We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Garmin Varia Vision In-sight Display?

amandaeve
amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
edited November 2024 in Social Groups
Anyone have one? How do you like it?

Replies

  • Colorado1runner
    Colorado1runner Posts: 54 Member
    Have the vivoactive hr, I absolutely love this watch!
  • ntnunk
    ntnunk Posts: 936 Member
    A friend of mine has a Varia Vision. He absolutely loves it. I played with his a little, it's really pretty impressive. I just kinda still feel like they are overpriced.
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    Never tried one. I read DCR's review and was put off.

    https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2016/01/garmin-varia-vision-hud.html
  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    Interesting review. The Garmin website says it's compatible with thier watches. I can't imagine this being useful to the average person if they had an Edge too.
  • 35dollars
    35dollars Posts: 832 Member
    Never tried one. I read DCR's review and was put off.

    https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2016/01/garmin-varia-vision-hud.html

    I just read that, and I thought the review was pretty positive on the capability. It all fails on the price though, which is waaaay more than I would be willing to pay.

    I also think the whole HUD form-factor is still in the dark ages - the number of people who want to look like a Borg reject (or be seen looking like one) is pretty limited, and certainly doesn't include me. There really needs to be a revolution in miniaturisation or relocation of the electronics - for example, split the electrics into the stems of the glasses and projection from the rims of the lenses somehow.

    Mind you, I feel the same about bike helmet cameras, and there's plenty of people who are happy to ride around with a camera on top of their helmet, looking like a superannuated Tellytubby, so what do I know?
  • niblue
    niblue Posts: 339 Member
    35dollars wrote: »
    I just read that, and I thought the review was pretty positive on the capability. It all fails on the price though, which is waaaay more than I would be willing to pay.

    I agree. I like the idea of a HUD (and preferably one I can use when running as well as cycling) but that is too expensive.

  • ntnunk
    ntnunk Posts: 936 Member
    edited January 2017
    35dollars wrote: »
    I also think the whole HUD form-factor is still in the dark ages - the number of people who want to look like a Borg reject (or be seen looking like one) is pretty limited, and certainly doesn't include me. There really needs to be a revolution in miniaturisation or relocation of the electronics - for example, split the electrics into the stems of the glasses and projection from the rims of the lenses somehow.

    Something more like these, perhaps?

  • 35dollars
    35dollars Posts: 832 Member
    Yeah, that's much much better as a form-factor - they look like an over-elaborate set of shades rather than having a periscope strapped to the side of your head
  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    That Everysight looks pretty intriguing. I am looking for something to use in lieu of a bike computer, not in addition to, Everysight doesn't clarify which they are. Since the majority of my riding is in the dark or overcast weather, I would also need lens options. Looks promising enough, though I'm guessing the price point won't be any better. There is a big push for cycletourism now, arguing the average cyclist makes over $80k/yr, with 25% making over $100k, so there is little incentive for any company to sell low-priced cycling products. I can't imagine looking like a Borg would be much of a drawback, once one prominent pro wears one. Really, everything about cycling looks nerdy if you think about it.
  • ntnunk
    ntnunk Posts: 936 Member
    amandaeve wrote: »
    That Everysight looks pretty intriguing. I am looking for something to use in lieu of a bike computer, not in addition to, Everysight doesn't clarify which they are. Since the majority of my riding is in the dark or overcast weather, I would also need lens options. Looks promising enough, though I'm guessing the price point won't be any better. There is a big push for cycletourism now, arguing the average cyclist makes over $80k/yr, with 25% making over $100k, so there is little incentive for any company to sell low-priced cycling products. I can't imagine looking like a Borg would be much of a drawback, once one prominent pro wears one. Really, everything about cycling looks nerdy if you think about it.

    The Everysight glasses require a computer. They, like the varia, are essentially just a remote display. I *think* the only ones that might be stand-alone are the Recon Jets, but they suffer from the same "Periscope/Borg" affliction that the Varia system does. Or at least they did last time I looked.
  • amandaeve
    amandaeve Posts: 723 Member
    Yeah, I'm trying to find something that connects to a phone or a watch, as my other sensors do. I just don't have enough space on my handlebars for a gps bike computer.
  • ntnunk
    ntnunk Posts: 936 Member
    edited January 2017
    amandaeve wrote: »
    Yeah, I'm trying to find something that connects to a phone or a watch, as my other sensors do. I just don't have enough space on my handlebars for a gps bike computer.

    Depending on the watch, the Varia would connect to it. It's just a remote display. I know the Varia will connect to my Garmin Fenix, and should connect to the 920XT as well. Not sure about older Garmin or non-Garmin watches.

    Also, the more I read, I am starting to think the Everysight glasses are either standalone or phone-powered, not driven by the cycling computer. Info still scarce about it though.
This discussion has been closed.