General Question - Why Do Doctors Push for Surgery?
Replies
-
Instead of guessing, or people online with their biases guessing, I recommend you ask your doctor at the next appointment. You can do that, you know.
It may be uncomfortable for you, but I promise; the discomfort only lasts as long as it takes to get the question out of past your lips. I recommend practicing it at home until you are satisfied with the wording, tone, etc, and it is slips out easily.11 -
Referral kickbacks. It’s a real thing, and seems to be pushed quite strongly in Florida where I live. I have to fight the feeling that ALL referrals are nefarious. I’m sure some are good and necessary, but I have had several referrals that I didn’t follow up on cause it just didn’t feel right. Many doctors in my area are all a part of the same medical group, so you know there’s money or at least clients being exchanged.8
-
paperpudding wrote: »Don't be fooled by ANY doctor. Whether it's surgery, medications, or regular "routine" visits, ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY - PLAIN & SIMPLE. Even if the doc appears to be a good person, they still have to tote the corporate line.
Well, of course they have to make a living, that goes for anybody in any occupation, - but I don't see how it is all about the money or toeing any corporate line or trying to fool anybody.
And certainly here in Australia, it makes no financial difference to the doctor whether they refer you for WLS, refer you to a dietician,prescribe medications, suggest WW or MFP or whatever to you or, conversely, say nothing about your weight at all.
I think there is probably a fair bit of difference between Australia and the US in this regard. In the US, there is a lot of financial pressure on doctors, and billions in marketing spent to encourage doctors to prescribe specific medicines and procedures. What the pharmaceutical industry in the US does with marketing to doctors ranges between highly unethical and flat out illegal. It's a big reason the opioid epidemic is as big as it is in the US.
I believe ultimately, most doctors are good people and got into medicine with the right intentions. Most still probably have those intentions. Without knowing more about OP's specific doctor, I wouldn't ascribe any particular ulterior motive to him. The likely answer is that he thinks weight loss surgery would be the most effective option for her, and is making his best recommendation for her. That doesn't mean that he's not wrong, but I wouldn't assign any bad faith to him without evidence, of which we don't have any.
But there is significant financial pressure on doctors in the US that there aren't in other countries, and it's not unreasonable that sometimes those pressures inform their decision making more than they would like to admit in certain situations.
That may be so - can only speak for situation here - where sure, med reps do recomend and promote their products - but there are very strict guidelines about how this must be transparent and Drs do not financially benifit from any referals, prescriptions etc
1 -
paperpudding wrote: »paperpudding wrote: »Don't be fooled by ANY doctor. Whether it's surgery, medications, or regular "routine" visits, ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY - PLAIN & SIMPLE. Even if the doc appears to be a good person, they still have to tote the corporate line.
Well, of course they have to make a living, that goes for anybody in any occupation, - but I don't see how it is all about the money or toeing any corporate line or trying to fool anybody.
And certainly here in Australia, it makes no financial difference to the doctor whether they refer you for WLS, refer you to a dietician,prescribe medications, suggest WW or MFP or whatever to you or, conversely, say nothing about your weight at all.
I think there is probably a fair bit of difference between Australia and the US in this regard. In the US, there is a lot of financial pressure on doctors, and billions in marketing spent to encourage doctors to prescribe specific medicines and procedures. What the pharmaceutical industry in the US does with marketing to doctors ranges between highly unethical and flat out illegal. It's a big reason the opioid epidemic is as big as it is in the US.
I believe ultimately, most doctors are good people and got into medicine with the right intentions. Most still probably have those intentions. Without knowing more about OP's specific doctor, I wouldn't ascribe any particular ulterior motive to him. The likely answer is that he thinks weight loss surgery would be the most effective option for her, and is making his best recommendation for her. That doesn't mean that he's not wrong, but I wouldn't assign any bad faith to him without evidence, of which we don't have any.
But there is significant financial pressure on doctors in the US that there aren't in other countries, and it's not unreasonable that sometimes those pressures inform their decision making more than they would like to admit in certain situations.
