IVMay Member

Replies

  • Progress is being made each year towards battling the big C. It's such a resilient turd, however.
  • Selfish people and the unaware. No concept of putting things back where they found them for other peoples use.
  • I don't know my particular purpose. I'm sure there's one somewhere :)
  • OOH I really want to post this song this thread reminded me of that group. Cheesy early 90's dance video coming up [video="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Txl_k3OwnJE"]https://youtube.com/watch?v=Txl_k3OwnJE[/video]
  • How much time do you dedicate towards it? Can it be possible to do for say 20 minutes is that sufficient or?
    in Meditation Comment by IVMay April 2017
  • Don't worry about it. I'm not :) All good
    in Meditation Comment by IVMay April 2017
  • Popeyes sounds familiar. Think I've seen one in London don't normally eat that food but admittedly the whiff of fried chicken is a friendly smell indeed.
  • Elsie - I was kidding. Well - now and then I'll take a Xanax or Diazepam if I'm feeling a off after an awful day but that's rare. I was thinking about meditation after a recent accident and I suppose it's worth looking into while I have the time available...
    in Meditation Comment by IVMay April 2017
  • Wow. The people in your life have no tact or subtlety whatsoever. Humans can definitely suck.
  • Nope. Never tried it. May look into it at some point rather than relying on prescription pills.
    in Meditation Comment by IVMay April 2017
  • "You gonna eat that?" "Well - I kind of haven't started it.... but yeah"
  • Welcome hope you succeed in your goals :)
  • Sorry to hear that. Nothing worse than living near noise like that. Well there obviously is but it's so inconsiderate. Can't you look as to gorvernment enforcement notices or noise restriction notices you could gather evience and forward it to a local authority/whatever you have in your location?
  • No - look at the figures and differences. Particular emphasis on abdominal in Ox and through its pharmacology with GH precisely *WHERE* you inject it into the fat cells before it spreads. Yeah - sure you can eat in a deficit, train and lose fat as well as muscle - all over.... over time. What you CANNOT do is remain static…
  • Moralistic viewpoints when it comes to factual science is by the by. They asked a question and got a factual answer. Others then started with the: No you can't oh no you can't nuh huh mentality and decided to blurt it out without any tact. The names of them shouldn't have been blurted out by that individual in public where…
  • Can I personally ask you how you came across this site? University of Southern California 2004 is a good place to start. http://jap.physiology.org/content/96/3/1055 http://jap.physiology.org/content/96/3/1055.figures-only Oxandrolone reduced total (-1.9 ± 1.0 kg) and trunk fat (-1.3 ± 0.6 kg; P < 0.001), and these…
  • Because..... people. Because.... "humans be humans". They are prescribed often enough to those who need them. Just because something is effective doesn't mean it is something that should be publicly available or even a first/second even third option for those seeking a certain goal? Example: gammahydroxybutyrate acid…
  • My first opening post on here was this: "There are certain compounds that will allow spot reduction and others that have been medically shown in studies to fight certain areas of fat. Naturally through diet and exercise: NO. Your genetically predisposed to storing fat in certain areas depending on your genetics. Everybody…
  • I have nothing to prove that studies before me haven't already done. A case study is specific. A group study and years of research is better. But hey - who am I to judge what you yourself think is more valid...... I just know what the research community would prefer when using it as evidence.
  • Sigh. You've contradicted yourself there. The OP asked about spot reduction. The OP employed a method of use that dealt more with water and sweat than actual fat. The responses were of a technical nature regarding fat loss. water. muscle. etc etc. I gave a technical dispute using science. I was asked to clarify. The thing…
  • I don't see the retraction of anything. I can't be emphatic enough when I tell you this: please look above and look at what was actually written. He wanted some "Men's Health" type comparison nonsense. I'm sure there's plenty of before and after shots of these on the internet to view if he's that desperate.
  • Sure thing, buddy. Cool idea, bro.
  • I've already done it in private. Since he has namedropped two examples and I've provided further information I'll assume you've heard of search engines? I'm not here to be your joey or dog and fetch for you when I've already provided my examples as well as sent him links. I'm glad you get joy in destroying clown science.…
  • Yeah - to be honest I didn't want specific names brought up in the thread (edit) because it would lead people to assume some condoning of use but he decided to bring about it public. Would have been better to grandstand referring to them as O or H. There's others out there like Intaleukin 3, 6, 8 and 15 and all sorts of…
  • You certainly seem to be afraid of reading into studies and researching anything, right? AOD9604 or Fragment 176-191 have arisen specifically due to the spot reduction abilities of GH.
  • Are you really that silly? It *SPECIFICALLY* targets abdominal regions. Glucocorticoid signalling blocking. It accomplishes its effects different from other compounds in its manner of abdominal fat reduction. No normal steroids are known to spot reduce specific areas. You could argue something unsafe/untested like Tren has…
  • I won't - if he wants to be silly and publicly mention things that were entrusted in a private setting to show that it is biologically possible with said compounds then that's up to him. What I found hilarious is that he clearly didn't read the papers and studies let alone look them up to do his own research. Grandstanding…
  • And why would that be? Hey - I'm not the one who thought to namedrop anything publicly. He wanted to show off and start spewing specifics. Pity that he is factually incorrect. Would have been better responding directly but something tells me that would have given little to no 'street cred'? heh
  • Not to you - two people who asked for it (One of whom is online now - Steven) have been provided with examples. As for the used car salesman - if he so wishes to forward you any information that's up to him I certainly won't be to yourself. "Showing another user" - I specifically messaged that initial user asking for…
Avatar