Official Sexism Thread.

1356

Replies

  • AnnaPixie
    AnnaPixie Posts: 7,439 Member
    OMG Politics!!!!!!!!!!!! :noway: :noway: :noway: :noway: :noway: :noway: :noway:

    No time to even read this thread today, so will catch up soon! :smooched: :flowerforyou:






    PS Hope you're all being RESPECTFUL!!!!!!!!!! :bigsmile:
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    You really weren't reading my prior responses. I'm disappointed :(

    You can say "No Exceptions" all day long, but the fact is, rich people buy out politicians all the time and lie about it. Hell, there are some people that don't even bother to hide it well but no one can do anything because it's too easy to say "coincidence". Happens a lot.

    So you want the government, which is already fallible and corruptible, to run a lottery system that they claim can't be broken? NO EXCEPTIONS. I don't trust my government with our money, let alone the lives of citizens.

    My dearest Kit,

    This is purely an intellectual exercise. Simply because there is NO WAY they would allow a draft, mainly because the military would understand quickly that the game is up. Plus, the soccer moms would march on the capital if they thought little Billie really had a chance to get drafted and go die in a hole in the desert in some country less than 2% of Americans could find on a map. Ain't gonna happen...

    So we might as well assume that "no exceptions" are possible, as well, when we're playing these fantasy games.

    --P

    Well in that case I want a unicorn and one billion dollars! And since it's fantasy with no limitations, why are we discussing how to end war through manipulation, when we can just wave our hand and it's over? TADA! World Peace. You are welcome <3

    I like this game! 8)
  • flimflamfloz
    flimflamfloz Posts: 1,980 Member
    So... Since you're "laughing out loud", I guess you don't think there are domains in which men are discriminated?
    The world is not fair, never will be. Overall, men have made out incredibly well. And the numbers back that up. So for white men to start whining about discrimination, well... Sorry, it's just not my style.
    --P
    It's good for you that it is not your style, but that doesn't make the whole debate topic and direction chosen by the OP invalid - OP, who let's remember opened this thread and chose to look at the problem under this specific angle.
    I played the game and replied to OP from this standpoint.

    Now, I agree with you (and I would say that probably everyone here agrees as well) that the problem of the discrimination of women is bigger than the problem of the discrimination of men, as numbers back that up.
    Similarly though, there are worse problems than the condition of women in Western world societies but that doesn't and shouldn't make the debate about the condition of women invalid either.

    As far as whining, I very much doubt you've seen me whining about this issue since I'm perfectly aware that women get the short straw.
    But eh, it's a purely intellectual exercise to debate about this topic, isn't it? :wink:
  • pa_jorg
    pa_jorg Posts: 4,401 Member
    Personally, I'm over discussing this topic here, but since it's touched on both sexism and politics, please be sure to heed this wise advice: http://bindersfullofwomen.tumblr.com/post/33750544241/nobody-puts-baby-in-a-binder

    A little reference for anyone outside the US who might not know what that means:
    http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/17/opinion/cardona-binders-women/index.htm

    edit: i suck at adding pics to MFP...
  • Danielle_2013
    Danielle_2013 Posts: 806 Member
    Sorry..I write too much. Long read.

    I admit it. The word “feminist” tends to make me uneasy.

    In the Western world, first and second waves of feminism have already achieved a great deal for women in regards to suffrage, official legal rights and autonomy, workplace, sexual and reproductive freedoms. It can be argued that there is still work to be done, but women today have grown up with (and take for granted?) many of these freedoms already. However, just because society has granted women equality on paper, it does not necessarily mean that it isn’t full of hidden mechanisms which hinder women from using their rights in practice. Additionally, it is quite clear that popular culture, language, and social expectations do not always reflect this sense of supposedly already achieved gender equality.

    What is interesting about modern day feminism though is that it refuses to be defined in such obvious ways. We can’t all necessarily point to the specific issue that feminists are fighting for in 2012. Perhaps we can all agree that the world is a more complicated place now.. and thus it becomes more difficult to separate gender issues from those of race, sex, class and political issues. This “third-wave” of feminism then seems to be more focused on allowing women to define feminism for themselves by incorporating their own identities into the belief system of what feminism is and what it can become through one's own perspective.

