Replies
-
Hello, Coleteo. It's the only one I've tried, so I can't compare it to others. Having said that, Yes, I would recommend it.
-
I'd say at least eat close to your 1200. And if you're still hungry (or just want to treat yourself) in the evening, use the extra calorie allotment as a store to pull from. If you weigh every day, like I do, and you're running a big calorie deficit, you'll see it pretty quickly. A little more calorie deficit than you're…
-
Hello All, I also just bought a Polar A300! And I think it's great! I bought the one without the chest strap, so that I could buy the H10 chest strap instead of the H7. Maybe we're getting close to a critical mass of A300 users, and we can get this group hopping!
-
I wouldn't discount wrist mounted monitors entirely, but the technology used to capture the HR is different, and apparently starts to lose accuracy when you're going all out. So I much prefer the chest strap as well. And especially important to those of us over sixty...
-
By the way, you were just winded? I'd be laying on the ground gasping... LOL
-
Not a problem, indeed. From what I've read, that formula falls apart at our age. Some Norwegian researchers have come up with one that works better. 211 minus 64% of AGE. Here's the url: http://www.ntnu.edu/cerg/hrmax
-
Good luck, Janie. If you think this might help, give it a try. Think of logging your food like it's one of those game apps that people play on their phones! If someone asks you what you're doing, tell them, "I'm playing my game! I just have to log one more meal to get to the next level!" And then reward yourself in real…
-
Hello Reaver, I bought a Polar A300 fitness tracker watch and a Polar H10 HR sensor (chest strap) when I started up just recently, hoping that they would do for me, exactly what you have in mind for yourself. Maybe not at the same intensity, though. (There's certainly no P90 in my username.) :smile: The idea is that when…
