What's On Your Mind Today?
Mrs_Hoffer
Posts: 5,194 Member
This is where you can share what's on your mind. Recipes, ideas, workouts, anything that you think might be helpful to others.
Maybe, you've tried something that has worked for you in the past and would like to share it with the group. Maybe, you have a NSV (Non Scale Victory) that you would like to share with the group. Anything that you feel comfortable sharing or anything that you feel comfortable asking the group for help....this is the place to come.
The GOOD!! What NSV did you have this week!!
The BAD!! So what....you ate the whole thing!!
The UGLY!! That darn scale went through the window this week....it deserved it too!!
So, what's on your mind today??
Maybe, you've tried something that has worked for you in the past and would like to share it with the group. Maybe, you have a NSV (Non Scale Victory) that you would like to share with the group. Anything that you feel comfortable sharing or anything that you feel comfortable asking the group for help....this is the place to come.
The GOOD!! What NSV did you have this week!!
The BAD!! So what....you ate the whole thing!!
The UGLY!! That darn scale went through the window this week....it deserved it too!!
So, what's on your mind today??
0
Replies
-
Before I forget, I want to give a big SHOUT OUT to Deby @DebyS137 for making the banner again this month. I'm just not that talented, so it's a huge help to me Deby! THANKS!!6
-
.
Welcome & Thank You ~Glad to be able to help out for the Group~
.5 -
I need this group joined on March 2021 and have lost 30 lbs but pounds are creeping up. So I need an accountability group like this to get me back on track. Bring on February:):)8
-
lindadoiron50 wrote: »I need this group joined on March 2021 and have lost 30 lbs but pounds are creeping up. So I need an accountability group like this to get me back on track. Bring on February:):)
Welcome @lindadoiron50 !! We're excited to have you! A big high five 👋🏻 on losing 30 lbs so far! And yes, it's much easier to catch that "creeping" NOW rather than weight until later! (Get it? Weight... until later?) Lol.3 -
The MFP folks finally fixed the bookmarking issues! 👏👏👏10
-
Hi! It was so fun joining in at the end of the Jan UAC and I'm excited for the Feb UAC to begin! @jamcnewman suggested I post this question here (thank you for that suggestion:)), so here it is: I'm 15lbs down and plan to recalculate my calorie budget based on this current weight. (I've been using the average of multiple calculators to define my calorie target, not the one MFP calculates.) I plan to start the February UAC at that new (slightly) lower target. Are there any maintainers who could share some advice on how they handled changing/lowering calorie targets as they lost weight? Do most people just follow the MFP calculated target?4
-
@makattack220 I am not sure we can answer this question any better than you can. If your weight loss has not stalled I do not think you should lower your calorie range. When I was losing I just kept the same calorie amount (not adding exercise either up or down just one level) until I hit goal, and then I increased gradually. It sounds like you are doing really well and one thing to be careful of is cutting too deeply and causing a backlash of hunger or lack of energy. Anyway, you have all the data in front of you to make a much better informed decision. Of course my weight loss was 30 pounds and yours could be more or less.4
-
@makattack220
I am not yet in maintenance but thought I would answer your question since I have been doing this for a while. I have had to lower my calories a few times throughout the journey. I don't do anything scientific to lower it, and I don't rely on MFP. I just, if I've been plateauing for a while, lower the calories a bit so that I start losing again. If I am still losing, I don't mess with it.
The other thing about calories I have learned from this group is to think about them weekly. I tend to eat a lot of calories on Friday when we get takeout. And then on the weekends I tend to eat snacks with the kids and and also have higher calories. Then I was not understanding why I wasn't losing weight when I had the right low number of calories on my "good" days. I had to do the weekly math to understand - and I have tried it - that I can eat very low calorie M-Th, high cal on Fri, moderate cal Sat-Sun and still lose. Currently reflecting and maybe deciding that I want to just eat low (but not very low) cal every day instead of that weekly fluctuation - but there is a choice there.5 -
No matter what your personal "mental block" might be (and not restricted to food choices OR activity level OR logging-or-not )
I recommend watching the following TedTalk on Youtube. Tim Urban: Inside the mind of a master procrastinator.
