More calories when sick?
Options
Replies
-
I have a lot of pressure from my parents. They will ask how much I've lost. They will be disappointed and act sad for me if I only lose one pound per week!
I know, I'm 35, what is wrong with me. I guess you never get too old to want your parents approval.....
Ouch Can you explain to them that 1 lb per week is the recommended safe amount to lose? And tell them you're really happy with that because it's more sustainable and increases your odds of keeping the weight off long term?6 -
WinoGelato wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »Wino, if I eat back all my calories as I earn them (which I'm more comfortable with) it's identical to setting it lightly active!
It's fine to do it that way if you're more comfortable, just make sure that you've set MFP to 1lb loss per week so that your deficit isn't too aggressive (ie, you end up 500 cals below your end of day Fitbit total).
I think she is wanting to set her MFP goal at 1746? This is what I’m confused about. Sometimes I think too many data points can be overwhelming and I think that may be what happened here.
I recommend letting MFP set the goal based on current stats and a 1lb/week loss. She wants to go with sedentary and with the FitBit and eating back cals that should be fine.
Nope, I think she's wanting to use that as her baseline sedentary TDEE, subtract a 500 cal deficit, then eat back exercise cals. So basically yes, set at sedentary, eat back cals.2 -
Wino, this is my discussion. Can you please not refer to me like I'm not going to be reading these posts? This reminds me of Seinfeld and the person talking in 3rd person for some reason.....1
-
Sorry we're talking past you, OP!3
-
Yes, Nono is correct.0
-
Wino, this is my discussion. Can you please not refer to me like I'm not going to be reading these posts? This reminds me of Seinfeld and the person talking in 3rd person for some reason.....
Seriously? Sorry the conversation shifted and you felt like we were talking past you. Nony and I are old friends on here and I got the sense she was following your intent better than I was.
Sounds like you’ve got it figured out. Good luck.14 -
-
Thank you for all your help everyone! I appreciate it so much!! I have one more pressing question. Every Sunday, my family and my sister's family go to my mom's house for a big home cooked dinner and dessert. It's such a fun tradition! The meals are cooked from scratch and would be too difficult to track but only losing one pound a week, I could blow my weight loss very easily. Can I save calories during the week? How much would you recommend? One pound doesn't have a lot of wiggle room and feels restricted.1
-
Thank you for all your help everyone! I appreciate it so much!! I have one more pressing question. Every Sunday, my family and my sister's family go to my mom's house for a big home cooked dinner and dessert. It's such a fun tradition! The meals are cooked from scratch and would be too difficult to track but only losing one pound a week, I could blow my weight loss very easily. Can I save calories during the week? How much would you recommend? One pound doesn't have a lot of wiggle room and feels restricted.
Yep, you can absolutely save calories. Hard to know how many without knowing what dinner and dessert consists of, but if you did 100 cals a day, plus ate a bit lighter for your other meals on Sundays, that should give you a decent cushion. After 4-6 weeks, look at your average weekly weight loss, and adjust if necessary.2 -
And that's why you track (more loosely and more inaccurately) but still somewhat track buffet food Generally I do it from pictures of what I put on my plate these days as opposed to trying to come up with entries right there and there.
Some general "idea" that you're there to eat and socialize and enjoy/overindulge on maybe one or two exceptional dishes as opposed to just stuff yourself till you can't move may be a useful construct while actively trying to lose weight.
You can certainly have a maintenance day, for example, on your day at your mom's. At worse that would delay or reduce your weight loss by 15%. If you felt like adding an extra 100 Cal deficit on your other days, then that would spread your 3500 Cal deficit throughout the week (in fact it would turn it into a 3600 Cal deficit; but who's counting!)
However, I would hesitate to make any adjustments that are much bigger than that. You may not be feeling it at this time if you've just started restricting; but, one of the reasons for rebound over-eating is definitely prior over-restricting. And one of the reasons why the end of restriction is so often followed by regain.
Your best long term plan is to try to make things easy enough that you adhere to your plans.
In terms of dealing with over-eating, it probably best to just ignore it and continue with your normal deficit.
Having said that and while I wouldn't go out of my way to reduce calories in response to a high day, I would certainly delay my first meal of the day if I am still feeling full from last night. But I would not delay my second meal even if I wasn't yet feeling it! And if all this led me into having a lower, overall, day and saving maybe an extra 100 Cal... sure, why not. But I would most definitely not go about doubling down on my deficit to expiate my sins of the previous day and trying to catch up with my scheduled deficits... attempting to do so is guaranteed not to end well!5 -
Ok, it took so much willpower but I reduced my weight loss to 1lb per week. I trust you guys! BUT...... It only have me 40 more calories! 😭 I was secretly looking forward to eating a little bit more! Will it up it more in the morning?!1
-
I guess it makes sense but it's not even 3500 more per week. Shouldn't it be 1250? I can't imagine that the people who were up in arms about me eating and 1200 will be happy that I now am allowed 1240 😂1
-
Wino, this is my discussion. Can you please not refer to me like I'm not going to be reading these posts? This reminds me of Seinfeld and the person talking in 3rd person for some reason.....
