People Who Waited for Sex Before Marriage?
Karb_Kween
Posts: 2,681 Member
What about snapchat? i swear I've gone through enough blind dates to where I should see the goods before I decide on anything long term
What about y'all
What about y'all
0
Replies
-
What's Snapchat?1
-
I love sex before breakfast.
And before the fourth date.4 -
Snapchat didn't exist before I was married. So I guess the only option was actual sex.2
-
Got to know the sex is good first. Just keepin it real1
-
I don't understand all these "before marriage" questions lately. it's all going to have the same theme. The same thing applies to any of the previous before marriage questions. Those that said wait will say the same and those that said "get freaky" will say the same.
Also I think your title is wrong. Unless I've misunderstood the question5 -
Anyway...I am really traditional. Not that I believe you should wait for sex before marriage, but that isn't (always) the first thing on my mind. Never like the hook-up scene or one-night-stands. Sex was never a driving force to going out with someone. Usually that happened more naturally over time.
And I never understood finding out if sex was "good" first. I guess if you simply break it down to a physical act and that holds more of value over the intimacy of it, I can see how it is important. I was always more about the compatibility of being with the person than grading on sexual performance. If I was into someone than sexual activity was always enjoyable.
Meh.6 -
I think that no matter how much you like/love someone there can be no spark there when you have sex. Theoretically that could be fixed by talking about what you want/like in the bedroom but the issue is that people that wait for marriage tend to be virgins so have no idea what they like or how to discuss it.1
-
I sure as hell didn't wait...I got married when I was 31...that would have sucked.3
-
And I never understood finding out if sex was "good" first.
I think for most people that's shorthand for whether there's sexual compatibility or not.
If he wants it every day and she wants it twice a month, there isn't a compromise both people are going to be happy with. If he wants vanilla and she wants things he can't get into, again, any kind of compromise or none at all will leave them both feeling disappointed. Etc.0 -
Why buy the whole cow, when all you want is a glass of milk? just go get you some, and be happy, and love the life you live.0
-
That's why the butt sex was invented. FYI- Butt sex isn't sex.2
-
Anyway...I am really traditional. Not that I believe you should wait for sex before marriage, but that isn't (always) the first thing on my mind. Never like the hook-up scene or one-night-stands. Sex was never a driving force to going out with someone. Usually that happened more naturally over time.
And I never understood finding out if sex was "good" first. I guess if you simply break it down to a physical act and that holds more of value over the intimacy of it, I can see how it is important. I was always more about the compatibility of being with the person than grading on sexual performance. If I was into someone than sexual activity was always enjoyable.
Meh.
Most people I know are interested in the total package, including sexual compatibility. I'm fairly adventurous and I've dated women that I've been very attracted to and otherwise compatible with...but it was just boring in the bedroom because they were so vanilla. Conversely, I also dated a girl who turned every encounter into a freak circus or something and it was a bit much for me...
I think sexual compatibility is just as important as anything else.2 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »Anyway...I am really traditional. Not that I believe you should wait for sex before marriage, but that isn't (always) the first thing on my mind. Never like the hook-up scene or one-night-stands. Sex was never a driving force to going out with someone. Usually that happened more naturally over time.
And I never understood finding out if sex was "good" first. I guess if you simply break it down to a physical act and that holds more of value over the intimacy of it, I can see how it is important. I was always more about the compatibility of being with the person than grading on sexual performance. If I was into someone than sexual activity was always enjoyable.
Meh.
Most people I know are interested in the total package, including sexual compatibility. I'm fairly adventurous and I've dated women that I've been very attracted to and otherwise compatible with...but it was just boring in the bedroom because they were so vanilla. Conversely, I also dated a girl who turned every encounter into a freak circus or something and it was a bit much for me...
I think sexual compatibility is just as important as anything else.
Do you still have freak circus girl's number? You know, just asking for a friend.....5 -
RunHardBeStrong wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »Anyway...I am really traditional. Not that I believe you should wait for sex before marriage, but that isn't (always) the first thing on my mind. Never like the hook-up scene or one-night-stands. Sex was never a driving force to going out with someone. Usually that happened more naturally over time.
And I never understood finding out if sex was "good" first. I guess if you simply break it down to a physical act and that holds more of value over the intimacy of it, I can see how it is important. I was always more about the compatibility of being with the person than grading on sexual performance. If I was into someone than sexual activity was always enjoyable.
Meh.
Most people I know are interested in the total package, including sexual compatibility. I'm fairly adventurous and I've dated women that I've been very attracted to and otherwise compatible with...but it was just boring in the bedroom because they were so vanilla. Conversely, I also dated a girl who turned every encounter into a freak circus or something and it was a bit much for me...
I think sexual compatibility is just as important as anything else.
Do you still have freak circus girl's number? You know, just asking for a friend.....
Lol...no, that was about 17 years ago...I was pretty into it at first...she was in her 30s and I was in my mid 20s so that kind of turned me on too...but after about three months I was like, "can we please do this not hanging upside down from the ceiling fan?"...Lol...4 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »RunHardBeStrong wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »Anyway...I am really traditional. Not that I believe you should wait for sex before marriage, but that isn't (always) the first thing on my mind. Never like the hook-up scene or one-night-stands. Sex was never a driving force to going out with someone. Usually that happened more naturally over time.
And I never understood finding out if sex was "good" first. I guess if you simply break it down to a physical act and that holds more of value over the intimacy of it, I can see how it is important. I was always more about the compatibility of being with the person than grading on sexual performance. If I was into someone than sexual activity was always enjoyable.
Meh.
Most people I know are interested in the total package, including sexual compatibility. I'm fairly adventurous and I've dated women that I've been very attracted to and otherwise compatible with...but it was just boring in the bedroom because they were so vanilla. Conversely, I also dated a girl who turned every encounter into a freak circus or something and it was a bit much for me...
I think sexual compatibility is just as important as anything else.
Do you still have freak circus girl's number? You know, just asking for a friend.....
Lol...no, that was about 17 years ago...I was pretty into it at first...she was in her 30s and I was in my mid 20s so that kind of turned me on too...but after about three months I was like, "can we please do this not hanging upside down from the ceiling fan?"...Lol...
Haha! There is a fine line between too much and just right! I like to think I have the just right part figured out! LOL1 -
I couldn't wait. Not because I want it so badly, but because I never seem to want it, and I'm afraid nobody will put up with that, so it's better to be disappointed before I actually get married than after.5
-
Hungry_Angler wrote: »That's why the butt sex was invented. FYI- Butt sex isn't sex.
Then it would just be called Butt.
Or it is sex.1 -
Hungry_Angler wrote: »That's why the butt sex was invented. FYI- Butt sex isn't sex.
I think this calls for a whole new thread since you're redefining sex2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 901 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.2K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions