First Wrist Tracker - Charge 2

KaeChelleA

I have always used a clip-on Fitbit... the Ultra, the Zip, and then the One. I recently got the Charge 2 because it looked really awesome. I love some of the features and the display. I'm kind of torn though, because there is quite a big step difference between the Charge 2 and the One. I expected some difference with wearing it on my wrist, but I've had about a difference of 2500 steps per day between the two. Today, the One shows 11561 steps while my Charge 2 shows 9356. I have noticed the calorie burn is higher with the Charge 2 though, due to the HR monitor I suppose. As a result, my calorie adjustment is way higher here on MFP with the Charge 2 than it was with the One.

I use apps like Pact and StepBet that reward me based on my # of steps. I guess if I stick with the Charge 2 I will just have to work harder to get the steps.

I don't really have a question here, just my observation. Feel free to chime in though!

T1DCarnivoreRunner

It is probably sensitivity related. You might need to adjust tracker sensitivity. It will probably learn over time too. I used to have a One before switching to a Surge. Though I didn't use them side-by-side, I do know that there are some variations based on where the device is worn (One was usually either clipped on waist or in pocket, Surge on non-dominant wrist). For example, the Surge being on my wrist means that there are sometimes steps counted when I have fast and unusual arm movement. Other times, if I'm holding something heavy enough as I walk to affect arm movement, it doesn't count all steps. There are a lot of variations, though I would say you are seeing a big difference. Maybe let the Charge 2 learn a bit longer and see if it gets closer. Also, adjust sensitivity settings if needed.

KaeChelleA

Thank you for the input. I have just used them side by side this first week to compare. I started using the Charge 2 on Friday. I do like it though and I am getting used to having it on my wrist. Thanks again.