She was simply trying to help you. @WinoGelato is one of the seasoned with experience posters on this forum! You should be grateful to have her participate as much as she did. Bless you @WinoGelato for being so helpful on this forum. Your posts have been extremely helpful to me!10 -
I guess it makes sense but it's not even 3500 more per week. Shouldn't it be 1250? I can't imagine that the people who were up in arms about me eating and 1200 will be happy that I now am allowed 1240 😂
It's because MFP bottoms out at 1200 for women. So even though you'd picked 2 lb per week, you didn't have enough room from a sedentary setting for a 1000 cal deficit.
Also, we established that you're not actually eating only 1200, because you're eating back the adjustment from Fitbit (which might be bigger now that you've set to 1 lb - on a day like yesterday you'd end up with something in the low 1400s, on a more active day, you'll end up higher than that). People were concerned that you may have picked a goal that was far too aggressive (which you did, but MFP basically stopped you from executing because, as it turns out, a little over 1200 would be right for you if sedentary). We see a lot of people here who are pushing really aggressive deficits initially, not eating back exercise cals despite working out daily, etc, hence the reaction and wanting to make sure yours was actually appropriate for you. It was all from a place of concern and wanting what's best for you If you now say you're set to 1lb per week, and have a base of 1240, plus you eat back your exercise cals, everyone will be fine with that.
This is one of the reasons I suggested setting to lightly active (even though it ends up the same in the end), because that's a truer baseline for you, and isn't quite as depressing as seeing 1200 in your diary first thing in the morning.4 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »I guess it makes sense but it's not even 3500 more per week. Shouldn't it be 1250? I can't imagine that the people who were up in arms about me eating and 1200 will be happy that I now am allowed 1240 😂
It's because MFP bottoms out at 1200 for women. So even though you'd picked 2 lb per week, you didn't have enough room from a sedentary setting for a 1000 cal deficit.
This is one of the reasons I suggested setting to lightly active (even though it ends up the same in the end), because that's a truer baseline for you, and isn't quite as depressing as seeing 1200 in your diary first thing in the morning.
To explain this a tiny bit.
With negative calories enabled it doesn't matter (at midnight) what setting you pick on MFP: sedentary, active or even very active. The "adjustment" at the end of the day will make it so that your total calories (from which MFP subtracts your 500 deficit to come up with your eating target) will be the exact number that Fitbit detected as your expenditure for the day.
But there are vast differences in the various adjustments numbers you would see during the day since they change based on time of day and activity to that point of time. At which point it does become a bit of a mind game as to the times and sizes of adjustments you prefer to see.
Generally speaking and based on what you've said... you will probably end up averaging a TDEE closest to MFP's lightly active setting, i.e. that of someone who averages 4,000 to 7,500 steps during their daily living activities
1 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »Humans reducing calories by 15% got 2 years - "The study found that calorie restriction decreased systemic oxidative stress, which has been tied to age-related neurological conditions such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, as well as cancer, diabetes, and others."
This is important to me. Reducing Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases as well as cancer and diabetes....VERY important but of course, YMMV. In 2001 I had a severe traumatic brain injury and was in a coma for 2 weeks. Subsequently, I was diagnosed with Narcolepsy. My resting heart rate is very slow, it feels like my entire body is slowed bc I'm constantly tired. I'm hypothyroid. I'm short, 5'3. Narcolepsy is thought to slow metabolism, which makes me twice as likely to be obese. Besides being more likely to be obese, having such a severe traumatic brain injury makes me much more likely to develop neurological diseases like Alzheimer's or Parkinson's. Additionally, I had gestational diabetes in 2 of my 3 pregnancies which puts me at a much increased risk of developing diabetes someday.
Reducing your calories by 15%-20% of TDEE is what is typically recommended for safe and healthy weight loss. If you consistently stayed at a 15% deficit from TDEE, you would ultimately wither away and die...so I think there needs to be some context there.
