MrTolerable Member

^sigh...your obviously not a thinker...

ahh.. well don't do that! what is it?!

more so than you even realize..

omg. WHAT DA FAQ. -if you can't relate and exhibit NO OVEREXCITABIITIES YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO EVEN UNDERSTAND THIS! Much less provide me any light on it. The example is yourself! YOU! YOUR LIFE EXPERIENCE! The MILITARY! Have you not seen my thoughts on herd and collective thinking?! I of course have nothing wrong with…

No? that has not been my point? Entirely shocking. Like shocking- as in I get goosebumps at these assumptions that are undertaken not by a person but by the herd. Just shocking.

I totally agree with him, I'm not boasting about my IQ - the TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIFTED! Da FAQ?! How does this BASIC BASIC observation get lost on SO many of you? And I get grief for using the word SIMPLETON?!

Positive disintegration? o.O

^ I think in actuality - I'm talking in constructs - abstracts - there is simply not a capacity for them to even understand because they have no true 'self' to even have internal dialogue and debate about my points. - they are stuck in a collective and can't see the folly in it - in fact they can't see much of anything. To…

'pulling me apart left and right' - I've reanalyzed all of my post on MFP over and over. Researching the average makeup - the anonymity enables me to observe them just being them - and in a sense their ideal form of them self - what they seek most to portray - consciously or not. If a fellow thinker were to stumble onto…

yet - I repeat once again. I received no denouncement, not an iota of even a pause for me to reconsider or elaborate. I welcome and have welcomed diversity and questioning of the positions I put forth - yet no one made a single case. I was expecting at least 1-2% of the participants to actually help me. Ironically, the…

Sadly, I was begging for a denouncement - yet I received NONE.

...

We've all spent too much time in the psychosphere. laterz

LMAO! - if my grammatical blunders is what constitutes being taken seriously or not I will be sure to slave over every sentence structure. However, I think for the fellow thinkers out there - my points came across accurately.

There won't be another next time for MFP you already served your utility. - Some of you have helped a great deal though! :flowerforyou: The accusations of thinking collectively? - Well, frankly I'm happy to see are even coming across as accusatory.

I referenced Nietzsche's point of the difference between the gifted individual being as different from primitive man as an ape is to the primitive man. When I mention the above, sure it sounds condescending - then again I feel like I was just being direct - if you look into positive disintegration almost every average…

It is - I thought this would be a good place to find a great deal of diversity. There won't be any more post from me moving forward regarding any of this^

I was lead to believe that 140 was genius, 130 is significantly gifted, 120+ is highly gifted. And yeah, there wasn't any math on any of the IQ test I've done - but there were numbers in many of the pattern recognition questions. I think they also gauge your age and gender in it as well - women tend to score higher from…

lol that is a bit ironic. tweet 'em about it.

sheesh..wishing I didn't entertain your point to begin with. - seriously made your point about Kierkegaard knowing absolutely nothing about Kierkegaard. Ok - keep PMing me if any of you want to discuss further. Not angry, but certainly can't waste time on this further. Later MFP :flowerforyou: Many of you I love to death!…

Dawkins said in our sexual selection the brain is our peacocks tail! :wink:

:flowerforyou:

-true, space itself like actual dimensional space could be nothing but an illusion. :flowerforyou:

Ha! I use more than one forum! - this book is for those in the collective anchoring stages they all unintentionally partake in. -Dunning–Kruger effect never heard of that so I will look into it. - but I reference quantum mechanics in a hand-waving/spiritual sense making the case for this guy I'm talking to that science can…

then hit the report button babe.

There is not a great deal to debate - we are not capable of even knowing 'truth'. I'm making the case that existentialism is great for battling existential depression/crisis that occur when someone posses a nihilistic ideology - it provides an outlet. I'm a bit of a determinist myself, the randomness of electrons in…

Wait, I didn't mean to imply that you are not 'gifted' - unless you are referring towards having less then three overexcitabilities?

ahh a Hunter fan. +1

That its all 'absurd'.:wink: :laugh:

:noway: I corrected myself and 'then' :wink: opened up the floor to hear out his point? I sincerely do not mean to be coming across as condescending. Once again my discussion has to do largely with the gifted- it was what my initial post stated on this thread - which is why I asked for their participation in particular.