Myfitnesspal

Message Boards MFP Suggestions/Feedback
You are currently viewing the message boards in:

Help! Inappropriate Friend Requests Pics

12627283032

Replies

  • robertw486robertw486 Member, Greeter, Premium Posts: 2,179 Member Member, Greeter, Premium Posts: 2,179 Member
    laurennportillo
    guitarblade1994
    Sylkie101
    Jf897
    lindanr85
    belkisferrera
    ecse331
    stevenlloydsmith2
    Jaxtart
    inexile14
    dpilkscimone
    lialalayther
    ivanavila86
    jamesscott40
    danka030305
    dillonw19
    Jewsed
    scullinane1
    dhenriot
    kaesskhan786
    aschubertreyes
    forgottenrobot
    janellecarpio
    swissgirl519
    shauna11870
    kblechl1
    lightshade1017
    Ellissa028
    TonyLucas16
    alysha_debeul
    oertelg
    alanajunee
    jazingek
    lllbender
    thehoenysoemarto
    jburck0517
    tititness
    mudit8888
    curtknazick
    ryanfallon2121
    dannyesl90
    meesh815
    Devious_Nige
    warlock_fire01
    msum86
    madsgoldbach
    lpbynum4037
    CharliesGrandma01
    brandon41700
    leslieinhb
    mesaly
    asmaahus
    georgenafelicia
    jiweon1116
    maciejlemanski
    Djsrcy01
    mbrandonking
    kvercelli1336
    Barbp05
    smc7496
    clance6545
    scullinane1
    isaacphoi
    androlol
    panthers0319
    angelicatorres351377
    karamason3413
    mbagis
    pretty_dany27
    mariedibble
    Heroblind
    trianim352


  • foreverslim1111foreverslim1111 Member Posts: 2,282 Member Member Posts: 2,282 Member
    Pasting this request here: Sadiax 5 would like to become friends.

    I will be going through my friends list and deleting any that are old, out of touch ones also.
  • snowflake954snowflake954 Member Posts: 6,359 Member Member Posts: 6,359 Member
    robertw486 wrote: »
    laurennportillo
    guitarblade1994
    Sylkie101
    Jf897
    lindanr85
    belkisferrera
    ecse331
    stevenlloydsmith2
    Jaxtart
    inexile14
    dpilkscimone
    lialalayther
    ivanavila86
    jamesscott40
    danka030305
    dillonw19
    Jewsed
    scullinane1
    dhenriot
    kaesskhan786
    aschubertreyes
    forgottenrobot
    janellecarpio
    swissgirl519
    shauna11870
    kblechl1
    lightshade1017
    Ellissa028
    TonyLucas16
    alysha_debeul
    oertelg
    alanajunee
    jazingek
    lllbender
    thehoenysoemarto
    jburck0517
    tititness
    mudit8888
    curtknazick
    ryanfallon2121
    dannyesl90
    meesh815
    Devious_Nige
    warlock_fire01
    msum86
    madsgoldbach
    lpbynum4037
    CharliesGrandma01
    brandon41700
    leslieinhb
    mesaly
    asmaahus
    georgenafelicia
    jiweon1116
    maciejlemanski
    Djsrcy01
    mbrandonking
    kvercelli1336
    Barbp05
    smc7496
    clance6545
    scullinane1
    isaacphoi
    androlol
    panthers0319
    angelicatorres351377
    karamason3413
    mbagis
    pretty_dany27
    mariedibble
    Heroblind
    trianim352


    Good hunting!
  • joyystick3joyystick3 Member Posts: 41 Member Member Posts: 41 Member
    @6monthstilmarch

    Sent me a link to a sexchat website and said she has been on it herself. Not sure about this one folks.

