7268894 Member

Replies

  • Where shall we begin.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • I would be happy to do so friend.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Well, if you permit me some leeway here and forgo lengthy discourse on the physiological responses, the extra calories could be expended or retained. It depends on other factors not addressed yet. Really, check out DR Jason fung. He talks about all of this at length with ample scientific support
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Again, there are numerous physiological responses that take place and are necessarily paramount for the burning of fat and the sparing of other bodily tissues that occur when fasting. It isn't the reduction of calories that spurs this adaptive response either.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Pardon the typos.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Touché, but it isn't the reduction of calories that is the mechanism of weight lose when fasting. It the hormonal shift of insulin in repsonse to depleted glycogen stores that ultimate precipitates the use fat as the energy source in the absence of sugar. It isn't the restriction of calories. Numerous studies will and do…
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Not eating is fasting. That isn't caloric reduction. That is not eating. The net effect may or may not be a reduction in total caloric intake upon the cease fast.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • The physiological effects of fasting and a that of caloric restriction is verifiably different. I could go on and on. But I would rather you folks who stand upon the "pulpit" of caloric restriction as primary, CRAP, do you due diligence and look at the science. This do it as well as many others present and past are spot on.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Educate yourself. Google Dr Jason Fung.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • You are confusing caloric restriction with fasting.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • The long term effect of caloric restriction, simplifying this terribly, will result in reduced metabolic expenditure. Put another way, you metabolism will slow down.
    in How bad is it to eat under your calories? (1,200) Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • No, it really is failed science. Hundred plus years of research to prove it too.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • No.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Intermittent fasting. Google Dr Jason Fung for more information. It's beyond simple and the efficacy is backed by a numerous studies too boot.
    in Is this amount really realistic for me to lose weight?! Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Yes.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Again, Jason Fung. Fewer calories is failed science perpetuated by ignorance and greed. Doomed to fail. Think biggest loser. They always gain it back
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • Hi again, Jason Fung, intermittent fasting and "The Obesity Code". He has numerous videos on YouTube and his website to boot.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
  • It really is the only lasting method. Google Jason fung. It will change your life.
    in Fasting Comment by 7268894 April 2017
Avatar