This is the abridged version (less than 4 minutes)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Rk5C149J9C0
InstantGratificationMonkey IGM is up for ANYthing that can defined in the moment as "easy and fun" (and IGM is not entirely food focused ... just a "that's booooooorrrrrring (or toooooo hard!) .... let ME take over driving the body-ship!" kinda personality)
What does YOUR IGM get up to? What are some of your personal IGM-managing or redirecting tricks?2 -
@BMcC9 Thank you! I watched the complete version few times. First it seemed amusing then almost immediately very sad. Just thinking off all things I postponed and never did, and now it is too late. Then reading the comments I came across the following 2 which actually can help me to change things for better
- "You can spend your time being productive or wishing you were productive"
- “Really the worst part of being a procrastinator is the guilt you endure every day.”6 -
@SummerSkier and @Caroline_slowandsteady thank you both! Appreciate the input. I had decided on what seems like a small decrease (about 75 cals), to test it this week, and if I'm feeling hungry at that level then go back to my previous target. I haven't stalled on weight loss but I hadn't changed my calorie target since 15lbs heavier... I guess the point is that I thought I needed to decrease my calories as I lost weight but wasn't sure by how much and how often. What I'm hearing you both say is that "you may or may not need to adjust" - correct? I don't eat back my exercise calories and I usually burn 400-600 cals/day (realizing this is not 100% accurate although I do exercise with a fitness watch with heart rate monitor). I'm eating a calorie target that should be 1-1.5lb loss/week for my stats. I'm confident that I'm maintaining a daily deficit and I am still losing weight, I just wanted to maintain the rate of around 1-1.5lb/week if possible and thought I may need to adjust my calorie target at this point.
@Caroline_slowandsteady I try to eat at or just under my target each day as it took me a long time to detach myself from "diet" mentality for weight loss (eat as little as possible, exercise as much as possible) which, of course, never worked long term. I was the same with "good" days during the week and "fun" days on the weekend. The pendulum swing was just too drastic for me and unsustainable. This time around I've taken things slow, eliminated target dates for certain weight goals, am eating to target daily, and focusing more on the mindset work, getting adequate sleep and hydration, meditating, etc (general health and wellness instead of such a heavy focus on the number on the scale).
@BMcC9 THIS. TALK. I watched and bookmarked the long version to watch during my workout later. Thank you for sharing this!🙏☺️3 -
December was a good month for me - lost 9 1/2 pounds
January though I tracked all food, walked daily and drank all my water did not make any positive changes re my weight - think I even went up a bit so that tells me I overate on healthy food
February so glad it is here - was on track yesterday and am once again on track today - watching to make sure I have proper portions this month
Have to stop this one good month one not so good month - I am going to make February a great month for my health and think of March when it comes
Hope you all have a great day / week
7 -
I watched these two videos of Dr. Chris Knobbe this morning (they are both very similar, the first one has a little more emphasis on obesity and the second a little more emphasis on Macular Degeneration) and wondered if this idea that the consumption seed oils are playing a critical role, perhaps even more than sugar, in our modern degenerative diseases is something others here have been concerned about or what you think-- in terms of how you prioritize what you are concerned about in healthy eating.
I had seen Dr. Tony Hampton and others suggest that we stick to using basically four fats in our cooking (BOCA butter, olive oil, coconut oil, and avocado oil) and avoid any seed oil that has only been available in modern times, but I had never heard such statistics of how the use of seed oils correlate with the growth of modern degenerative diseases.
(@mshawski When he talked of starting to investigate this after going paleo caused such an improvement in his arthritis, I thought of you)
This was the first time that I had heard that seed oils could be a cause of insulin resistance, even more than sugar--- although the takeaway is the same as so much of what I am reading--- our modern degenerative diseases are caused by processed food.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kGnfXXIKZM&ab_channel=LowCarbDownUnder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxCL2Tc9bu0&ab_channel=Dr.EricBergDC5 -
koeitjiesa wrote: »Hi guys. I have a question. I was within my calories, but only with my exta exercise calories included. Does this still count as within my calories? I hope this makes sense...
@koeitjiesa
Quote from the FAQ pin at the top of the group main board (where Introductions and What's On Your Mind Today are also pinned)
11. If I exercise a lot, can I 'eat back' my exercise calories?
Your calorie goal and calorie adjustments are entirely up to you.
(A common early-days question ... Veterans, please expand on what follows, and add your collective wisdom)
Yes your exercise calories can be eaten back, if that is how you define your personal calorie envelope. It varies from person to person for many reasons.
How many you eat back and on a regular basis (or not) is also personal. Some people who have heavy energy exercise daily patterns are (hopefully) eating back enough to support what they are doing (either by eating some/all back or by allowing for it via their "daily activity level" being set at an active or very active setting, so that MFP assigns them more to eat in the first place)
With experience comes the knowledge whether where they take the "calories burned number" from is inflated or not and they may choose "50% of logged exercise credits is my personal upper calorie daily limit" or something like that.