  • Diatonic12Diatonic12 Member Posts: 26,636 Member Member Posts: 26,636 Member
    There's nothing new under the sun, joyystick3 and that includes the side hustle. Sugar will kick that to the curb.
  • snowflake954snowflake954 Member Posts: 6,359 Member Member Posts: 6,359 Member
    aidenconnor1303
    katzel1314
    smadewes98
    seanbrennan2015
    tylerv_work
    richardwrenn10
    tobiaji1
    stevenlloydsmith2
    libcmin
    mthracol77
    T3mmiHu8
    Jaxtart
    mfp_erasder
    rbsb0227
    akwypych
    ufogirl95
    serre61
    ecse331
    lilbil6014
    elle201309
    liuypeter
    X_OMAR_X507
    Mary92880
    sscott20070
    afiaayiwa
    abhinavpra
    featherbol
    aljack33
    michellynelena
    ddd12017
    lumenmom
    sandrafetherston
    notbriandawkin
    janjaap2003
    myrissaday
    elvintopalov
    dskebeck
    labuff_joh
    maleahtt
    Gougarty
    oliorerend
    sagehamer
    aaliyahcecogo98
    madisonsullivan1905
    stephanieboyer_
    jessastauffer
    marinersapartmentcomplex
    deelevy
    nursefitnesswannabe
    keinohutchinson
    brooke4g1
    djor71
    ondrizi
    msracing2
    stallings1414
    iacheson7
    midecon
    nouhailben
    ahalpern6788
    judy78311357
    michele_fitz
    BloodyNine1
    sleduc4
    xxjaybby123xx
    lindarobbins57
    herrjon
    amandafouts1
    constanceborn1986
    pamela818503
    erikaojeda1213
    Hondoman31
    badger726
    mariansoc
    Erolinho
    bryanring452
    dsk9000
    tomchester1
    Jakler93
    ashkrenich98
    graysonmorgan1
    JarydT
    eshallmahmood
    TjCaron97
    ascencioalice530
    smit1127
    trstn_w
    lookmom6fttall
    bethkrueger109

  • goal06082021goal06082021 Member Posts: 810 Member Member Posts: 810 Member
    Got another one: lauramees. No sexy pfp, but suddenly popping up in my news feed with cyrillic and sketchy links.
  • dixiech1ckdixiech1ck Member Posts: 770 Member Member Posts: 770 Member
    Got another one today:

    Teun2289
  • dixiech1ckdixiech1ck Member Posts: 770 Member Member Posts: 770 Member
    aidenconnor1303
    katzel1314
    smadewes98
    seanbrennan2015
    tylerv_work
    richardwrenn10
    tobiaji1
    stevenlloydsmith2
    libcmin
    mthracol77
    T3mmiHu8
    Jaxtart
    mfp_erasder
    rbsb0227
    akwypych
    ufogirl95
    serre61
    ecse331
    lilbil6014
    elle201309
    liuypeter
    X_OMAR_X507
    Mary92880
    sscott20070
    afiaayiwa
    abhinavpra
    featherbol
    aljack33
    michellynelena
    ddd12017
    lumenmom
    sandrafetherston
    notbriandawkin
    janjaap2003
    myrissaday
    elvintopalov
    dskebeck
    labuff_joh
    maleahtt
    Gougarty
    oliorerend
    sagehamer
    aaliyahcecogo98
    madisonsullivan1905
    stephanieboyer_
    jessastauffer
    marinersapartmentcomplex
    deelevy
    nursefitnesswannabe
    keinohutchinson
    brooke4g1
    djor71
    ondrizi
    msracing2
    stallings1414
    iacheson7
    midecon
    nouhailben
    ahalpern6788
    judy78311357
    michele_fitz
    BloodyNine1
    sleduc4
    xxjaybby123xx
    lindarobbins57
    herrjon
    amandafouts1
    constanceborn1986
    pamela818503
    erikaojeda1213
    Hondoman31
    badger726
    mariansoc
    Erolinho
    bryanring452
    dsk9000
    tomchester1
    Jakler93
    ashkrenich98
    graysonmorgan1
    JarydT
    eshallmahmood
    TjCaron97
    ascencioalice530
    smit1127
    trstn_w
    lookmom6fttall
    bethkrueger109

    Add teun2289
  • lisabincolisabinco Member Posts: 1,079 Member Member Posts: 1,079 Member
    Just got another lewd "friend" request. Haven't you fixed this yet? It isn't hard. If the photo is raunchy or suggestive, block it. This makes about 10 of these in the last 2 months.
  • juliet3455juliet3455 Member Posts: 2,971 Member Member Posts: 2,971 Member
    @sugaraddict4321

    sashby45

    Male ( porno female profile pic )
    Hanson, KY
    Member since June 26, 2018
  • BettyBetty Member, MFP Moderator, Greeter, Premium Posts: 7,412 MFP Staff Member, MFP Moderator, Greeter, Premium Posts: 7,412 MFP Staff
    Thanks y'all. All of the one's since @sugaraddict4321 last updated have been added to the our list.
  • snowflake954snowflake954 Member Posts: 6,359 Member Member Posts: 6,359 Member
    nonagil
    rip123451200
    reduce246
    legitlauren_
    SophiaMaggs
    makennajean
    M4rvinBot
    jmartinvarela18
    kjb029
    merrareed18
    apriltownsend
    carlinpage
    zeack1
    mikeovic
    myfairlaurie
    alexjcruzr
    omayrarey
    samschwenger
    bekahtaylor92
    hayleesnyder02
    tigercarl2
    samchicken97
    lexi_clift29
    alliepereira2
    Lengerichmax
    rhiannanlesler
    psudman
    VacantEagle
    Jordinjo
    mongmich1
    mihxzel
    joshuaweston153
    zaria_t
    dodd22aa
  • robertw486robertw486 Member, Greeter, Premium Posts: 2,179 Member Member, Greeter, Premium Posts: 2,179 Member
    virginiabluis
    zclark1224
    tjgoodwin24
    rowsteve60
    nateyboy999
    ralix14
    coskunsdk
    Rotasha8014
    lucydahan
    rholiday25
    andrewloya234
    osavala13
    csmith3858
    willeeez
    whitneyleshay187
    ParkacetheDoc
    smoon1492
    sevag360
    vmcbarney
    oliviace99
    afinkelstein34
    Tamykas
    bregan79
    callumo16
    taranjefferies
    apeface88
    camillemb01
    megvnfoster
    chalenealic
    joselinegerman
    rbsb0227
    DaekChaos
    butterflybabyz
    Pawel2842
    marinamorrissey
    ryanparadiso13
    drchandrus
    armaanm452
    makennajean
    ilya_96
    mopargirlta
    elizet52
    nbailey987
    cbarnett2134
    rachelshields777
    ericar1v3
    Jallark
    aduschlad3827
    eshea2
    koreand
    sweet7k
    1643096884
    mtrullols
    Andy_Hsu
    aprildunn1981
    rosstheboss1985
    thechunsteez
    Alizen8
    Talviuni465
    aduschlad3827
    mackbrennan55
    Jayden20192020
    guar1973
    sandy6480
    almaazamien
    bianco2197
    CharlotteH97
    Kingy2410
    cheybaloo
    BenGrosso
    nikpmcmahon
    terrell952
    darius0828
    blakerose55
    KellyGlam101
    ericb008
    Mami715
    cierralyn20
    raaint
    vidhijain242
    JamesYei
    luvmet1262021
    JonathanLucasfit
    agatbu
    Fando84
    alaafradi
    yhurti
    2ster
    ajsaustinach
    chrfris
    elizabethr3a
    EdouardArras