That may be so - can only speak for situation here - where sure, med reps do recomend and promote their products - but there are very strict guidelines about how this must be transparent and Drs do not financially benifit from any referals, prescriptions etc
Not in the good old U S of A, perks abound from pharmaceutical companies to doctors here.2 -
grinning_chick wrote: »Instead of guessing, or people online with their biases guessing, I recommend you ask your doctor at the next appointment. You can do that, you know.
It may be uncomfortable for you, but I promise; the discomfort only lasts as long as it takes to get the question out of past your lips. I recommend practicing it at home until you are satisfied with the wording, tone, etc, and it is slips out easily.
This. It sounds like you like your doctor otherwise and it might be really worth resolving this in person, with him!
It might be worth asking if he thinks you are developing a weight-related disease or something (eg pre-diabetic) that is pushing this question.
I’ve learned stats & blood work aren’t always shared in detail until a threshold is met (my iron level was the lowest in the normal range and I wasn’t told until I started losing hair!).
I had similar stats to you now - 5’2 205lbs - and all my doctor recommended was a nutritionist visit. I think at that point I would have just met the minimum requirements for WLS. But yes without underlying medical issues it is an odd recommendation.
Congratulations on your loss!!!
Logging can always be more accurate. I lost most of my weight so far using measuring cups, but I tell ya the food scale has been a game changer. It also generates fewer dishes! And I’m still not totally accurate. (Weighing cooked meat is inaccurate etc). Being honest with yourself about where you can tighten it up a bit - maybe not eating back exercise calories (as a low impact activity person im always skeptical of the estimates for walking etc) is good to know if your loss slows or stalls etc.
I’m also someone who has re-gained and is losing again, (lost 50 gained 20 lost 8) so slow & steady is definitely better!4 -
grinning_chick wrote: »Instead of guessing, or people online with their biases guessing, I recommend you ask your doctor at the next appointment. You can do that, you know.
It may be uncomfortable for you, but I promise; the discomfort only lasts as long as it takes to get the question out of past your lips. I recommend practicing it at home until you are satisfied with the wording, tone, etc, and it is slips out easily.
This. It sounds like you like your doctor otherwise and it might be really worth resolving this in person, with him!
It might be worth asking if he thinks you are developing a weight-related disease or something (eg pre-diabetic) that is pushing this question.
I’ve learned stats & blood work aren’t always shared in detail until a threshold is met (my iron level was the lowest in the normal range and I wasn’t told until I started losing hair!).
I had similar stats to you now - 5’2 205lbs - and all my doctor recommended was a nutritionist visit. I think at that point I would have just met the minimum requirements for WLS. But yes without underlying medical issues it is an odd recommendation.
Congratulations on your loss!!!
Logging can always be more accurate. I lost most of my weight so far using measuring cups, but I tell ya the food scale has been a game changer. It also generates fewer dishes! And I’m still not totally accurate. (Weighing cooked meat is inaccurate etc). Being honest with yourself about where you can tighten it up a bit - maybe not eating back exercise calories (as a low impact activity person im always skeptical of the estimates for walking etc) is good to know if your loss slows or stalls etc.
I’m also someone who has re-gained and is losing again, (lost 50 gained 20 lost 8) so slow & steady is definitely better!
Thank you. I will ask him directly on my next visit. May as well.
My stats/bloodwork are always shared so I'm fully aware of them being normal other than slightly elevated cholesterol, which he didn't feel was necessary to have me on medication for. I have access to an online database which is in a chart that I can reference that goes back since I've been his patient (I'm sort of new to his practice so it's only about 2 years). I was never diagnosed as pre-diabetic either. I did, see a nutritionist for a couple of months at the beginning of changing my diet for guidance - she was extremely helpful for planning meals, portions and getting my head straight about it too. I highly recommend this to anyone.
Perhaps, being that he doesn't know my complete history of weight loss this impacts his viewpoint; he isn't fully aware of previous times I lost weight on my own and kept it off for many years other than what I told him. My records from my prior physician only included diagnostics, not written notations of conversations (that doctor retired). So, it's heresay to him what I relate about my weight loss history and I can see that he may not fully believe me since he has no way of knowing if it's true or not.
I use a scale at home to weigh food, not cups/spoons. Same at work - I keep a small scale at my desk and use that when possible. Most of the food at get at the office is from places that have nutritional info on their websites so I'm fairly confident that it's more or less close to what is stated. I too am skeptical of calories listed so I try to leave some room for plus/minus what is listed. I'm eating fairly low fat (and good fats at that), lower carb (not low carb, I can't manage that), very low sugar (that's easy for me), there's like no trans fats in my diet, very little to no cholesterol unless I eat eggs, good lean proteins, way more vegetable based meals, barely eat dairy at all anymore either. Seriously have completely revamped my eating!5 -
grinning_chick wrote: »Instead of guessing, or people online with their biases guessing, I recommend you ask your doctor at the next appointment. You can do that, you know.
It may be uncomfortable for you, but I promise; the discomfort only lasts as long as it takes to get the question out of past your lips. I recommend practicing it at home until you are satisfied with the wording, tone, etc, and it is slips out easily.
This. It sounds like you like your doctor otherwise and it might be really worth resolving this in person, with him!
It might be worth asking if he thinks you are developing a weight-related disease or something (eg pre-diabetic) that is pushing this question.
I’ve learned stats & blood work aren’t always shared in detail until a threshold is met (my iron level was the lowest in the normal range and I wasn’t told until I started losing hair!).
I had similar stats to you now - 5’2 205lbs - and all my doctor recommended was a nutritionist visit. I think at that point I would have just met the minimum requirements for WLS. But yes without underlying medical issues it is an odd recommendation.
Congratulations on your loss!!!
Logging can always be more accurate. I lost most of my weight so far using measuring cups, but I tell ya the food scale has been a game changer. It also generates fewer dishes! And I’m still not totally accurate. (Weighing cooked meat is inaccurate etc). Being honest with yourself about where you can tighten it up a bit - maybe not eating back exercise calories (as a low impact activity person im always skeptical of the estimates for walking etc) is good to know if your loss slows or stalls etc.
I’m also someone who has re-gained and is losing again, (lost 50 gained 20 lost 8) so slow & steady is definitely better!
Thank you. I will ask him directly on my next visit. May as well.
My stats/bloodwork are always shared so I'm fully aware of them being normal other than slightly elevated cholesterol, which he didn't feel was necessary to have me on medication for. I have access to an online database which is in a chart that I can reference that goes back since I've been his patient (I'm sort of new to his practice so it's only about 2 years). I was never diagnosed as pre-diabetic either. I did, see a nutritionist for a couple of months at the beginning of changing my diet for guidance - she was extremely helpful for planning meals, portions and getting my head straight about it too. I highly recommend this to anyone.
Perhaps, being that he doesn't know my complete history of weight loss this impacts his viewpoint; he isn't fully aware of previous times I lost weight on my own and kept it off for many years other than what I told him. My records from my prior physician only included diagnostics, not written notations of conversations (that doctor retired). So, it's heresay to him what I relate about my weight loss history and I can see that he may not fully believe me since he has no way of knowing if it's true or not.
I use a scale at home to weigh food, not cups/spoons. Same at work - I keep a small scale at my desk and use that when possible. Most of the food at get at the office is from places that have nutritional info on their websites so I'm fairly confident that it's more or less close to what is stated. I too am skeptical of calories listed so I try to leave some room for plus/minus what is listed. I'm eating fairly low fat (and good fats at that), lower carb (not low carb, I can't manage that), very low sugar (that's easy for me), there's like no trans fats in my diet, very little to no cholesterol unless I eat eggs, good lean proteins, way more vegetable based meals, barely eat dairy at all anymore either. Seriously have completely revamped my eating!
Way to go! And good luck with your conversation, hopefully you’ll have a good relationship with your doctor again 🙂2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.4K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 895 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.2K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions