How to handle new MFPers

Options
senecarr
senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
So the point has been brought up that people come in to MFP looking to share the new diet "knoweledge" they've learned from a documentary or book, or blog, and that it really helped them, but... long term MFPers realize the recommendation doesn't agree with their knowledge, scientific consensus, or the dictates of the great Cthulhu.

How should this be handled? Should the OP be politely indulged in this and is it just negativity to disagree? Is it more important to let them fail on their own, or to tell them up front what is wrong?


GOOOOOOOOO!

Replies

  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Options
    One point in the other thread that I found compelling is that it appears that what was being called negative is mere disagreement. So if someone says in a music forum "Taylor Swift's 1989 was the best album of 2014!" the only appropriate response is "yes, you are right, Taylor Swift is super." Saying "no, I don't agree, the best album was St Vincent's" (or whatever -- albums chosen randomly) or even "oh, I don't think Taylor Swift is good at all, because [insert argument here]" would be considered negative, inappropriate, and offensive.

    I think that's really a strange approach to discussion -- an effort to silence any real discussion, in fact, and to limit conversation only to those who already agree with each other, and I do think it's a worthy topic to talk about. Indeed, given that this isn't a music forum and we are talking about facts and science, not just subjective opinions, it's even more important to be able to point out incorrect facts that are presented as true (such as that it's somehow unhealthy to eat any processed food or more than 2 pieces of fruit). Yes, it should be done nicely, but it's quite clear it's the action of presenting disagreeing facts or information and not any actual rudeness that seems to be being challenged.

    Off line (and on line) people disagree with stuff I say all the time--I can't imagine interpreting that as meanness. It's part of what makes discussions interesting.
  • Leyshinka
    Leyshinka Posts: 54 Member
    Options
    "This forum category, General Diet and Weight Loss Help, is for members to ask questions and get help with, and discuss topics related to diet and weight loss. Please be sure to post in the appropriate forum; topics that are off-topic will either be removed or moved to the appropriate topic."


    Based on the above, I think everyone's opinion should be welcome. Adults should be capable to sift through it all and pick what they personally find beneficial.
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Options
    I think, whether the answer to this is two-fold. Firstly, it's never helpful to allow someone to continue to labor under a misconception. Secondly, threads are conversations, conversations are two-way, and opinions are shared. Sometimes they will be negative.

    If someone isn't prepared for someone else to disagree with them? Well, that's on them.

    The manner of the disagreement is where things cross the line from civil discourse to rude mean-people land. The act of disagreement itself is not cause to make such claims.
  • CoffeeNCardio
    CoffeeNCardio Posts: 1,847 Member
    Options
    I try to look at things in the context of real life. If she had walked into a room full of people talking about that, and people disagreed with her publicly, would it have gone down the same way? I think not. People are more sensitive to anything written in text because there's no body language or intonation to tell them it's meant in good spirit. And while people would do well to remember that when they address on another in this format, it's also important for the person who feels offended to try to remember that they are only seeing the words, and the words may not have been so harsh had they come from a man and not a little box on a screen.
  • CoffeeNCardio
    CoffeeNCardio Posts: 1,847 Member
    Options
    I know technically, I'm a "new" MFPer, just thought I'd throw in my two cents. I'm new to MFP, but a veteran of all things internet opinion/forum based. The aforementioned is the same anywhere you go...
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Options
    clgaram720 wrote: »
    I know technically, I'm a "new" MFPer, just thought I'd throw in my two cents. I'm new to MFP, but a veteran of all things internet opinion/forum based. The aforementioned is the same anywhere you go...

    Yeah, I think this is a good point, and part of how I'm forming my opinions too.

    I used to actively post on a book forum and you'd get people thinking it was negative to disagree with them when they posted positively or negatively about a book (more often the former), but there the culture of the site was strongly in favor of free (though respectful) discussion so that someone initially surprised and upset that a post about Dan Brown was met with many comments about how awful his books are (which I understand can feel like a pile-on in a way in person conversations do not, as usually there are fewer participants), would quickly get it that it wasn't personal or an attack, but part of discussing ideas.

    The problem here is that threads get derailed by others jumping in to say it's mean to disagree and the like and then that becomes the discussion and OP digs in with the idea that it was mean to challenge the ideas expressed at all. Or, perhaps, claims that it was just an opinion so in some way should be immune from disagreement.

    IMO, if there was a clearer understanding that rudeness is not okay, but disagreement of course is, and should be encouraged as part of the free discussion of ideas, we'd be better off.

  • CoffeeNCardio
    CoffeeNCardio Posts: 1,847 Member
    Options
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    clgaram720 wrote: »
    I know technically, I'm a "new" MFPer, just thought I'd throw in my two cents. I'm new to MFP, but a veteran of all things internet opinion/forum based. The aforementioned is the same anywhere you go...

    Yeah, I think this is a good point, and part of how I'm forming my opinions too.

    I used to actively post on a book forum and you'd get people thinking it was negative to disagree with them when they posted positively or negatively about a book (more often the former), but there the culture of the site was strongly in favor of free (though respectful) discussion so that someone initially surprised and upset that a post about Dan Brown was met with many comments about how awful his books are (which I understand can feel like a pile-on in a way in person conversations do not, as usually there are fewer participants), would quickly get it that it wasn't personal or an attack, but part of discussing ideas.

    The problem here is that threads get derailed by others jumping in to say it's mean to disagree and the like and then that becomes the discussion and OP digs in with the idea that it was mean to challenge the ideas expressed at all. Or, perhaps, claims that it was just an opinion so in some way should be immune from disagreement.

    IMO, if there was a clearer understanding that rudeness is not okay, but disagreement of course is, and should be encouraged as part of the free discussion of ideas, we'd be better off.

    Dude......babycenter. Talk about a bunch of Drama Llamas. If ever there was a place to learn what not to do it's babycenter. People start sh** on there literally for fun. It's almost as bad as a youtube comments section. Here shouldn't be like that, and frankly, I don't think it is, I think people are just oversensitive/understudied in forum-world.
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    Options
    Popping in here to say this is a great idea, thank you @senecarr
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,642 Member
    edited January 2016
    Options
    problem with MFP is that there is so much traffic, you can't really "police" all this derp. And when you hit it hard and fast, and succinctly and move on, you're looked at as just being an asshole.

    And the inherent problem with food/nutrition is all the confliction in the actual literature. You can make a case using actual sources for all kinds of nonsense.
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    Options
    Wow, I didn't even realize several of the replies in here in October. Even the one that mentioned me by name got buried in my notifications at some point.
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,642 Member
    Options
    also, it's hard to get certain people to let go of fears of "chemicals" that are found in foods at orders of magnitude below NOELS.
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    Options
    Yeah, I think I've seen examples of that on MFP.
  • Therealobi1
    Therealobi1 Posts: 3,261 Member
    Options
    suggestion would be to correct the op and if they fail to listen leave them to their own devices. We have a saying, if you dont hear you will feel.
    the posts sometimes gets messy because people get annoyed that the op will not back down.