Others with smaller routine burns might choose to mostly ignore, but consider some (or all) an available infrequently-used drawn-on-the-day buffer. Like making a point to do an extra walk on a Family Gathering Day, knowing that there is going to be more-than-usual calories in a special supper.
I am adding this to the What's On Your Mind Today so that others with this question are less likely to miss it, and other veterans can expand on the above.1 -
On the topic of "setting your Daily Activity level to meet your ACTUAL needs. everybody ....
you may have a very sedentary desk job but are cheating yourself of you calorie needs if your daily routine is always in the 10,000+ step range. Check the chart below, and then verify that your MFP daily lifestyle setting matches.
The OR is very important, and often overlooked in the initial profile set-ups
5 -
Thanks BeeJ for such a detailed explanation!! Personally, I don't eat back my exercise calories. In fact, I have it turned off in MFP, so that MFP doesn't even add them back into my food diary. (Although, I must admit, I exercise much more in the warmer weather when I can get outside!) Lol.2
-
On the topic of "setting your Daily Activity level to meet your ACTUAL needs. everybody ....
you may have a very sedentary desk job but are cheating yourself of you calorie needs if your daily routine is always in the 10,000+ step range. Check the chart below, and then verify that your MFP daily lifestyle setting matches.
The OR is very important, and often overlooked in the initial profile set-ups
@BMcC9 - Thank you for the chart. I have to admit, I'm still a little confused since I read somewhere on MFP that you're not supposed to include your deliberate exercise calories in the daily activity level. That being said, when I went in recently to reset my goals, the guided MFP still has me at 1200 calories per day. I selected "sedentary" since other than deliberate exercise, I kind of am. I changed my goal from losing 1.5 pounds/week to 1 pound per week and said that I do 60 minutes of exercise/day. I'm 5 foot 7 inches and around 145 pounds and have 10 more pounds to lose until goal weight. At 1200 cal/day, it says that I will lose .7 pounds/week. I almost never eat below 1200 and usually eat anywhere between 25% - 50% of my exercise calories back.
Have I been doing this wrong? I am truly interested in understanding this better so that I don't set myself up for failure longer term.2 -
Hello Just checking in, I am trying to navigate as this is my first time joining an online challenge. I introduced myself end of Jan, have been tracking on MFP which is a task because I have not been that consistent with journaling before. This is the year, I have tracked 7 days in a row which is an accomplishment. But then I was wondering how that connects with the challenge. I just reread instruction....shhhh ( I am at work) haha. and one rule was to check in with group Oh boy, I didn't read that very well. I read it as in completing your daily tracking Well, it got me to track and I believe I can continue the rest of the month. Enjoy reading everyone's journey. Have a fantastic day!6
-
@four__db
I think of it as basically four things to do, which become a habit. 1. Track. 2. Try to stay below your calorie goal. 3. 20 minutes of exercise activity. and 4-- at the end of the day or the next day, post on the thread for that day. That´s it. The tracking helps you become more conscious of what you are eating, making conscious eating choices, and helps you know if you are doing what is necessary to lose weight.
I wrote this here because it is not clear to me if you understood that there is a thread for each day of the month where you ¨check in¨ daily and report how you did on the first three things.
2 -
enlightenme3 wrote: »On the topic of "setting your Daily Activity level to meet your ACTUAL needs. everybody ....
you may have a very sedentary desk job but are cheating yourself of you calorie needs if your daily routine is always in the 10,000+ step range. Check the chart below, and then verify that your MFP daily lifestyle setting matches.
The OR is very important, and often overlooked in the initial profile set-ups
@BMcC9 - Thank you for the chart. I have to admit, I'm still a little confused since I read somewhere on MFP that you're not supposed to include your deliberate exercise calories in the daily activity level. That being said, when I went in recently to reset my goals, the guided MFP still has me at 1200 calories per day. I selected "sedentary" since other than deliberate exercise, I kind of am. I changed my goal from losing 1.5 pounds/week to 1 pound per week and said that I do 60 minutes of exercise/day. I'm 5 foot 7 inches and around 145 pounds and have 10 more pounds to lose until goal weight. At 1200 cal/day, it says that I will lose .7 pounds/week. I almost never eat below 1200 and usually eat anywhere between 25% - 50% of my exercise calories back.
Have I been doing this wrong? I am truly interested in understanding this better so that I don't set myself up for failure longer term.
