Replies
-
Last night, at 4.48 mph the average heart rate was 123 and the max was 131. The monitor said 436 calories, MFP was 323, Strava was 559, and the website you linked to was 413/345. Seems best just to go with MFP.
-
Why would the intensity level matter to the monitor?
-
No, I don't have too many variables. I used the formula with the chart and got 414 calories and using the calculator linked to at the bottom of the page I get 415 calories. That would be using gross energy. 347 calories using net. MFP tells me 407 calories which I suppose is close enough because I don't eat them back.
-
Ok, senior moment. Using tonight's walk of 2.69 miles at 4.48 mph would be 65*2.69*2.37=414. Correct?
-
Using that would make it 192. This is much lower than all of the walking calculators I've tried online. Are they all really overstating? Each one gives different results but all are in the MFP/Strava range though closer to MFP. Nothing you'd notice really. So using this formula, calories burned is only 154, by far the…
-
They could wear actual pants to the supermarket.
-
Pig Destroyer - Loathsome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_SqtCNhv44
