fangedneko Member

Resorting to snark is even more pathetic.

There are 2 burgers, out of 16 on the Five Guys menu, that break 800 calories, and even those are only because of adding cheese. It's like you revel in being incorrect. And it's quite obvious that you claimed that a single burger was 1500 calories, and equally obvious that it was due to ignorance, not hyperbole. Your…

If that point was that she attempts to hide ignorance behind terms like "hyperbole", then she succeeded brilliantly. This has nothing to do with semantics. If people don't want to be corrected, then they shouldn't post incorrect info on a public forum.

Then maybe you shouldn't use hyperbole. Your original post quite clearly singled out just a single burger, with absolutely no mention of extras. Adding a regular fry more than doubles the calories provided by any one burger on the menu, so that's a pretty ridiculous backpedal you have going there.

No burger on the Five Guys menu even reaches 1000 calories, much less 1500.

Because you're looking to be offended. Stop it.

"Eating fatty foods will make you fat." Anyone talking about somatotypes. They always get it wrong. "Eating healthy costs more than eating fast food." Learn to shop, to budget, and to cook. And just because I didn't see any cat gifs.

Some cats are more demanding.

Why is it OK to spout loaded questions with absolutely no foundation in reality?

With the guidance of the all-powerful Atheismo, anything is possible.

No.

Not nearly enough info for proper feedback.

I hope that you are aware that the Satyricon is a work of fiction.

Holy run-on sentences, Batman!

Yes, you're missing basic reading comprehension.

I think it requires a full on tactical.

Your Dunning-Kruger syndrome is duly noted.

Selective reading, quote mining, ignorance of thermodynamics, and ignoring rebuttals and clarifications doesn't change the fact that you were eating at a caloric excess.

Yes, it did.

So you ask about long term sustainability, then you say that your weight loss goals are short term. You ask for clarification, then you apparently blow off the clarification given with this gem of a response. What exactly are you looking for here?

Is that when you're a bad child and Santa craps down your chimney?

...

You didn't post a single gif (unless you count the emoticon).

Obviously you can eat animal flesh, since you eat fish.

I kid, I kid.

Pretty soon it will be on bottles of water. I have a bottle of lemonade that says this, it's only a matter of time.

I could see it as insulting if one was trying to use imagined persecution as an excuse to ignore the legitimate rebuttals of their indefensible argument.