Hi @BMcC9 @koeitjiesa and @enlightenme3 - I really appreciated your posts. I hesitated to respond as I am so new to all of this and don’t have a nickel’s worth of experience compared to so many on here. But I do see a dietician once a month and she really helps me figure some of this out.
Your chart is interesting BeeJ, but it doesn’t line up with the activity levels in MFP (i.e., sedentary, lightly active, and the next option is active). There is no moderately active. option. Perhaps those who pay for MFP have a greater granularity in choice?
I am on the “free” version of the MFP app and so have set myself to lightly active. The calorie limit that MFP gives me just under the calorie limit that my dietician set, so I adjusted it to the levels she gave for calories (1400 - and that is always based on height, weight, age), and macros (30% fat; 25% protein; and 45% carbs). I do complete 10,000+ steps a day, but my “activity” level of my output is by no means greater than lightly active. My dietician’s advice was to set it to lightly active and leave the exercise calories in the bank. If I set to sedentary, I could possibly eat more of them back, but as I was being consistent in my activity and it was lightly active, keep it there. End of day, I set out to exercise every day for 30+ active minutes (in actuality, it has recently been 40-75 minutes a day) and do 10,000+ steps a day. I am truly “lightly active” and no more than that.
I am currently using the Canadian ParticipACTION App (free) to help me understand my activity level better and how to gain maximum health benefit from the time I put in.
Our daughter and I are preparing to do the “True North” challenge together Feb 7-21 and one thing we talked about last night was this interesting tidbit from their FAQ:
”Why am I not getting credit for all of my steps / how do I accumulate minutes of moderate to vigorous-intensity activity?
You didn’t think we were just going to give away steps, did you? You have to earn them! To get credit for ‘active minutes’ (i.e., moderate to vigorous physical activity), you must be moving at a fairly brisk pace. Meaning, you must hit 100 steps or more per minute to equal one ‘active’ minute which counts towards your weekly goal….adults require 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week. It is much more than a step counter! ”
So, It isn’t the number of steps that causes development or maintenance of health, it is the intensity of the activity. Some must be “active” in order for there to be any high health benefit. I am learning a lot. It is helping me make better decisions about how to improve my health as I had thought I was doing pretty well just getting in that number of “steps”. And I was, but it is time, for me, to do better.
As for eating back exercise calories, personally, I do my best to leave them in the bank if I am not hungry. Key advice from my dietician — do not suffer hunger as it isn’t the goal and is not sustainable. I do build up my “exercise calorie bank” on the days when I know I will want to partake in some of the celebrations that involve food or wine. These are infrequent but this approach helps me with feeling like I am not deprived.3 -
I don't use MFP or it's activity levels to set my calorie goals because my body does not run on MFP software (thank God, otherwise things would be so much worse lol)
Everyone has their own way of doing things, thereby their own preferences. For me personally, the only number that matters is the number of calories I must eat per day to stay at my current weight. From there I can eat at a lower number to have a predictable weight loss. Granted, this is how MFP is SUPPOSED to work, but it doesn't. When I go out and calculate my TDEE it does not always match up to MFP.
Based on that method I use, of knowing my TDEE and reducing that number of calories to a target weight reduction, I know I need that many calories if all I do is nothing. If I do something, well, I better eat those calories back or else I am in a bigger deficit.
There are other approaches that people use which are successful for them. Find what works for you. But the most important thing you can do is know all of the WHAT and WHY of your numbers. Don't just assume MFP is telling you the right numbers. It can be wrong. It has been wrong for me on a few occasions putting me into too large of a calorie deficit making me hungry. Some people live on an eternal plateau while at a setting that they should supposedly be losing weight based off of MFP. Most people who struggle simply run these calculations on their own and find a different number than what MFP was guiding them towards based on their settings.
If MFP and the MFP numbers are working for you and you're happy with that, keep going with it! Just remember that if things get too confusing later and you can't figure out why nothing is working the way MFP says it should be working, you need to double check that number MFP is spitting out based on your variety of settings, and adjustments made from fitness devices, etc.5 -
Here’s my 2 cents if I am stuck on weight loss I increase or decrease my calorie count I had read somewhere this was a good way to kick start the process again so far it has worked for me I am also trying to not eat so much protein as I think this slowed down my loss. Currently I eat about 1250 calories a day and try not to touch the exercise calories.4
-
enlightenme3 wrote: »On the topic of "setting your Daily Activity level to meet your ACTUAL needs. everybody ....
you may have a very sedentary desk job but are cheating yourself of you calorie needs if your daily routine is always in the 10,000+ step range. Check the chart below, and then verify that your MFP daily lifestyle setting matches.
