Replies
-
Not looking for an exact answer to this because none of us can truly address this with certainty (at least I can't pretend to)- but I do wonder why obesity was much rarer in the times when we had no idea what a calorie was.
-
I guess I'm trying to steer the discussion away from that godforesaken creamer. Hard to believe such an infantesmal portion of one's diet can have any significant effects with other variables kept constant. I think we all agree on that. How you are addressing the topic is more useful I think. Language can often be…
-
Yeah, it's Sisson's Primal that has worked for me. It doesn't just focus on diet however - it's more of an integrative approach.
-
Haha, yeah definitely not. :) But to be constructive, the ensuing discussion probably should have gone broader
-
I understand your sentiment actually. On the surface, I completely agree with calling any whole foods "bad", and that certainly sounds offputting from a common sense perspective, as it doesn't jive with the sentiment of the principles of ancestral eating. There are many nuances, however, and some versions of the diet have…
-
Just my 0.02$ Crusading, bad. Zealotry, bad. Dietary evalgelism, bad. I think we all agree on that. But it's the PEOPLE that carry out these behaviors, not the diet. So it seems contradictory to say that there's nothing wrong with these people. Calling a diet "absurd" and the people "misguided" seems to carry connotations…
-
I think the overall sentiment of OP's post was intended to be extrapolated to a generalization along the lines of "Some people have experienced that WHAT your diet is comprised of may make a difference towards health and fat loss."
-
I really like primal paleo. I've done it for about 3.5 years and life has never been better!
