Calories burned

Options
sabyahmed48
sabyahmed48 Posts: 15 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
Is there any way to track how many calories you burn when lifting weights?

Replies

  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    Search for strength training under cardio
  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    Do you burn enough lifting weights to make it worthwhile?
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    1. There is no accurate way.

    2. There are a number of methods that will give you a meaningless random number. Some of them may be listed in this thread. If you ever want to check whether or not one of these methods "works", refer to statement #1.
  • Misspinklift
    Misspinklift Posts: 384 Member
    MyFitnessPal doesn't show any calories burn when doing strength training, which makes no sense to me because you are.

    There are some accurate way but I find the easiest is to wear a fitness tracker. A lot of a option of strength training, which weight lifting is.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    MyFitnessPal doesn't show any calories burn when doing strength training, which makes no sense to me because you are.

    There are some accurate way but I find the easiest is to wear a fitness tracker. A lot of a option of strength training, which weight lifting is.

    See my previous post. Point #1. Explains everything.
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,865 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    1. There is no accurate way.

    2. There are a number of methods that will give you a meaningless random number. Some of them may be listed in this thread. If you ever want to check whether or not one of these methods "works", refer to statement #1.

    This
  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    1. There is no accurate way.

    2. There are a number of methods that will give you a meaningless random number. Some of them may be listed in this thread. If you ever want to check whether or not one of these methods "works", refer to statement #1.

    That's not exactly true. If you are willing to wear a mask to measure your oxygen consumption while working out you can get a very accurate measure. But most of us don't have access to that capability.
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    1. There is no accurate way.

    2. There are a number of methods that will give you a meaningless random number. Some of them may be listed in this thread. If you ever want to check whether or not one of these methods "works", refer to statement #1.

    That's not exactly true. If you are willing to wear a mask to measure your oxygen consumption while working out you can get a very accurate measure. But most of us don't have access to that capability.

    Well, yeah--I mean everyone has a metabolic cart sitting in their basement. Can't imagine how I could have overlooked that. Heck, I was using mine on the cat this morning. Just forgetful in my old age.

    But, actually--for reasons I will not bother to list unless someone else is interested--just measuring VO2 is not all that accurate when estimating energy expenditure for strength training. Basically, it's the same reason you can't use an HRM or tracker--there is just too much going on physiologically that cannot be reliably and consistently quantified.

    So.....back to #1 which is still the best answer.
  • L1zardQueen
    L1zardQueen Posts: 8,753 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    1. There is no accurate way.

    2. There are a number of methods that will give you a meaningless random number. Some of them may be listed in this thread. If you ever want to check whether or not one of these methods "works", refer to statement #1.

    That's not exactly true. If you are willing to wear a mask to measure your oxygen consumption while working out you can get a very accurate measure. But most of us don't have access to that capability.

    Well, yeah--I mean everyone has a metabolic cart sitting in their basement. Can't imagine how I could have overlooked that. Heck, I was using mine on the cat this morning. Just forgetful in my old age.

    But, actually--for reasons I will not bother to list unless someone else is interested--just measuring VO2 is not all that accurate when estimating energy expenditure for strength training. Basically, it's the same reason you can't use an HRM or tracker--there is just too much going on physiologically that cannot be reliably and consistently quantified.

    So.....back to #1 which is still the best answer.

    I have one of those thingees I'm my basement! Lol
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    MyFitnessPal doesn't show any calories burn when doing strength training, which makes no sense to me because you are.

    There are some accurate way but I find the easiest is to wear a fitness tracker. A lot of a option of strength training, which weight lifting is.

    fitness trackers are not accurate for weight lifting. they can even be off for steady state cardio.
  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    Azdak wrote: »
    Azdak wrote: »
    1. There is no accurate way.

    2. There are a number of methods that will give you a meaningless random number. Some of them may be listed in this thread. If you ever want to check whether or not one of these methods "works", refer to statement #1.

    That's not exactly true. If you are willing to wear a mask to measure your oxygen consumption while working out you can get a very accurate measure. But most of us don't have access to that capability.

    Well, yeah--I mean everyone has a metabolic cart sitting in their basement. Can't imagine how I could have overlooked that. Heck, I was using mine on the cat this morning. Just forgetful in my old age.

    But, actually--for reasons I will not bother to list unless someone else is interested--just measuring VO2 is not all that accurate when estimating energy expenditure for strength training. Basically, it's the same reason you can't use an HRM or tracker--there is just too much going on physiologically that cannot be reliably and consistently quantified.

    So.....back to #1 which is still the best answer.

    I saw something the other day that was showing new technology that might be able to take the measurement with just a face mask device and not require a large piece of equipment, though it still might be something most people would borrow instead of own.
This discussion has been closed.