The OR is very important, and often overlooked in the initial profile set-ups
@BMcC9 - Thank you for the chart. I have to admit, I'm still a little confused since I read somewhere on MFP that you're not supposed to include your deliberate exercise calories in the daily activity level. That being said, when I went in recently to reset my goals, the guided MFP still has me at 1200 calories per day. I selected "sedentary" since other than deliberate exercise, I kind of am. I changed my goal from losing 1.5 pounds/week to 1 pound per week and said that I do 60 minutes of exercise/day. I'm 5 foot 7 inches and around 145 pounds and have 10 more pounds to lose until goal weight. At 1200 cal/day, it says that I will lose .7 pounds/week. I almost never eat below 1200 and usually eat anywhere between 25% - 50% of my exercise calories back.
Have I been doing this wrong? I am truly interested in understanding this better so that I don't set myself up for failure longer term.
For someone as close to goal weight as you say you are .... it might be time to start preparing yourself for the idea that "maintenance requires more calories". SO in YOUR case, do consider finding out what MFP says someone your age and height at your desired GW and MAINTAINING aught to eat, (before exercise) then split the difference and see if you keep going down. I haven't quite successfully made the transition to on-going maintenance, but there are others here who have and can best advise.
The main point of the chart is .... fine-tuning exact calorie intake through trial and error ... the target is to "eat sufficient (health-supporting) calories to fuel what you routinely do in a day" rather than "routinely exercise more just so that I can routinely eat more"
If you set your MFP Profile as "sedentary" AND have an aggressive "lose per week" number, MFP won't know that you should actually be eating more to support what your day is REALLY like, and will auto-set you to the minimum it is willing to allow for women (1200) sooner than it should for optimal health.
I am NOT the best coach-source for explaining this, but .. based on personal experience ... after I got a fitbit AND made a personal goal of having more daily steps as a rule instead of spending most of my off-hours reading and otherwise not moving much apart from 20 mins on an exercise bike ... which I mostly wouldn't eat back ...Say "sedentary" might describe "Mildrid's" nine-to-five desk job .... but she is not a couch-potato after hours. Maybe her fitbit says that she habitually moves around (doing chores, making a point of parking away from the mall entrance, being purposefully"inefficient" so as to take more trips bringing in groceries or putting laundry away) to the point where she mostly does 5000 steps in a "slow" day without really noticing .... AND the time on her exercise rowing machine, or strength-training or Youtube Zumba Class is her "20 + minutes of intentional exercise" which she logs but does not eat back.
But in reality, BEFORE intentional exercise, Mildrid is living a "lightly active" lifestyle - while her twin "Moppsy" is the exact same height and weight / does the same job / does the exact same "20+ minutes of intentional exercise" which she logs but does not eat back ... BUT spends all her after-work hours reading and maybe does 2500 steps on a particularly "hectic" day. Moppsy truly DOES have a sedentary lifestyle.
4 -
enlightenme3 wrote: »On the topic of "setting your Daily Activity level to meet your ACTUAL needs. everybody ....
you may have a very sedentary desk job but are cheating yourself of you calorie needs if your daily routine is always in the 10,000+ step range. Check the chart below, and then verify that your MFP daily lifestyle setting matches.
The OR is very important, and often overlooked in the initial profile set-ups
@BMcC9 - Thank you for the chart. I have to admit, I'm still a little confused since I read somewhere on MFP that you're not supposed to include your deliberate exercise calories in the daily activity level. That being said, when I went in recently to reset my goals, the guided MFP still has me at 1200 calories per day. I selected "sedentary" since other than deliberate exercise, I kind of am. I changed my goal from losing 1.5 pounds/week to 1 pound per week and said that I do 60 minutes of exercise/day. I'm 5 foot 7 inches and around 145 pounds and have 10 more pounds to lose until goal weight. At 1200 cal/day, it says that I will lose .7 pounds/week. I almost never eat below 1200 and usually eat anywhere between 25% - 50% of my exercise calories back.
Have I been doing this wrong? I am truly interested in understanding this better so that I don't set myself up for failure longer term.
For someone as close to goal weight as you say you are .... it might be time to start preparing yourself for the idea that "maintenance requires more calories". SO in YOUR case, do consider finding out what MFP says someone your age and height at your desired GW and MAINTAINING aught to eat, (before exercise) then split the difference and see if you keep going down. I haven't quite successfully made the transition to on-going maintenance, but there are others here who have and can best advise.
