Fitbit adjustment - overstated
pboroaddick
Posts: 29 Member
I have setup my Fitbit to sync with MFP. I only log food in MFP and use the Fitbit ChargeHR to record my exercise etc. The sync is working ok but each day I have a massive adjustment to calories from Fitbit e.g. Yesterday fitbit recorded 6285 steps and calories of 3201, this translated as a Fitbit adjustment in MFP of 1207 calories. as my daily allowance for calories is only 1240, if I were to eat the Fitbit calories I would be increasing weight.
Can anyone tell me how I need to adjust either MFP or Fitbit to provide a reasonable adjustment
Can anyone tell me how I need to adjust either MFP or Fitbit to provide a reasonable adjustment
0
Replies
-
I have the same issue. I believe my FitBit is awfully generous with my calorie expenditure. I shall lurk and see if anyone has any ideas. Are you sure your calories are set properly? I'm at 1210 and I'm a 190lb female so I was just wondering since you are a guy. Not trying to be nosy, but wondering if there may be an issue with your details and physical activity level setting.0
-
I usually eat all of my fitbit cals from my ChargeHR, if not more, and I am still losing. I have MFP set to sedentary, lose 1 lb a week, and plan to exercise 5 times a week for 30 mins. Fitbit is set to the same I think but I don't log my food there either. The ChargeHR factors in your heart rate to come up with a calories burned I think. Are you sure you will gain or are you just afraid you will? If you are just afraid that you will gain, you could experiment for a couple months with eating most of them back and see what happens.
0 -
I am 195lb and 5' 4" so my setting in MFP is correct for Sendentary. Before I had a couple of knee replacements I lost 2 stone averaging 1.5 pounds a weeek based on 1240 but eating back my exercise calories. The exercise calories in MFP would normally be about 500 or 1200 if playing golf. Within Fitbit if I play golf and check the calories it is about the same ie 1200. So something is wrong in the Fitbit settings I believe. But can not see where as I have set my stride length accurately and the food data from MFP is feeding back accurately as well.0
-
daily calorie burn is step based.
So I'd confirm that it's calculation of your stride length is correct since you have new knees and perhaps may not stride out the same as average - or maybe aren't anyway. Like longer/shorter legs than average your height.
How did you determine your stride length?
It should be based on average daily pace - not the extremes of the range like grocery store shuffle or exercise level walk. But the middle, and actually better to be more in what occurs the most.
Like just a serious daily walk pace on a known distance track - longer the better. Across a room is not good.
Start an activity record on Fitbit so it shows the distance for that. And try to hold to that non-exercise pace.
I'd also use that as opportunity to count maybe 100 right foot steps and confirm the Fitbit number went up by 200.
Also, the adjustment is based on what MFP thought you'd burn with your BMR and activity level, with no exercise.
Not your eating level.
Fitbit daily burn - MFP estimated daily burn = adjustment.
Eating goal + adjustment is actual eating goal (I know you got that part).
So Fitbit 3201 - 1207 adj = 1994 MFP daily burn.
1994 - 1240 eating goal = 754 deficit - which math rounding probably selected 1.5 lbs weekly.
1990 / 1.25 sedentary = 1592 Mifflin BMR being used. Might confirm that in MFP Tools for BMR calc using your stats.
So rest of the math sounds right (if BMR is confirmed) - it's merely the amount of adjustment based on distance and pace - which is all based on stride length setting and accuracy of steps seen.
Do you commonly carry anything of decent weight on daily walking at say work that would increase weight?
This could increase impact on steps leading Fitbit to think you could be jogging. Higher calorie burn there too.
Of course it should go up if that is case, just not that much.0 -
Good suggestion as i did my stride length in the house, so it may help to do a longer test as you suggest, thank you0