-
Re: It is more than a simple "CICO" - why can't we just admit it?
^^This, and always this. CI<CO=weight loss; CI>CO=weight gain2 -
Re: MFP doesn't work.
Oh dear, and here I thought it WAS working. I lost 21 pounds and have been doing this for 7 weeks. Am I doing it wrong?3 -
Re: It is more than a simple "CICO" - why can't we just admit it?
As so many others here tried to explain, weight loss is as simple as CICO. The rate of weight loss is a huge variable from person to person, depending on many other factors, but it all comes down to …2 -
Re: It is more than a simple "CICO" - why can't we just admit it?
This is such a clear, logical explanation, that no one should have trouble understanding the reality of CICO. Everyone that loses weight did so because they ate less calories than they were burning.6 -
Re: It is more than a simple "CICO" - why can't we just admit it?
It is really that simple. For weight loss, eat less calories than you burn. How you arrive there may be under a different name, but in the final analysis, it comes down to less CI, than CO. However, …4