Ah, makes sense. I went through the guided goals section again. When I set weight loss goal to .5 pounds/week, I get a calorie total of 1330. If I set it to maintain, I get 1540. I'm assuming this is net calories. If so, I realize I'm probably not eating enough if I look back at my diary.
I swear this whole thing is like tetris - trying to get the right amount of calories, exercise and then worry about all the different macros!
3 -
Yes the numbers would be "net calories" guesstimate on MFP's part. Try the 1330 for several weeks and see what happens / how you feel. When within 5 pounds, maybe split the difference again (to ~ 1440 pre exercise)
You may have to twigg juuuuuust a bit up or down as you close in on your final-final "eat about this much on average to stay within a 3-to-5 pound maintenance target range" But it is easier both logging wise and mentally when you are only adjusting default serving sizes and choices by maybe 50 -100 cals per day instead of suddenly 500 cals more per day.
You want to end up with a default eating size&content style that you can see yourself continuing indefinitely. Now is the time to practice eating very close to that "as if" menu if you aren't already.
2 -
Mrs_Hoffer wrote: »Before I forget, I want to give a big SHOUT OUT to Deby @DebyS137 for making the banner again this month. I'm just not that talented, so it's a huge help to me Deby! THANKS!!
Yep thanks @DebyS137 xo1 -
lindadoiron50 wrote: »I need this group joined on March 2021 and have lost 30 lbs but pounds are creeping up. So I need an accountability group like this to get me back on track. Bring on February:):)
Welcome @lindadoiron50 and good luck with it!!! Over time this group changed my life so I hope it does the same 4 u! Xo3 -
No matter what your personal "mental block" might be (and not restricted to food choices OR activity level OR logging-or-not )
I recommend watching the following TedTalk on Youtube. Tim Urban: Inside the mind of a master procrastinator.
This is the abridged version (less than 4 minutes)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Rk5C149J9C0
InstantGratificationMonkey IGM is up for ANYthing that can defined in the moment as "easy and fun" (and IGM is not entirely food focused ... just a "that's booooooorrrrrring (or toooooo hard!) .... let ME take over driving the body-ship!" kinda personality)
What does YOUR IGM get up to? What are some of your personal IGM-managing or redirecting tricks?
Thanks I'll check it out right now. Xox0 -
makattack220 wrote: »@SummerSkier and @Caroline_slowandsteady thank you both! Appreciate the input. I had decided on what seems like a small decrease (about 75 cals), to test it this week, and if I'm feeling hungry at that level then go back to my previous target. I haven't stalled on weight loss but I hadn't changed my calorie target since 15lbs heavier... I guess the point is that I thought I needed to decrease my calories as I lost weight but wasn't sure by how much and how often. What I'm hearing you both say is that "you may or may not need to adjust" - correct? I don't eat back my exercise calories and I usually burn 400-600 cals/day (realizing this is not 100% accurate although I do exercise with a fitness watch with heart rate monitor). I'm eating a calorie target that should be 1-1.5lb loss/week for my stats. I'm confident that I'm maintaining a daily deficit and I am still losing weight, I just wanted to maintain the rate of around 1-1.5lb/week if possible and thought I may need to adjust my calorie target at this point.
@Caroline_slowandsteady I try to eat at or just under my target each day as it took me a long time to detach myself from "diet" mentality for weight loss (eat as little as possible, exercise as much as possible) which, of course, never worked long term. I was the same with "good" days during the week and "fun" days on the weekend. The pendulum swing was just too drastic for me and unsustainable. This time around I've taken things slow, eliminated target dates for certain weight goals, am eating to target daily, and focusing more on the mindset work, getting adequate sleep and hydration, meditating, etc (general health and wellness instead of such a heavy focus on the number on the scale).
@BMcC9 THIS. TALK. I watched and bookmarked the long version to watch during my workout later. Thank you for sharing this!🙏☺️
Sounds like u got urself a great plan! Trust me slow and steady is def the way to go. I hve learnt this the hard way.xo1 -
Marilynsretired wrote: »December was a good month for me - lost 9 1/2 pounds
January though I tracked all food, walked daily and drank all my water did not make any positive changes re my weight - think I even went up a bit so that tells me I overate on healthy food
February so glad it is here - was on track yesterday and am once again on track today - watching to make sure I have proper portions this month
Have to stop this one good month one not so good month - I am going to make February a great month for my health and think of March when it comes
Hope you all have a great day / week
Great insight and reflection. U got this. Xo0