Let's also say your TDEE is a mere 1800 calories which would be about average for a sedentary female but unlikely for someone very overweight or obese...a 15% cut would be 270 calories giving you a target of 1,530 calories. A 20% cut would be a 360 calorie reduction which would give you a target of 1,440 calories. This is why people are questioning whether 1200 is really appropriate...namely it is the lowest default for a women selecting sedentary on MFP and 1.5-2 Lbs per week weight loss target which is a pretty aggressive target. Nobody is saying 1200 calories is wrong in all instances, but it is often overly aggressive and has you starting at the floor of what is considered to be minimum calories for a sedentary female not under medical supervision. A lot of the responses you are getting are from people who've had a lot of success and have a lot of experience using MFP.
Apparently you did not read the post about my health. My metabolism is already low. My TDEE is not an average TDEE
So I’m 5’ 4” F and 156lbs and with PCOS. Apparently I had a slow metabolism but turns out I was wrong! In 2018 I dieted with 1500 calories and lose my sanity. My hair fell out, my muscles hurt, joint pain, constipation, mood swings, got anemic (again) just because of undereating. And I felt fine in the first few months. The reason why I went so low in calories was because I assumed that with PCOS I HAD TO eat between 1200-1500 calories. Now after many months of figuring out my TDEE, through trial and error, I found out it’s around 2350/2450 depending on my activity levels. That’s 500 more than my predicted TDEE of 1900/2000. Undereating is no joke. But you seem like you know what your doing right?3 -
Wino, this is my discussion. Can you please not refer to me like I'm not going to be reading these posts? This reminds me of Seinfeld and the person talking in 3rd person for some reason.....
She was simply trying to help you. @WinoGelato is one of the seasoned with experience posters on this forum! You should be grateful to have her participate as much as she did. Bless you @WinoGelato for being so helpful on this forum. Your posts have been extremely helpful to me!
Awww... thanks! I still try but I admit I’ve grown a little weary...15 -
This is how I coordinated my fitness tracker and MFP:
- I plugged my stats into MFP to lose 1 lb. a week.
- I recalculated for each 10 lb lost (1960 calories to start. Now I am at 1746)
- I set my activity level to sedentary in both MFP and Fitbit (later Garmin)
- I did not enable negative calorie adjustment
- I ate ALL my base MFP calories
- I entered my swimming calories manually since my tracker would only record about 100 "steps" for 90 minutes of laps.
- I let the tracker tell MFP how many extra calories I earned and ate back 50%. I was losing too fast so I raised that to about 80% with some days 100%.
I am now 60 lb. less than I was when I started.
Sometimes too much information can confuse the issue so the most important thing is to trust the numbers and trust the process. Pick one platform to be your main source of daily information (I chose MFP because it is easier) and just use the other for sidebar type info. You do not need to know stuff like BMR to lose, you only really need to know your height, current weight, and age. All else is done for you.
2 -
Wino, this is my discussion. Can you please not refer to me like I'm not going to be reading these posts? This reminds me of Seinfeld and the person talking in 3rd person for some reason.....
She was simply trying to help you. @WinoGelato is one of the seasoned with experience posters on this forum! You should be grateful to have her participate as much as she did. Bless you @WinoGelato for being so helpful on this forum. Your posts have been extremely helpful to me!
Absolutely! I am very grateful. It just felt weird to be talked about like I wasn't there? I wasn't angry, I just wanted wino to direct questions at me.2 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »I guess it makes sense but it's not even 3500 more per week. Shouldn't it be 1250? I can't imagine that the people who were up in arms about me eating and 1200 will be happy that I now am allowed 1240 😂
It's because MFP bottoms out at 1200 for women. So even though you'd picked 2 lb per week, you didn't have enough room from a sedentary setting for a 1000 cal deficit.
Also, we established that you're not actually eating only 1200, because you're eating back the adjustment from Fitbit (which might be bigger now that you've set to 1 lb - on a day like yesterday you'd end up with something in the low 1400s, on a more active day, you'll end up higher than that). People were concerned that you may have picked a goal that was far too aggressive (which you did, but MFP basically stopped you from executing because, as it turns out, a little over 1200 would be right for you if sedentary). We see a lot of people here who are pushing really aggressive deficits initially, not eating back exercise cals despite working out daily, etc, hence the reaction and wanting to make sure yours was actually appropriate for you. It was all from a place of concern and wanting what's best for you If you now say you're set to 1lb per week, and have a base of 1240, plus you eat back your exercise cals, everyone will be fine with that.
This is one of the reasons I suggested setting to lightly active (even though it ends up the same in the end), because that's a truer baseline for you, and isn't quite as depressing as seeing 1200 in your diary first thing in the morning.
It's motivating to me! Makes me want to get more steps to get more flexibility in my diet!2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 911 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions