Again read her posts, it is clear she was in the mood.

There's an easy way to get the answer to this, to clear up a lot of assumptions being made.

Amazona, were you ready to throw down and that was your signal? Or were you just getting a little extra handsy?

Or were you just getting a little extra handsy?

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: This made me laugh out loud Kits - HANDSY!!!!! hahahaha, love it!

I'm a little late to the thread, but you really shouldn't stress if you don't hear from him every single day at this point. While the call may not have been the best idea, it's too late now, and you should just move on.

How long have you known him -- a couple weeks? I'm always sort of amazed that people expect that you must start talking every day to someone just because you went on a couple of dates with them, or start panicking when they don't get a call or text every day. In fact, (and I realize others may disagree and call this "game playing"), I think it is a good thing to not talk every day in the early stages of dating. In my experience, retaining a little mystery isn't a bad thing, or letting him start to wonder why he hasn't heard from you, what you are doing, and who you are doing it with.

I'm just a bit beyond where you are with my latest guy. Yesterday we had date seven (first date was three weeks ago), and we still don't talk every day. We talk or see each other around 5 days a week. As a matter of fact, we talked briefly by text on Thursday, didn't talk Friday, so when we went out on Saturday night, he told me "It feels like forever since I talked to you!" I teased him -- "it's only been a day!" I would much rather have that reaction, then for him to be getting tired of hearing from me by this point. I don't do the "good morning" texts. They are just unnecessary, in my view. (And yes, I am crazy about this guy.)

I think you should just step back a little bit and relax. (And yes, I know how hard that is! I think dates 3-5 are the most nerve wracking in a lot of ways because by then you realize how much you like the person and that you have something to lose if you screw things up.)

Okay,I have given everyone all the latitude needed so from this point on please get back to the OP.

Looks like everything is okay with Amazona and that guy right now.

Lol, Nice personal attacks I am sure they add validity to your argument.

No I won't shoot personal attacks against you in response, although you at this point are an easy target, just letting you know.

I don't know where people get the idea that saying "I'm not going to make personal attacks, but there's a lot to say" isn't in and of itself an insult. That;s like pointing a gun at someone and then saying "I just saved your life because I chose not to shoot you". Uhhh, sure, I guess.

Sigh, when you are in the mood your religion PROHIBITS you to engage in it. She does not have that.

She -clearly- stated that she didn't want to go all the way until there was exclusivity. That has nothing to do with religion, you're the one that brought it up and started using it against Janie as a way to tell her that her opinion doesn't matter. Just because Amazona doesn't have religious morals telling her not to get straight up down and dirty, doesn't mean she can't have her own set to live by - which she obviously does.

No it wasn't a personal attack. I did not insult her once, you should highlight where I insulted her character.

The point that was made was, she would not be so selective about her sexuality if she wasn't religious.

Also, she is placing a blanket moral AT WHICH YOU YOURSELF SPOKE AGAINST that all women should wait for sex.

She claims this is a global moral that applies to women, when in recent posts you have made the statement

that there is no arbitrary timeline. It is whenever it feels right.

Nice contradicting yourself.

And again as far as OP is concerned, if you read her posts, it is more than obvious she wanted more.

She even talked about the high amounts of excitement and sexual tension, read page 2.

Stop arguing arbitrarily when you have nothing to argue.

Lol, Nice personal attacks I am sure they add validity to your argument.

No I won't shoot personal attacks against you in response, although you at this point are an easy target, just letting you know.

I don't know where people get the idea that saying "I'm not going to make personal attacks, but there's a lot to say" isn't in and of itself an insult. That;s like pointing a gun at someone and then saying "I just saved your life because I chose not to shoot you". Uhhh, sure, I guess.

Sigh, when you are in the mood your religion PROHIBITS you to engage in it. She does not have that.

She -clearly- stated that she didn't want to go all the way until there was exclusivity. That has nothing to do with religion, you're the one that brought it up and started using it against Janie as a way to tell her that her opinion doesn't matter. Just because Amazona doesn't have religious morals telling her not to get straight up down and dirty, doesn't mean she can't have her own set to live by - which she obviously does.

No it wasn't a personal attack. I did not insult her once, you should highlight where I insulted her character.

The point that was made was, she would not be so selective about her sexuality if she wasn't religious.

Also, she is placing a blanket moral AT WHICH YOU YOURSELF SPOKE AGAINST that all women should wait for sex.

She claims this is a global moral that applies to women, when in recent posts you have made the statement

that there is no arbitrary timeline. It is whenever it feels right.

Nice contradicting yourself.

And again as far as OP is concerned, if you read her posts, it is more than obvious she wanted more.

She even talked about the high amounts of excitement and sexual tension, read page 2.

Stop arguing arbitrarily when you have nothing to argue.

I refuse to debate this any further at the point where people start making things up and putting words in other peoples mouths because they can't argue the actual points.

I'm out.

Okay,I have given everyone all the latitude needed so from this point on please get back to the OP.

Carl, silly question, but why are you stifling debate?? Since when is it against the 'rules' to go off on a tangent??

We always do this in here?? Don't we? :huh:

I understand your concern, Anna. The goal is never to stifle conversation and of course tangents happen every day ALL day on these threads. They make this a very interesting, entertaining place.

Yet, given what's happened the last few weeks, it feels like there is a need to stop some of the issues earlier. Already in this thread, the attacks are small and growing again. Small enough where it can either lead to getting worse or small enough where two people can agree to disagree and not feel the need to win a battle. I don't think any of us want to repeat what happened last week....

Hi I am Zach haha.

I can be very argumentative, but keep in mind nothing I say is personal, or any personal attacks.

I am a ridiculously persistent against logical inconsistencies, which is why I am a sucker for these threads.

Anyways, I am glad OP's situation worked out her favor, and let us hope it eventually leads

to where she wants it to be