    This makes it inheritently subjective, and therefore is a distinct and purposeful move away from a unified force and ideal as per historical feminist movements. Being subjective also means that it is much more likely to be highly personal, contradictory and potentially hypocritical or flawed, as we humans (male and female) all tend to be at times.

    Personally, my version of feminism is focused on gender equality..and by that I mean equality for both men and women. I have no desire to think of myself as a victim, bitter and angry and/or feel any need to engage in male-bashing. I recognize that men have had more privileges historically, but by no means has their collective experience been without hardships, responsibility and complexity.

    Women are different than men, and I feel it does a disservice to both sexes to think otherwise. What it really boils down to for me is choice. Why would we limit ourselves to such black and white definitions of gender, when it is becoming clear that the world and we who live in it are becoming significantly more complex? Personally, I celebrate both men and women’s multiple and sometimes contradictory identities.

    So yes.. this means I expect to have my cake and eat it too. I will continue to expect legal and social equality, fair pay and reproductive choice, while also choosing to date someone a little more dominant, who might enjoy opening a door or paying for a meal if he chooses. This also means for me personally that I fully expect/desire to work full time and if my partner is a better cook or more nurturing, then perhaps he would work less outside of the home and fulfill a more domestic role if desired.

    To me.. this choice and ability to live life the way I want to IS the new definition of feminism. But I believe in the same rights for men as well. And I believe this concept is still relevant and important today for both sexes because the word "feminist" is still used as an insult by those who don't really understand it.
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    So... Since you're "laughing out loud", I guess you don't think there are domains in which men are discriminated?
    The world is not fair, never will be. Overall, men have made out incredibly well. And the numbers back that up. So for white men to start whining about discrimination, well... Sorry, it's just not my style.
    --P
    It's good for you that it is not your style, but that doesn't make the whole debate topic and direction chosen by the OP invalid - OP, who let's remember opened this thread and chose to look at the problem under this specific angle.
    I played the game and replied to OP from this standpoint.

    Now, I agree with you (and I would say that probably everyone here agrees as well) that the problem of the discrimination of women is bigger than the problem of the discrimination of men, as numbers back that up.
    Similarly though, there are worse problems than the condition of women in Western world societies but that doesn't and shouldn't make the debate about the condition of women invalid either.

    As far as whining, I very much doubt you've seen me whining about this issue since I'm perfectly aware that women get the short straw.
    But eh, it's a purely intellectual exercise to debate about this topic, isn't it? :wink:

    You're absolutely right, Flim, there are instances of discrimination against all genders and races, including white men. Just because it's not as obvious, common, or "bad" (arbitrary terminology, I am aware and I apologize) that doesn't make it right, or worth ignoring.

    Equality is as equality does. Just as much as it means equal opportunity, it means no special treatment based on any prejudices. It is the choices that we make in life that define who we are and should determine where we go, not what we are born with.
  • MikeM53082
    MikeM53082 Posts: 1,199 Member

    What is interesting about modern day feminism though is that it refuses to be defined in such obvious ways. We can’t all necessarily point to the specific issue that feminists are fighting for in 2012. Perhaps we can all agree that the world is a more complicated place now.. and thus it becomes more difficult to separate gender issues from those of race, sex, class and political issues. This “third-wave” of feminism then seems to be more focused on allowing women to define feminism for themselves by incorporating their own identities into the belief system of what feminism is and what it can become through one's own perspective.

    This makes it inherently subjective, and therefore is a distinct and purposeful move away from a unified force and ideal as per historical feminist movements. Being subjective also means that it is much more likely to be highly personal, contradictory and potentially hypocritical or flawed, as we humans (male and female) all tend to be at times.

    Interesting.

    So this third wave of feminism is very subjective to the individual? I think I stated earlier that some women might think an action is blatantly sexist, while others won't at all.

    I've always acted the same and I have never once been called sexist until I logged on here. Maybe women I interact with just think "Oh that's Michael just being Michael" and giggle and brush it off.
  • oddyogi
    oddyogi Posts: 1,816 Member
    I don't have time to read through all the posts as I have to get ready for work, BUT keep in mind not all women haven't "fought" for the rights to be drafted, work in the coal mines, etc. I would have fought for that right, but I enrolled voluntarily in the military (as did JJ and probably a few other ladies on this board).

    99% of a group will fight for something positive, such as the right to vote, but probably barely even half would fight for something that would put them in danger. It's just human instincts.
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member

    What is interesting about modern day feminism though is that it refuses to be defined in such obvious ways. We can’t all necessarily point to the specific issue that feminists are fighting for in 2012. Perhaps we can all agree that the world is a more complicated place now.. and thus it becomes more difficult to separate gender issues from those of race, sex, class and political issues. This “third-wave” of feminism then seems to be more focused on allowing women to define feminism for themselves by incorporating their own identities into the belief system of what feminism is and what it can become through one's own perspective.

    This makes it inherently subjective, and therefore is a distinct and purposeful move away from a unified force and ideal as per historical feminist movements. Being subjective also means that it is much more likely to be highly personal, contradictory and potentially hypocritical or flawed, as we humans (male and female) all tend to be at times.

    Interesting.

    So this third wave of feminism is very subjective to the individual? I think I stated earlier that some women might think an action is blatantly sexist, while others won't at all.

    I've always acted the same and I have never once been called sexist until I logged on here. Maybe women I interact with just think "Oh that's Michael just being Michael" and giggle and brush it off.

    Mike, once again you have completely blown off my answers to this and instead focused on a different response that seemed to corroborate with your preconceived ideas.

    While there are people that identify as feminists that believe there should be a minimum amount of women in each work environment, those type of people push for special treatment instead of equality. In an equal environment it has more to do with one's abilities than their gender. That is sexist in that it is preferential to women.

    There was a movement to reduce the standards for SWAT and firefighters, because people felt like the qualifications to get such jobs were too high for "enough" women to pass. Instead of acknowledging that certain feats of strength and endurance are more common in men (but still possible for a woman that works equally hard), they contemplated lowering the standard and therefore lowering the quality of what those jobs are supposed to function as. I do not agree with that, it's sexist.

    I think the biggest problem is people are equating feminism to sexism, and there is clearly a difference. Feminism is individually defined, but sexism is clear. It is when you show prejudice (either for or against) a person based solely on their gender.
  • MikeM53082
    MikeM53082 Posts: 1,199 Member

    Mike, once again you have completely blown off my answers to this and instead focused on a different response that seemed to corroborate with your preconceived ideas.

    Nobody is blowing you off. I don't know why you keep on saying that..

    Not everyone is going to comment on every single one of your posts. Believe me, if I have something to add or ask you a question, I'll quote you and proceed with my statement.

    I thought what smallerbridesmaids was interesting and had a follow up question for her. Pretty cut and dry, no?

    Am I allowed to comment and converse with others on here?
  • Danielle_2013
    Danielle_2013 Posts: 806 Member
    Mike... personally I think the concept of feminism is subjective to the individual. But I suppose Kitsune is right in that sexism is defined as prejudice or discrimination based on sex or gender; or conditions or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex.

    So.. does this mean I am okay with sexism because I don't find you offensive and feel you just express personal opinions albeit sometimes traditional/hilarious/misguided/awesome ones? Huh. Must go away and consider this.

    As response to the draft/US politics stuff...hell no, I don't ever want to be drafted.. I would rather be barefoot and pregnant thanks and bring you beers and *kitten* for the rest of my life than go to any kind of war.
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member

    Mike, once again you have completely blown off my answers to this and instead focused on a different response that seemed to corroborate with your preconceived ideas.

    Nobody is blowing you off. I don't know why you keep on saying that..

    Not everyone is going to comment on every single one of your posts. Believe me, if I have something to add or ask you a question, I'll quote you and proceed with my statement.

    I thought what smallerbridesmaids was interesting and had a follow up question for her. Pretty cut and dry, no?

    Am I allowed to comment and converse with others on here?

    You know what?

    I just don't want to spell it out anymore.

    I thought the whole point of this thread was to share ideas and debate each other as intellectuals, clearing up misconstrued interpretations. The only way we can do that is to actually have some kind of back and forth rhetoric (Prahasaurus and I managed it just fine, though we did manage to go off topic). It seems I was mistaken. I'm not interested in hearing one sided soap boxes, that truly is a road to nowhere.

    And now back to our regularly scheduled program.
  • dbrightwell1270
    dbrightwell1270 Posts: 1,732 Member
    It's been 30 minutes and whoever is providing our regularly scheduled program hasn't said anything. Are you going to accuse them of ignoring your posts too? :bigsmile: :laugh:
  • jenbit
    jenbit Posts: 4,251 Member
    It's been 30 minutes and whoever is providing our regularly scheduled program hasn't said anything. Are you going to accuse them of ignoring your posts too? :bigsmile: :laugh:

    Sometime you are very bad for my computer screen. I just spit water on it while laughing thank you lol :laugh:


    The problem with things like Sexism and feminism is that they are subjective to the person. One person may not see anything wrong with a statement or way of thought while another person might take it as a personal afront to an entire sex.
  • DMZ_1
    DMZ_1 Posts: 2,889 Member
    "Isms" in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an "ism", he should believe in himself. -Ferris Bueller
  • dbrightwell1270
    dbrightwell1270 Posts: 1,732 Member
    "Isms" in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an "ism", he should believe in himself. -Ferris Bueller

    Isn't that the definition of narcissism?
  • Mellie289
    Mellie289 Posts: 1,191 Member
    This is the official sexism thread. If there is another sexism thread, please re-direct them here. As per a handful of requests, we'll contain all sexism related question within this single thread.

    I posted this yesterday:

    "I don't think it's high school drama at all. I think this is a wonderful discussion about equal right, sexism, etc.

    Without debates like this.. women might never have had the right to vote or go to college or even be allowed in the workplace, so I think it's a worthwhile conversation to have.

    I do have one genuine question (not being a wise guy here), but why are women so selective when it comes to fighting for their rights?

    Consider the following:
    Women fought for the right to vote and elect our leaders into office. Yet, they didn't fight for their right to be drafted into the army and fight in the Vietnam War. Over 50,000 young men died in the Vietman War.

    Women fought for their right to be able to enter the work force. Yet, they didn't fight for the right to work in the coal mines (they were prohibited) back when they were thriving in the very early 1900's. Hundreds of young men died in the mines.

    And to this date, only men are required to enroll in the selective service (in case of another draft) or they won't be able to get student loans, a government job, etc.

    So why have women, over the years, only fought for selected rights and not others?"

    I would love to get anyone's insight into this.
    Reading the OP and subsequent comments, particularly about the draft brought this thought to my head after thinking about the movie Private Benjamin with Goldie Hawn:

    While I can see the value of putting the Kardashians, Paris Hilton and Snookie on the front line, perhaps that's not going to be the most effective military. Women and men are different - biologically and in how we are raised and conditioned by society. When girls are raised to not play with Barbie dolls and want to grow and paint their nails, and are pushed to play American football instead, you might get women who are more likely to contribute effectively to things like military service in times of draft. While I do understand that most men are not raised to become soldiers (although some do choose that path), fewer women would be equipped to handle the job and I think would be more of a liability.

    Expecting equal pay for doing the same work, to the same level of competence as a man, is just fairness as there is no difference in ability and performance, so the work should be compensated equally. I am a feminist and I expect my work to be valued, my salary to be equal, and my prospects for advancement in the workplace to be fair and the same as for my male colleagues. I recognize that I am not physically the same as them and my have challenges that could impact my advancement, like if I do have children (something that tends to have a greater impact on the careers of women than men, although not always the case). I recognize that I am not as strong as men, so there are some jobs that I wouldn't be good at - fortunately, the job I do doesn't require much heavy lifting and I've got lots of 20-something young men around to do that for me when necessary. I just need someone at home now to help me get those dang jars open!

    I agree that being drafted is not a right - why would women fight for that - particularly as we're talking about an age range that for many women is their child-bearing years? I just don't even understand that as an argument for sexism from women, if that was what the sexism was referring to in the title (I'm not even sure).
  • MikeM53082
    MikeM53082 Posts: 1,199 Member
    Reading the OP and subsequent comments, particularly about the draft brought this thought to my head after thinking about the movie Private Benjamin with Goldie Hawn:

    While I can see the value of putting the Kardashians, Paris Hilton and Snookie on the front line, perhaps that's not going to be the most effective military. Women and men are different - biologically and in how we are raised and conditioned by society. When girls are raised to not play with Barbie dolls and want to grow and paint their nails, and are pushed to play American football instead, you might get women who are more likely to contribute effectively to things like military service in times of draft. While I do understand that most men are not raised to become soldiers (although some do choose that path), fewer women would be equipped to handle the job and I think would be more of a liability.

    Expecting equal pay for doing the same work, to the same level of competence as a man, is just fairness as there is no difference in ability and performance, so the work should be compensated equally. I am a feminist and I expect my work to be valued, my salary to be equal, and my prospects for advancement in the workplace to be fair and the same as for my male colleagues. I recognize that I am not physically the same as them and my have challenges that could impact my advancement, like if I do have children (something that tends to have a greater impact on the careers of women than men, although not always the case). I recognize that I am not as strong as men, so there are some jobs that I wouldn't be good at - fortunately, the job I do doesn't require much heavy lifting and I've got lots of 20-something young men around to do that for me when necessary. I just need someone at home now to help me get those dang jars open!

    I agree that being drafted is not a right - why would women fight for that - particularly as we're talking about an age range that for many women is their child-bearing years? I just don't even understand that as an argument for sexism from women, if that was what the sexism was referring to in the title (I'm not even sure).

    I think everyone on here agrees that if a man and women do the identical job and produce the identical results, their pay should be the same. No one is going to argue that.

    In my organization, both the men and women have equal pay based on experience and the level are at. I'm sure not all large organizations like this, but in line of work, men and women are paid identical. In fact, our general counsel is entirely female. Most of our management structure is female as well.

    Theoretical example here. Should the pay be equal if a man and a woman do the same job, yet the man produces much better results. Take a blue collar job where a man moves a 30 lbs box from point A to point B. During the course of the day, the man moves twice as many boxes as the female. Even though they both give a lot of effort, the man moves twice as many boxes. Should he get twice the pay?
  • Mellie289
    Mellie289 Posts: 1,191 Member
    Theoretical example here. Should the pay be equal if a man and a woman do the same job, yet the man produces much better results. Take a blue collar job where a man moves a 30 lbs box from point A to point B. During the course of the day, the man moves twice as many boxes as the female. Even though they both give a lot of effort, the man moves twice as many boxes. Should he get twice the pay?
    I think this theoretical examples isn't gender-related. There are piecemeal jobs where people get paid by the quantity of things they make (or maybe in your example, by number of boxes they move). A young, fit woman may be able to move many more boxes in the course of a day than someone nearing retirement who has a bad back.
  • DMZ_1
    DMZ_1 Posts: 2,889 Member
    In my organization, both the men and women have equal pay based on experience and the level are at. I'm sure not all large organizations like this, but in line of work, men and women are paid identical. In fact, our general counsel is entirely female. Most of our management structure is female as well.

    That has always been my work experience.
  • DMZ_1
    DMZ_1 Posts: 2,889 Member
    In my organization, both the men and women have equal pay based on experience and the level are at. I'm sure not all large organizations like this, but in line of work, men and women are paid identical. In fact, our general counsel is entirely female. Most of our management structure is female as well.

    That has always been my work experience.
    "Isms" in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an "ism", he should believe in himself. -Ferris Bueller

    Isn't that the definition of narcissism?

    Not necessarily narcissism. A belief in oneself isn't narcissism. I equate a belief in oneself to healthy self esteem.
  • Mellie289
    Mellie289 Posts: 1,191 Member
    In my organization, both the men and women have equal pay based on experience and the level are at. I'm sure not all large organizations like this, but in line of work, men and women are paid identical. In fact, our general counsel is entirely female. Most of our management structure is female as well.

    That has always been my work experience.
    This has been my experience too, but the fact remains that in the USA (as well as other countries), many women do make less than men doing the same job, necessitating things like the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
  • Carl01
    Carl01 Posts: 9,301 Member
    First off I want to thank everybody for how they conducted themselves today in this thread with several contentious issues being raised...it shows that it can be done.
    I really do want to look at a thread to see if it is interesting rather then to see if it is a knock down,drag out
    That is the official stuff...nuff of that.

    Now my opinions as a person on the overall issues.

    The entire issue of what is or what is not sexist to me is a matter of personal experience coloring their opinion on it.
    To some a given thing clearly is,no questions asked but to others they scratch their heads.
    I admit that some things ladies view as sexist I sometimes don`t see.
    That is a part of what we all have lived and do admit as a guy I may not be sensitive to things that I have not experienced.
    On the other hand some things may be a person determined to find it where it does not exist.
    The need to be open minded and calm as well as respectful and attentive usually will win out I think.

    I have said on here more then once the desire for equality always ends when the reality of it is a disadvantage rather then a gain.
    That is human nature and will never change and is not gender specific.
    Yes that can be annoying to a guy when after decades of being told all are equal we read here that ladies do not wish equality in relationship building but it is not going to change.

    As far as military service goes or any other occupation I want the person to qualify for the task regardless of gender.
    If a given job requires physical strength that the average lady does not have then I don`t want her subjected to it.
    That in some circles may be regarded as sexist but I don`t care and neither does life.

    Yes parenthood issues favors the mother so it has been for centuries for some valid reasons and some presumed ones.
    That is likely never to change so I guess it is a deal with it thing.
    On the other hand this situation will always have a negative affect in the workplace for economic issues and not sexist ones imo so as well it is what is.

    Are there areas where a guy has an advantage and happy he does...yes
    Are there areas where a woman does and happy she does...yes
    Are there areas where either will feel they are treated unfairly...yes.

    Such is life,I am a believer of having an opinion,do what one can to advocate for it but also live the life that is served up despite its flaws as we see them.
  • kerrymh
    kerrymh Posts: 912 Member
    Sorry..I write too much. Long read.

    I admit it. The word “feminist” tends to make me uneasy.

    In the Western world, first and second waves of feminism have already achieved a great deal for women in regards to suffrage, official legal rights and autonomy, workplace, sexual and reproductive freedoms. It can be argued that there is still work to be done, but women today have grown up with (and take for granted?) many of these freedoms already. However, just because society has granted women equality on paper, it does not necessarily mean that it isn’t full of hidden mechanisms which hinder women from using their rights in practice. Additionally, it is quite clear that popular culture, language, and social expectations do not always reflect this sense of supposedly already achieved gender equality.

    What is interesting about modern day feminism though is that it refuses to be defined in such obvious ways. We can’t all necessarily point to the specific issue that feminists are fighting for in 2012. Perhaps we can all agree that the world is a more complicated place now.. and thus it becomes more difficult to separate gender issues from those of race, sex, class and political issues. This “third-wave” of feminism then seems to be more focused on allowing women to define feminism for themselves by incorporating their own identities into the belief system of what feminism is and what it can become through one's own perspective.

    This makes it inheritently subjective, and therefore is a distinct and purposeful move away from a unified force and ideal as per historical feminist movements. Being subjective also means that it is much more likely to be highly personal, contradictory and potentially hypocritical or flawed, as we humans (male and female) all tend to be at times.

    Personally, my version of feminism is focused on gender equality..and by that I mean equality for both men and women. I have no desire to think of myself as a victim, bitter and angry and/or feel any need to engage in male-bashing. I recognize that men have had more privileges historically, but by no means has their collective experience been without hardships, responsibility and complexity.

    Women are different than men, and I feel it does a disservice to both sexes to think otherwise. What it really boils down to for me is choice. Why would we limit ourselves to such black and white definitions of gender, when it is becoming clear that the world and we who live in it are becoming significantly more complex? Personally, I celebrate both men and women’s multiple and sometimes contradictory identities.

    So yes.. this means I expect to have my cake and eat it too. I will continue to expect legal and social equality, fair pay and reproductive choice, while also choosing to date someone a little more dominant, who might enjoy opening a door or paying for a meal if he chooses. This also means for me personally that I fully expect/desire to work full time and if my partner is a better cook or more nurturing, then perhaps he would work less outside of the home and fulfill a more domestic role if desired.

    To me.. this choice and ability to live life the way I want to IS the new definition of feminism. But I believe in the same rights for men as well. And I believe this concept is still relevant and important today for both sexes because the word "feminist" is still used as an insult by those who don't really understand it.

    Agree with this
  • christine24t
    christine24t Posts: 6,063 Member
    As far as military service goes or any other occupation I want the person to qualify for the task regardless of gender.
    If a given job requires physical strength that the average lady does not have then I don`t want her subjected to it.
    That in some circles may be regarded as sexist but I don`t care and neither does life.

    Agreed.

    I am a nurse. Nursing has traditionally been thought of a more "female" career, although I personally think that is BS. However, men are needed in nursing. Men are just as caring in many aspects, male patients might be more comfortable with a male nurse, and men often are physically stronger than women which is good for lifting patients and assisting patients with other tasks. So in fact a male is just as suited for a traditionally female career.
    Yes parenthood issues favors the mother so it has been for centuries for some valid reasons and some presumed ones.
    That is likely never to change so I guess it is a deal with it thing.

    Well, even think about what Mitt Romney said at the last debate. He was willing to work with a female staffer (after he found her in a binder of women lol) so she could get home in time for dinner. He, nor most other people would never say that about a man. Was it sexist? Yes. A girl I went to high school with posted a good status about it. "I guess Mitt Romney thinks I should be home in time to make dinner for my kids."

    I saw another meme that is supposedly from Mitt Romney (but it is a joke just so no one gets offended). It says "I believe in feminism...I let my wife make whatever she wants for dinner." LOL
    Are there areas where a guy has an advantage and happy he does...yes
    Are there areas where a woman does and happy she does...yes
    Are there areas where either will feel they are treated unfairly...yes.

    Good way to put it.
    I went to college, got a degree and jumped in to the work force because I didn't have a choice. I didn't have men falling all over me willing to take care of me. So it was either mooch off my parents or make a life for MYSELF. If I met someone today that said "Baby, quit your job and stay home and take care of me", I'd be like YES PLEASE. I'm too old now to be a "sugar baby" so I'm pretty much stuck waiting for my night and shining armor to come along and treat me like the queen I deserve to be.

    But unfortunately, this is only something I dream out. It's not reality. Unless I want to live in a cardboard box on the street corner I need to go to work, provide for myself and be independent.

    I think we should be treated equal, but we are not the same gender and we need to keep that mind, especially interacting with the opposite sex.

    I would love it if I met a guy and was able to quit working and keep a house and raise our kids and be able to afford it. However, I know that's not realistic...so that is why, like you, I went to college and got a good job so I can support myself, and I have a career to fall back on.

    We all talked a while back about "independent" and "strong" women. I am independent because I have to be, but I would love to be able to depend on someone and have them depend on me. In contrast, there are some women who never want to depend on someone, emotionally and financially.
  • AnnaPixie
    AnnaPixie Posts: 7,439 Member
    Theoretical example here. Should the pay be equal if a man and a woman do the same job, yet the man produces much better results. Take a blue collar job where a man moves a 30 lbs box from point A to point B. During the course of the day, the man moves twice as many boxes as the female. Even though they both give a lot of effort, the man moves twice as many boxes. Should he get twice the pay?

    The actual definition of equal work for equal pay is:

    "employers may not pay unequal wages to men and women who perform jobs that require substantially equal skill, effort and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions within the same establishment."

    Therefore, if the guy is shifting more boxes than the woman the effort isnt equal, is it?

    I dont think any woman would be fighting for EQUAL pay for doing half the job! :noway:

    Well, unless she's really clever!!! :laugh:

    Now, if the woman is shifting the same amount of boxes in the same amount of time, doesn't she deserve equal pay??

    I think you've had enough answers on the military and mining question. Women have always worked in mines and in wars. It was men that didnt want them on the front lines. That's slowly changing.

    The point is though Mike, is that women DON'T want to be MEN! That's where a lot of men get confused. All that women want is to have the same choices in life, and get rewarded for the same efforts. The word 'sexism' is ONLY defined against women. There isnt such a thing as sexism against men!

    100 years ago women not only couldnt vote, had no rights to sue or own property, get divorced, have a bank account, have have any say in any domestic decision or enjoy sex! A wife's only role was to love, honour and OBEY her husband And if she worked, her earnings belonged to their husband! As did her dowry or any inheritance :noway: Not only did he profit from her labour, he could have sex whenever he wanted as that was his 'right' and beat her whenever he deemed necessary; domestic violence was quite legal!!

    Women were 'inferior' in every sense of the word.

    Nowadays:

    We dont feel inferior when you open a car door for us, we feel privileged.

    We dont feel inferior when you pay for a date, we feel gratitude.

    We dont feel inferior when you walk on the traffic side of the street, we feel protected!

    We dont feel inferior when you want to take the dominant role in bed, we feel wanted and pleasured!

    You no longer TELL us what to do with our lives, you ASK us and DISCUSS with us.

    Basically, anything that make us feel inferior - or that is ok for a man to do it, but not a woman - is wrong. Anything else goes!!

    I hope that clarifies a few things :flowerforyou:


    ETA: Not speaking for all women here, but that's pretty much how *I* see it :wink:
  • christine24t
    christine24t Posts: 6,063 Member
    The point is though Mike, is that women DON'T want to be MEN! That's where a lot of men get confused. All that women want is to have the same choices in life, and get rewarded for the same efforts.

    Exactly...you worded what I wanted to really say!
    We dont feel inferior when you open a car door for us, we feel privileged.

    We dont feel inferior when you pay for a date, we feel gratitude.

    We dont feel inferior when you walk on the traffic side of the street, we feel protected!

    We dont feel inferior when you want to take the dominant role in bed, we feel wanted and pleasured!

    You no longer TELL us what to do with our lives, you ASK us and DISCUSS with us.

    Basically, anything that make us feel inferior - or that it's ok for a man to do it, but not a woman - is wrong. Anything else goes!!

    I hope that clarifies a few things :flowerforyou:

    LOVE THIS!
  • Carl01
    Carl01 Posts: 9,301 Member


    Nowadays:

    We dont feel inferior when you open a car door for us, we feel privileged.

    We dont feel inferior when you pay for a date, we feel gratitude.

    We dont feel inferior when you walk on the traffic side of the street, we feel protected!

    We dont feel inferior when you want to take the dominant role in bed, we feel wanted and pleasured!

    You no longer TELL us what to do with our lives, you ASK us and DISCUSS with us.

    Basically, anything that make us feel inferior - or that is ok for a man to do it, but not a woman - is wrong. Anything else goes!!

    I hope that clarifies a few things :flowerforyou:


    ETA: Not speaking for all women here, but that's pretty much how *I* see it :wink:

    Just to spur discussion...where is the line drawn between desiring much of those things and feeling entitled to them?
    Or how many ladies actually do regard it,as you say,in a positive light but in reality react to the contrary of that...ie,if a guy does not meet the ladies standards he is instantly discarded?
  • christine24t
    christine24t Posts: 6,063 Member
    Just to spur discussion...where is the line drawn between desiring much of those things and feeling entitled to them?
    Or how many ladies actually do regard it,as you say,in a positive light but in reality react to the contrary of that...ie,if a guy does not meet the ladies standards he is instantly discarded?

    Just my opinion - but I don't feel entitled to it. The car door thing is cute, but is it a deal breaker? No. Traffic? No. The date thing though...is kinda a big deal to me. It shows you're a gentleman...men have traditionally done the wooing. It is in the man's nature to want to pursue the woman...woman usually don't get too far with a man that they pursued because men like to chase (even if they say they don't, I think it is all biological in our nature). Men want to want and women wanted to be wooed. Wanting to be wooed in is my nature. He would not be instantly discarded, but definitely would have to be a "WOW" in other categories to make up for it.
  • Danielle_2013
    Danielle_2013 Posts: 806 Member
    Anna... LOVED it! And yes... wanting to be wooed and pursued is also in my nature. :wink:
This discussion has been closed.