humans and monogamy

SkateboardFi
SkateboardFi Posts: 1,322 Member
edited October 5 in Social Groups
are we biologically programmed to be with only one person? or has society molded us into these single-mate creatures?

Replies

  • KimmyEB
    KimmyEB Posts: 1,208 Member
    are we biologically programmed to be with only one person? or has society molded us into these single-mate creatures?

    OOOOO GOOD TOPIC! :happy:

    I'm honestly interested to know others responses.

    Personally, I've heard more arguments in favor of us being molded by society to be monogamous.
  • adrian_indy
    adrian_indy Posts: 1,444 Member
    I don't know. Monogomy seems to work for some, not for others. Society has deemed a great deal of morality around it, but that is before we knew that human beings had varying levels of testosterone from person to person. Maybe it was easier when the ancients made up rules about monogomy and marriage simply because the age of marriage was so young and life expectancy was so short. It's sort of easy to stay monogomous in a tribe of 40 people when you are married at 12 and die before you're thirty.
  • NPetrakis
    NPetrakis Posts: 164 Member
    I think some of us can't make that emotional connection at all. So for that individual it isn't a matter of beliefs so much as a psychological barrier to what we consider to be mainstream emotional attachments. Perhaps it's a survival instinct that was triggered during their life or the mechanism is active as part of another disorder? That person will have a plethora of relationships, as they define them, in their quest to make a connection.

    For the rest of us though, I think we're all looking for "the one". We may not admit it or even act like it's of value, but that goal is there consciously or otherwise. Even among polygamists around the world, they still have that closest companion which they will gravitate to. The person who most completes them or challenges their life. Polygamy in and of itself is neither right or wrong, adults will do what they will.

    For me, one is a mercy and the best choice. The obligations to 2 or 3 more adults would all but eliminate any time I value spending on my own pursuits, and that doesn't even include the additional children! That, or so little time is spent on the extended family that it has no meaning at all. I think monogamy is the most balanced approach.
  • poisongirl6485
    poisongirl6485 Posts: 1,487 Member
    My answer isn't very 'debate worthy' as I think it really depends on each person. It's really hard to say how someone would act if our society didn't 'look down' on people who are poly-amorous.

    To me, if the couple agree on an open-type relationship and have already set those boundaries (or non-boundaries, as it may be), then that's perfectly fine with me. If that is what works in their relationship, then who am I to say that they are wrong??

    Now do I think people should be allowed to be legally joined to multiple people? Ehhhh I don't think it would be a good idea simply because of the complications it would cause with contracts, medical issues, etc.
  • killerqueen17
    killerqueen17 Posts: 536 Member
    I don't have enough information on this topic to generalize, but I will say that for me personally, I have always been very monogamy-wired. I have always become very devoted and loyal to the person I was dating at the time, and was heartbroken when relationships ended, even if I could sense that they were deteriorating.

    I am ecstatic to now be married to a man who is very similar to me in that he wants a long-term relationship and will push through the hard times to make it work. I am so happy that I'm DONE with the dating/searching scene... for me, it was always very draining. I'd much rather be IN a solid relationship than on the prowl.

    Now in general, I do think that there are benefits to true monogamy-- i.e., no risk of STD's. Zero. (...this is in a hypothetical world where every single person is monogamous, and things like rape and adultery don't exist) Also, avoiding (or at least lessening) the heartbreak of a very involved relationship that ends poorly... that's another big plus in my book.
  • TheRoadDog
    TheRoadDog Posts: 11,788 Member
    I can only speak for myself. I am monogamous.

    Sure, I love to watch women. I love to speculate. I love to fantasize. I love to flirt. Then I go home to my wife.

    I'm pretty sure she feels the same way, but, even if she doesn't, I still believe in monogamy for me.

    We have our lists though (Like on Friends):

    Hers: Sam Elliot, Tom Selleck and Bradley Cooper.
    Mine: Amy Adams, Isabella Rossellini and Sofia Vergera.

    Free passes if we encouter them and they are willing. Pretty doubtful.
  • Society has programmed us to be monogamous in my opinion. By nature I think we, as a whole, are not monogamous. But for so many years monogamy has been presented to us as the thing to be, so most of us are.

    But then again, I also feel the opposite way. People all around the world are monogamous, so perhaps SOME people are programmed for it and SOME people aren't?? That might be a better way of thinking about it. And yet many societies even today are still not monogamous.

    Personally, I feel that people can be with however many people they want to be with. As long as all parties are willing participants and they are all legal, I see no problems with it.
  • BuffyEat2Live
    BuffyEat2Live Posts: 327 Member
    I know that I am a serial monogamist. I've gone from one long term serious relationship to another, always assuming that the person I was with was "the one".

    I don't know where that fits into this debate, or if it even does...

    I guess that I just speak for myself, and not for everyone. I want to find one mate and be with them for life.
  • castadiva
    castadiva Posts: 2,016 Member
    It's a very interesting question, and the society you grew up in has a lot to do with your answer. Many European countries (often Roman Catholic ones, interestingly, who one would expect to have more rigid moral codes) still view marriage as a one-to-one relationship, but accept, in fact, even expect, that one or both parties will have relationships outside the marriage. It's quite normal for a French couple, for example, to be very happily married, and for each person to have a lover, often of long-standing.

    I grew up in an anglo-saxon culture where monogamy within marriage was the norm, but I do wonder whether we create too much pressure on many marriages, through the ideal of a husband or wife who is everything to their partner. Perhaps fewer marriages would dissolve if adults were more able to have some part of their emotional needs at any given point in their life met by someone best suited to that particular moment. I don't mean promiscuous sexual relationships, but rather what one might call 'simultaneous monogamy'. The divorce rate is much lower in countries where this is an accepted norm.

    On a lighter note, all these relationships keep the lingerie business alive - I was in Paris yesterday, and there was a boutique almost every block!
  • Grimmerick
    Grimmerick Posts: 3,342 Member
    I believe people are meant to be monogomous.................................for a while, then that ends and they are monogomous with someone again........for a while. But it really just depends on the person and the circumstances.
  • suzycreamcheese
    suzycreamcheese Posts: 1,766 Member
    im really into monogamy but i dont think it suits everyone.
This discussion has been closed.