For those who lost all the weight. What was your rate of weight loss for your entire journey?

Anybody lose 2 Ibs a week the whole way through? Or did you do 2 Ibs a week until a certain point and then move to 1 Ib a week when you were approaching goal weight?

Curious to hear how other people are doing it

Replies

  • Lietchi
    Lietchi Posts: 7,361 Member

    I never did 2lbs per week and that was intentional. I started at 1 lb per week for the first 25-30lbs - I was actually aiming at a slower rate of loss but my metabolism is a bit quicker than average. The rate of loss very gradually slowed down, first because my calorie goal stayed the same even though I had lost weight (I didn't realize that MFP doesn't automatically adjust the goal) and later on it became harder to stick to my calorie goal as rigidly. I lost 75 lbs in total.

    Tapering down the rate of loss closer to goal is normal and, more importantly, healthy. Losing 2lbs per week isn't appropriate for people who weigh less than 200lbs. The general guideline is 0.5-1% of bodyweight per week, with the lower rate being more appropriate when close to goal.

  • springlering62
    springlering62 Posts: 10,525 Member
    edited November 18

    and PS, while I set the “per week” loss just to get the calorie goal numbers, I never followed it or thought it was gospel.

    The whole way through, I was encouraged by dietician and trainer to keep increasing calories, which blew my mind.

    I just took the attitude that any loss was a good loss, and I was in it for the long run, regardless.

    I sometimes think that taking that sort of relaxed attitude actually helped move things along faster. I’d thought this would take years, if attainable at all. No one was more surprised than me at my own success.

    I’d almost reached goal 18 months in, when my trainer convinced me, my final “goal” was way too low and that I needed to put weight back on.

    Make sure you’re not pushing yourself past where you should go, too.

    Hugs to you. I’m so happy to see you around, posting, questioning, and hanging in there. We’re lifers, right? I’ve lost the damn weight and have no intentions of putting it back on!

  • lesdarts180
    lesdarts180 Posts: 3,611 Member

    I lost 22.5 kg (about 50 lb) over 9 months which averages just over 1 lb per week. However, I am (and was then) retired, so I have holidays, days out, meals with friends, etc. So I had many weeks when I lost 2 lbs, but also many weeks with no loss (even gained a little when away on holiday for a fortnight) and of course, all amounts on between. My weight loss was not linear, and in fact, very few people will have a linear weight loss pattern.

    As the others have said above, everyone is unique and should follow their own route, with the goal of being healthy.

  • lesdarts180
    lesdarts180 Posts: 3,611 Member

    And ps, I reached "goal" weight over 6 years ago and still bounce up and down by a kg or so every time I go on holiday (several times a year). It is a lifelong challenge.

  • springlering62
    springlering62 Posts: 10,525 Member

    another thing, if you’re closing your diary that “you will weigh Xxx in five weeks” thing drove me barking crazy. M

    I sincerely beleive that’s what drives away many users. They feel they’ve failed if the don’t meet that digital goal.

  • spiriteagle99
    spiriteagle99 Posts: 3,863 Member

    It really depends on how much weight you have to lose. When I started, I only intended to lose about 35 pounds, so my weight loss goal was about a pound a week. When I reached that goal, I set my calorie goal for maintenance, but continued to lose weight. Turns out that with a lot of intentional exercise, my body burns fairly hot. I lost 20 more pounds, at a rate of about .5 a week. Then I got more careful about eating all my allotted calories, and then some. I've maintained that loss for several years, with some fluctuations for vacations and holidays.

  • briscogun
    briscogun Posts: 1,269 Member

    I lost about 11.5 lbs my first month (it was actually down lower after about 3 weeks but I took a weeks vacation in there and popped up a bit). Was down 21.5 lbs after 2 months. I slowed it down after that and I am maintaining about a 25-29 loss for the past few months.

    I actually started a low-FODMAP diet at the end of May, and started keeping track of my weight just to see if I was having other "issues" besides by digestion, and the weight just FELL off. I've slowly reintroduced some food that are on the naughty list and they seem to be ok for me, but wow I know that diet isn't about weight loss but boy howdy did it drop off weight for me!

  • rms62003
    rms62003 Posts: 278 Member

    2 lbs/week is a LOT of weight to lose for more than just a few months. I'm down 100 lbs, and did lose it at about 1.5 lbs a week over the last 14 months. Now that I'm about 30 lbs from my goal, I want to slow that weight loss down and concentrate on keeping/building muscle.

    The less you have to lose, the slower it will come off. The body always naturally fights weight loss.

    I would recommend focusing more on healthy lifestyle and sustainability. A rapid weight loss is just not a sustainable lifestyle.

  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 38,482 Community Helper

    In total, I lost about 50 pounds. It was faster at first, intentionally very slow at the end.

    I lost close to 2 pounds a week at the start, which was too fast. I got weak and fatigued, then took multiple weeks to recover even though I corrected as soon as I realized. No one needs that. I was lucky. I may've had a little hair thinning, had some problems with my nails peeling/splitting, but it could've been much worse. It is for some people: Muscle loss, immune system supression, gallbladder problems, and more.

    A common recommendation around here is to lose around half a percent of current weight per week, maybe up to one percent if severely obese and under medical supervision for nutritional deficiencies or health complications. Maybe someone can lose faster than half a percent without health risks if young, resilient, and in an otherwise very low stress lifestyle, At 200 pounds, half a percent is a pound a week. At 400 pounds, it'd be two pounds a week.

    Another different rule of thumb is to cut no more than 20% to maybe 25% from current weight maintenance calories.

    Fast weight loss can be a trap: Harder to stick with long enough to lose a meaningful total amount of weight, and doesn't much help a person realistically learn how to eat long term in order to stay at a healthy weight. (Most people find keeping weight off harder than losing it in the first place.) On top of that, there's no way to get minimally adequate nutrition on too-few calories, because we need certain minimum volumes of protein, fats, and micronutrients. Pills and powders are much hyped, but not an equivalent substitute for nutrients from food.

    I averaged a pound a week weight loss over the whole time I was losing. Like I said, faster at first, very slow at the end. In my case, the loss didn't slow by itself - a thing many do experience. I had to intentionally increase calories to slow down.

    The too-fast loss lasted maybe as much as a month or two before I crashed. After that, the loss rate was down to around a pound a week for most of the time I kept losing. When I got to maybe 10-15 pounds remaining, I started slowing down, aiming for more like half a pound a week. Once I reached a good weight, I gradually increased calories so overshot goal weight by a few pounds while trying to find accurate maintenance calorie level. I've been maintaing my weight in a healthy range for around 10 years since loss, while old (just turned 70), of course menopausal, and severely hypothyroid (medicated). That was after being overweight to obese for around 30 years, the last dozen of which I was already athletically active, working out hard generally 6 days most weeks.

    Personally, given my experiences, I wouldn't try losing as fast as 2 pounds a week unless I were waaaay over 200 pounds. More difficult, more unpleasant, more health risk. Last time I'd let a literal few pounds creep on in maintenance, I crept them off again: Looking backward, it was around a pound a month of weight loss. 😆 Yup, slow, probably not ideal for someone with lots to lose, but for a few pounds, I'd do it again if I had to. It was pretty much painless.

    Best wishes!

  • bcalvanese
    bcalvanese Posts: 47 Member
    edited November 19

    I got a Garmin fitness device, and linked it to MFP. I set MFP to lose 1 lb. per week, and started logging my food, but just my main meals. I always left about 500 calories open for grazing, and I included my exercise calories that synced from the Garmin.

    In 52 weeks, I lost 57 lbs.

  • ddsb1111
    ddsb1111 Posts: 1,092 Member
    edited November 21

    .7 lbs a week and I treated the entire 4 months like I was going to the Olympics. Accuracy and consistency with zero room for error.

    Crazy thing is, maintenance isn’t that much different. You still need to be accountable, eat roughly the same things, you just get slightly more calories.

    When I see people needing to lose less than 50 lbs shooting for “a slow 2 lbs a week”, I just shake my head. 2 lbs is Formula 1 fast in the game of weight loss, and grueling. Just don’t.

  • age_is_just_a_number
    age_is_just_a_number Posts: 1,442 Member

    I rarely lose 2lbs in a week. I fluctuate a lot with an overall downward trend, if I keep a caloric deficit.

  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,950 Member
    edited November 22

    In the beginning it's easy to lose two pounds per week when you have a lot of weight to lose. The body uses stored body fat for energy.

    After a while at a low enough calorie level that would facilitate a two pound per week loss, vitamin and mineral intake has become a problem. Unless you're under doctor or Dietician supervision, that's inevitable. It's nearly impossible to get sufficient nutrition on very low calories. So health and vitality are going to suffer, there's really no way around that. Fatigue, irritability, trouble sleeping, depression, hair/nail/skin problems are common side effects a couple months in. Trust me, you don't want to have to deal with that.

    So no. I lost around 80 pounds over a period of two years. It was fast at first and then like Ann, I hit a wall and it took a couple months to recover from under-eating. I went up in calories and lost the rest of the weight at a more reasonable rate.

  • claireychn074
    claireychn074 Posts: 1,980 Member

    I had to go and check my records, but I lost at roughly one pound a week. In hindsight it was a bit fast but I did slow down my rate of loss after a couple of months and then my weightlifting coach made me eat more. I hit 53kg and wanted to get to 51kg but my coach made me eat more. He was right - I had low body fat and looking back, I looked gaunt.

  • springlering62
    springlering62 Posts: 10,525 Member

    Thank heaven for coaches and trainers who will speak their minds when necessary, right? This is exactly what happened to me.

    What I thought would be the “perfect goal weight” simply was not. Weight sits differently at 56 than 26.

  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 10,236 Member

    I lost 2 lbs a week pretty consistently for roughly three months, although I had set my goal for 1 lb a week. At first I thought the extra weight loss was water weight, then I thought maybe it was related to what point in my menstrual cycle I had started. But after three months I used the data I had accumulated to calculate my maintenance calorie needs and found they were about 400 cals above what MFP predicted. So I guess I'm just at the high end of the distribution curve.

    I added on some calories to my daily base goal (i.e., pre-intentional exercise) to lose a pound and a half per week and became more permissive with myself on going over some days (we were just entering my first holiday season on MFP), and I ended up actually losing (on average) a little under a pound a week over the next five months.

    Although I was still a hair over the line between obese and overweight, I had improved the various numbers (blood sugar, cholesterol, blood pressure) that had me concerned enough to really commit to weight loss, so I raised my daily goal to about a half pound a week and in practice was happy with any weekly intake up to maintenance. I still wanted to Lose weight but I wasn't in any hurry.

    I didn't notice any problem with the initial two pounds a week loss (i.e., no inordinate hunger, loss of energy, or other health issues) but that was just under 1% of my weight at the time. I would not recommend intentionally shooting for two pounds a week unless you're obese and under a doctor's care.

  • nossmf
    nossmf Posts: 15,961 Member

    My first time losing weight on MFP, I dropped about 50lbs in a little under a year, was very bony, but that was before I discovered a love affair with weightlifting and packed on muscle (and fat with it).

    This past year I made an effort to drop fat while keeping the muscle I'd earned, and I lost 35lbs in almost exactly a year, keeping almost all of the muscle along the way. Now I really like the way I look!

    If you do the math, this second weight loss effort averaged out to 0.67 lbs/wk, but here's the thing: out of those 52 weeks of the year, I think I lost that magic 0.67 lbs/wk for maybe two of the weeks. The rest of the time I was losing a pound here, a half a pound there, go up a pound, maintain, drop two pounds…the weekly numbers were all over the map.

    Even now in "maintenance" my weight has fluctuated up two pounds in one week, down two pounds the next week…without changing the way I eat, exercise, sleep, etc.

    So the question "for your entire journey" seems a bit disingenuous to me.