    I'm noticing more and more deactivated accounts while going down the rabbit hole.
    edited April 5
  • snowflake954snowflake954 Member Posts: 6,359 Member Member Posts: 6,359 Member
    robertw486 wrote: »
    virginiabluis
    zclark1224
    tjgoodwin24
    rowsteve60
    nateyboy999
    ralix14
    coskunsdk
    Rotasha8014
    lucydahan
    rholiday25
    andrewloya234
    osavala13
    csmith3858
    willeeez
    whitneyleshay187
    ParkacetheDoc
    smoon1492
    sevag360
    vmcbarney
    oliviace99
    afinkelstein34
    Tamykas
    bregan79
    callumo16
    taranjefferies
    apeface88
    camillemb01
    megvnfoster
    chalenealic
    joselinegerman
    rbsb0227
    DaekChaos
    butterflybabyz
    Pawel2842
    marinamorrissey
    ryanparadiso13
    drchandrus
    armaanm452
    makennajean
    ilya_96
    mopargirlta
    elizet52
    nbailey987
    cbarnett2134
    rachelshields777
    ericar1v3
    Jallark
    aduschlad3827
    eshea2
    koreand
    sweet7k
    1643096884
    mtrullols
    Andy_Hsu
    aprildunn1981
    rosstheboss1985
    thechunsteez
    Alizen8
    Talviuni465
    aduschlad3827
    mackbrennan55
    Jayden20192020
    guar1973
    sandy6480
    almaazamien
    bianco2197
    CharlotteH97
    Kingy2410
    cheybaloo
    BenGrosso
    nikpmcmahon
    terrell952
    darius0828
    blakerose55
    KellyGlam101
    ericb008
    Mami715
    cierralyn20
    raaint
    vidhijain242
    JamesYei
    luvmet1262021
    JonathanLucasfit
    agatbu
    Fando84
    alaafradi
    yhurti
    2ster
    ajsaustinach
    chrfris
    elizabethr3a
    EdouardArras


    I'm noticing more and more deactivated accounts while going down the rabbit hole.

    Yup--but the sexy pics are still up.
  • heybalesheybales Member Posts: 18,657 Member Member Posts: 18,657 Member
    Ya, I don't understand how a pointer to what is a deleted account still has another pointer to a pic on that account.
    Unless this is merely a lag time issue on updates to the dispersed databases.
    But I sure thought I recalled seeing pics on account deleted like 3-4 days prior. That's a long lag time.

    Or perhaps things are being deleted in the wrong order showing up a flaw.
    Pics first - then account perhaps?
  • AnnPT77AnnPT77 Member, Premium Posts: 19,499 Member Member, Premium Posts: 19,499 Member
    heybales wrote: »
    Ya, I don't understand how a pointer to what is a deleted account still has another pointer to a pic on that account.
    Unless this is merely a lag time issue on updates to the dispersed databases.
    But I sure thought I recalled seeing pics on account deleted like 3-4 days prior. That's a long lag time.

    Or perhaps things are being deleted in the wrong order showing up a flaw.
    Pics first - then account perhaps?

    A poor database design (potentially from legacy times way back when these issues didn't exist) can lead to places like that, sometimes, IME. I don't know what database elements MFP may need for pattern-tracking on the abusers, and it's possible that the underlying structure limits deleting some records for reasons like that. No way to know, without more information about the architecture. I'm always very hesitant to assume competency issues with current tech staff, having had to live with some annoying "gifts" inherent in legacy code, when I was in IT myself.

    I'd guess the thumbnails (that appear on my friends list) are a different binary object than the photo on the actual profile, especially since it's obvious that deactivating the problem account doesn't get rid of that friend link. Possible that the thumbnail of my friends is stored in records associated with me (rather than with the "friend"), making it difficult to get rid of the problem thumbnail without trashing other OK ones, or affecting some other aspect of my database records. Like I said, I don't know; but I can imagine some theoretical database structures that would have those kinds of implications.

    Much annoyance can be created by poor database designs created back in times when knowledge about how to do it well, with referential integrity issues in their proper place, wasn't widespread through the industry. 🙄
  • erjones11erjones11 Member Posts: 421 Member Member Posts: 421 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    heybales wrote: »
    Ya, I don't understand how a pointer to what is a deleted account still has another pointer to a pic on that account.
    Unless this is merely a lag time issue on updates to the dispersed databases.
    But I sure thought I recalled seeing pics on account deleted like 3-4 days prior. That's a long lag time.

    Or perhaps things are being deleted in the wrong order showing up a flaw.
    Pics first - then account perhaps?

    A poor database design (potentially from legacy times way back when these issues didn't exist) can lead to places like that, sometimes, IME. I don't know what database elements MFP may need for pattern-tracking on the abusers, and it's possible that the underlying structure limits deleting some records for reasons like that. No way to know, without more information about the architecture. I'm always very hesitant to assume competency issues with current tech staff, having had to live with some annoying "gifts" inherent in legacy code, when I was in IT myself.

    I'd guess the thumbnails (that appear on my friends list) are a different binary object than the photo on the actual profile, especially since it's obvious that deactivating the problem account doesn't get rid of that friend link. Possible that the thumbnail of my friends is stored in records associated with me (rather than with the "friend"), making it difficult to get rid of the problem thumbnail without trashing other OK ones, or affecting some other aspect of my database records. Like I said, I don't know; but I can imagine some theoretical database structures that would have those kinds of implications.

    Much annoyance can be created by poor database designs created back in times when knowledge about how to do it well, with referential integrity issues in their proper place, wasn't widespread through the industry. 🙄

    It's just software, and with so many users generating advertising revenue? Software is just time and money, the more money you have the less time it takes.

    Hopefully they don't wait to spend the money until after too many users have exited, most people in this community aren't looking for a porn experience and will eventually leave if it does not get rained in. I am about done and likely there are others just like me.

    P.S. I am also one of the people who has followed advertising links and spent a dollar or two with the advertisers to this site, not to mention Under Armor products. I don't think Under Armor wants the reputation of providing a channel for smut.
  • janejellyrolljanejellyroll Member, Premium Posts: 25,241 Member Member, Premium Posts: 25,241 Member
    erjones11 wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    heybales wrote: »
    Ya, I don't understand how a pointer to what is a deleted account still has another pointer to a pic on that account.
    Unless this is merely a lag time issue on updates to the dispersed databases.
    But I sure thought I recalled seeing pics on account deleted like 3-4 days prior. That's a long lag time.

    Or perhaps things are being deleted in the wrong order showing up a flaw.
    Pics first - then account perhaps?

    A poor database design (potentially from legacy times way back when these issues didn't exist) can lead to places like that, sometimes, IME. I don't know what database elements MFP may need for pattern-tracking on the abusers, and it's possible that the underlying structure limits deleting some records for reasons like that. No way to know, without more information about the architecture. I'm always very hesitant to assume competency issues with current tech staff, having had to live with some annoying "gifts" inherent in legacy code, when I was in IT myself.

    I'd guess the thumbnails (that appear on my friends list) are a different binary object than the photo on the actual profile, especially since it's obvious that deactivating the problem account doesn't get rid of that friend link. Possible that the thumbnail of my friends is stored in records associated with me (rather than with the "friend"), making it difficult to get rid of the problem thumbnail without trashing other OK ones, or affecting some other aspect of my database records. Like I said, I don't know; but I can imagine some theoretical database structures that would have those kinds of implications.

    Much annoyance can be created by poor database designs created back in times when knowledge about how to do it well, with referential integrity issues in their proper place, wasn't widespread through the industry. 🙄

    It's just software, and with so many users generating advertising revenue? Software is just time and money, the more money you have the less time it takes.

    Hopefully they don't wait to spend the money until after too many users have exited, most people in this community aren't looking for a porn experience and will eventually leave if it does not get rained in. I am about done and likely there are others just like me.

    P.S. I am also one of the people who has followed advertising links and spent a dollar or two with the advertisers to this site, not to mention Under Armor products. I don't think Under Armor wants the reputation of providing a channel for smut.

    Under Armor no longer owns MFP, so there are no reputational concerns for them here.
  • erjones11erjones11 Member Posts: 421 Member Member Posts: 421 Member

    Under Armor no longer owns MFP, so there are no reputational concerns for them here.

    Great, one less thing to worry about! And do you think the new owners are interested in channeling smut?
Sign In or Register to comment.