ElizabethRoad Member

It's fine as long as your total calories are less than you burn. I've usually heard it as King, Prince, and Pauper. But either way it doesn't make sense. Don't you think a Queen or Prince would get as lavish a meal as a King?

That's up to you, isn't it? There's no way to figure the chances of it...

Sounds fine to me. I can't imagine them having a problem with it - but if they do, they stole your idea, so they wouldn't have any right to be annoyed.

Isn't she one of those pageant kids?

I don't think it's unrealistic at all. But that isn't the point - posting this thread took way more time and effort than removing the easily customizable thing that was bothering you. It's very silly. Do you expect them to somehow cater to your specific needs without you having to do a thing?

Lol. Why would you go on a rant about a generic limit that you can change to whatever you want?

Are you expecting him to start spending that kind of time in the gym just because you asked?

Gonna guess you don't.

Learn what words mean before you use them.

I understand the question perfectly. I'm just telling you it's stupid.

Someone should have taught you that food left out in the breakroom is there for people to take. Don't blame your mistake on other people.

Haha first of all Fox news is not proof, and if you think that story supports what you just said you should go back and read it again.

All of those are unnatural. There's really no way to argue that.

*snort*

Seriously, though, you're just messing with me, right? You have to know the difference between "anti-intellectual" and "unintelligent". At least when the word is right there in front of your face.

OP, to be honest it seems like you had a half-formed idea and posted it because you were bored, and now you're defending your nebulous point for entertainment.

I wish I had known we were BOTH raging slobs. I don't know what I would have done about it though.

You were a bit more succinct, though.

You're coming across as anti-intellectual because of statements like this: "All studies are the same to me." Now, when one study has certain results, and a hack reporter draws his own faulty conclusions from it just to get a provocative story, and then people start throwing it around as proof of their own crackpot…

Best in terms of taste?

So anecdotal evidence is good, but if you take a large body of anecdotes and put them together, it stops being valid?

Yes. Minor mistakes don't matter so much, but being able to express yourself clearly is very important.

They put the worst people on all reality shows. It's done on purpose to get you to watch.

What's stopping you?

Because they aren't you. You are an individual and you obviously have some kind of issue they don't have. Low blood pressure, and low blood sugar are two things that spring to mind. It would be easy to get your doctor to check these out. Unfortunately the best you can get without seeing your doctor is just guesses at what…

It's not necessarily the words that are said. It's the tone, and the person they are coming from. In the thread you're talking about, many of those would have been fine in different circumstances.

Almost everyone gets cheese, so that is abnormal. Sauces aren't "bad for you" if you eat them in moderation. You're the one who chose to go to Subway every day. How is that Subway's fault? You are standing right there, tell them how much you want. Of course they want you to buy more things. They are in business to make…

If she stumbles on the way down, wouldn't she just fall into him and knock him down? Unless he's walking backwards.

Me, he is slow.

I found this one that shows the BMI rather than percentages. http://www.insureme.com/insurance/bmi-index-state I beat all of them. Every state except Utah is in the overweight range.