the weight down and finish with a high rep set or several to failure. I'm looking to progress in weight from the previous week, this is paramount...this is where I believe i'll grow. The high rep set floods the muscle with nutrients (the pump) ready for recovery. There is also a school of thought that heavy weight targets fast twitch muscle fibers and the higher rep stuff targets slow twitch, therefore if you do both you get more bang for your buck although personally I think slowing down the rep itself is more beneficial for hitting slow twitch than a lot of reps at a higher pace.
Also ignore anyone who says heavy weight lower reps isn't beneficial to hypertrophy (because they're just parroting information
). 1 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.
This. Though what is the "time" referring to? Time under tension?
Actually, no idea...my guess would be time to complete the movement but no idea.
So...time under tension1 -
Time spent wondering if you are lifting heavy enough.7
-
cwolfman13 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
I personally don't see any reason to "specialize" in any one rep range...for the most part I do non-linear undulating periodization...basically I have a heavy day and a moderate rep day with higher volume and I just alternate those...as a matter of general fitness and athleticism I think it's best to not live in any one rep range unless you're training for something specific that requires it.
This. Though what is the "time" referring to? Time under tension?
Actually, no idea...my guess would be time to complete the movement but no idea.
So...time under tension
with 1-3 being 4-10
1...2...down and 1 up 1 rack... sounds about right for TuT.0 -
OP, look at the chart and decide your goals. Got fat to lose and muscle to maintain? Choose compound lifts in the strength rep/set range with a few accessories in the hypertrophy range (not completely necessary even). Choose this for a strength goal as well. Want to work on physique? Do strength on your compounds with some extra volume in hypertrophy isolation work.1
-
My opinion is certain movements should be heavy and others lighter (but not light) Squat a HEAVY barbell and trust me, you will grow! Deadlift HEAVY, and you will GROW! Bench press, shoulder press HEAVY! Then all the assistance work you do lighter for higher reps and a lot of volume. Chase the pump.3
-
Eric Helms does a great job of very thoroughly addressing strength, hypertrophy and workout programming for both in his e-book (Muscle and Strength Training Pyramids). It's well worth the read. Here's a video he made which summarizes it, he goes much more in depth in the book:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dl8v6frDJHc 3 -
tempo, that's right0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 911 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions