AussieEevee Member

Replies

  • Because sugar = energy = stored energy = fat Less sugar = less energy = burning fat for energy 1.8m, roughly 275kg at a guess (I have no way to reliably measure this. Which is frustrating), 29 Have a look at my diary again. I'm not severely under-eating. I had 3 weetbix plus milk for breakfast (Which is a normal sized…
  • I don't monitor... nor care about calories. The only macronutrient I monitor is sugar intake, and I royally screwed up my diet today. I'm guessing the estimate would probably be 300kg in 5 weeks (If every day is like today), but the system won't tell me. Stats? As in vitals? No idea, but scales that have a 250kg capacity…
Avatar