johnslater461 Member

Pay close attention to the bolded sentence. This point has been made repeatedly yet you continue to ignore it

Congratulations?

I'm a virgo, so if I talked about my diet the thread would get moved to chitchat

You posted an article from collective evolution. About as far from peer review as you can get. And by posting it you are implicitly suggesting that you agree with the conclusions. It's concerning that you would post such unsubstantiated nonsense and present it as fact It's also a term used to criticize outlandish claims.…

Citation needed Congratulations! You have managed to find the least reputable site on the net https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Collective_Evolution https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/collective-evolution/ "Overall, we rate Collective-Evolution a quackery level pseudoscience website based on promoting miracle cures, anti-vaxx…

Fixed

If you're claiming that yellow mustard counts as "many types of vegetables", do you also count grasping at straws as "vigorous exercise"?

All causes? Car accidents? Terrorist attacks? Drowning? Domestic violence? Tuberculosis?

All matter is made of chemicals.

Another vote for listening to a variety of opinions in the main forums rather than going into an echo chamber whose self proclaimed ambassador has only been in maintenance for two months. OP: more details would be helpful. When you say fasting 3 days per week are you referring to alternate day fasting? If so, what does…

Apparently that if you're full, then your food didn't fuel you (Full = food - fuel) Also, food that doesn't fill you up will fuel you (Fuel = food - full)

This article says nothing supporting your claims about " gut flora driving carb binges" or the claim of "10% of human brain cells existing between our front door and back door" So instead of Gish galloping around, how about addressing the aforementioned points? Or just admit that you don't know what you're talking about.

And as usual it looks like you're playing fast and loose with definitions and numbers. One can only assume you're referring to the enteric nervous system, and while it is comprised of neurons, so are every nerve cell in your body. So calling them "brain cells" is disingenuous, at best. And the percentage of neurons in the…

Do you even read the links you post? And men are not affected at all by these beverages. ... Whether there is a causal relationship, and what the exact mechanism of that relationship is, is unclear,” Dr. Rosian says. “Several studies have shown those relationships, but the data overall are not entirely conclusive.” And you…

Why would you think otherwise? Phosphoric acid is a weak acid that is classified as GRAS. Any risks (however small) associated with phosphoric acid stem from excess phosphorus, which would mean that the aforementioned foods present a greater risk.

Better steer clear of burgers, cream, and round eggs then, since they all contain much more phosphorus than soda

And you would be wrong. See my previous post about the Inuit. This is why science doesn't rely on intuition.

And? Instead of citation dumping, provide excerpts from your sources and explain how they support your premise. Merely listing names and links without context does nothing to support your position

Are you claiming that the laws of thermodynamics are, in fact, variable?

Um, you were the one making the claim. But the fact that the Inuit have developed a genetic adaptation to avoid ketosis despite their high fat diet is a clue https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/2017/10/26/inuit-genetics-show-us-evolution-not-want-us-constant-ketosis-mwm-2-37/

Patently false.

Do you actually believe that one could have a placebo controlled dietary intervention? Do some of the participants eat fake fruit? Or are you just spewing out terms that you don't understand?

So clearly the dietary guidelines caused all those things too.

Then why would you lend it any credence?

So what you're saying is no, you don't have any non anecdotal evidence. Got it

Rhode Island Reds?