interesting article on Low carbs..
Chicagolopez
Posts: 39 Member
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/17/carbs-cognitive-impairment_n_1970905.html
Cut and Paste into your browser
Name of article in the Huffington Post::
Carbs, Sugar Linked With Cognitive Impairment Risk In Elderly:
Cut and Paste into your browser
Name of article in the Huffington Post::
Carbs, Sugar Linked With Cognitive Impairment Risk In Elderly:
0
Replies
-
Thanks, it doesn't surprise me in the slightest, we just have not evolved to handle the carb loads that we routinely consume daily.
Given that we are also generally dietary-fat-phobic this pushes us away from consuming what our bodies (and, particularly in this case, brain) needs and back to the food pyramid and the array of illnesses that that kind of eating pattern promotes.
I find it amusing that 'low (adequate) carbing' is sometimes seen as having some unknown long-term health issues when we know what the issues with following Conventional Wisdom (low fat, watch the cholesterol, eat your grains, etc) are.
Check out the links between Alzheimers ("Type 3 diabetes") and excessive carb consumption ...
But hey, "I can eat Pop Tarts and lose weight" Yeh, bully for you.0 -
Hey- will we low carbers have anyone useful to talk to in our nursing homes?
We'd better come up with a plan so we can play scrabble with some similar opponents.
"Lifetime low carbers who haven't lost their marbles retirement estate"0 -
Hey- will we low carbers have anyone useful to talk to in our nursing homes?
We'd better come up with a plan so we can play scrabble with some similar opponents.
"Lifetime low carbers who haven't lost their marbles retirement estate"
My lack of carbohydrate will be offset by alcohol ... I think I'll end up about even so I'll be the one drooling in the corner.
A bit like Father Jack in Father Ted0 -
lol- oh dear....better prep your kids NOW!
I'll be like Sylvester Stalone's mum- Never give up, age disgracefully!0 -
"But hey, "I can eat Pop Tarts and lose weight" Yeh, bully for you."
Agreed. I think too many people are focused on just their weight, or body composition. Although we know it is more than calories in/calories out of course you'll still lose weight eating carbs if you restrict calories enough. I'd probably lose weight off a diet of paper and sawdust too, doesn't make it healthy though!0 -
"But hey, "I can eat Pop Tarts and lose weight" Yeh, bully for you."
Agreed. I think too many people are focused on just their weight, or body composition. Although we know it is more than calories in/calories out of course you'll still lose weight eating carbs if you restrict calories enough. I'd probably lose weight off a diet of paper and sawdust too, doesn't make it healthy though!
Absolutely, it can't be a bad strategy to try to avoid potential toxins and focus on natural, nutrient-dense food first and let everything follow from there, including a relatively lean body.
There is no magjc to low carb from a fat loss perspective, we still have to make day to day decisions to limit our intake or maximise our fat-burning BUT we can do this without being on a blood-sugar rollercoaster AND minimise the health impacts of high blood sugar/insulin to boot.
We did not, collectively, get into this obesity/diabetes mess eating too much fat, this is abundantly clear ...0 -
Thanks for the link. I'm sending that to my 73 y/o mum who is worried about her memory. And since I don't have kids to take care of me when I'm older I'll need all my marbles! What? alcohol effects the brain? lol ya, that may cause some trouble....0
-
Hey- will we low carbers have anyone useful to talk to in our nursing homes?
We'd better come up with a plan so we can play scrabble with some similar opponents.
"Lifetime low carbers who haven't lost their marbles retirement estate"
Unfortunately I'm afraid of what they will feed us in the nursing home!! :noway: We better start stockpiling hoards of bacon now!0 -
Hey- will we low carbers have anyone useful to talk to in our nursing homes?
We'd better come up with a plan so we can play scrabble with some similar opponents.
"Lifetime low carbers who haven't lost their marbles retirement estate"
Unfortunately I'm afraid of what they will feed us in the nursing home!! :noway: We better start stockpiling hoards of bacon now!
Yah you are right we should be afraid very afraid of what they will feed us. I with you on the bacon LOL0 -
An interesting sidelight to this and another item in the news ...Senator George McGovern, who died a few days ago. He was a classic big-government liberal, recognized almost universally as a politician who sincerely and deeply cared about what he saw as the poor quality of the American diet circa 1977.
As detailed in Gary Taubes' "Why We Get Fat," Sen. McGovern convened a Senate panel that year to examine and try to fix the poor diet of the time. That's the kind of thing a good government can do -- fix things (like personal tastes, habits, incorrect "common sense" etc. Like outlawing Big Gulps in NYC -- but that's another story.)
As Taubes points out, at the time common sense said that carbs -- especially bread, pasta and potatoes -- make you fat. I remember my aunt in 1962 losing five pounds... how? By taking the bread basket off the dinner table for a couple months. But boy was she ever wrong! It was obvious to Sen. McGovern (despite contrary testimony) that it wasn't carbs that were the problem -- it was fat! What could be clearer? Fat make you fat. This was the weighty conclusion of the McGovern panel.
So government money funded academics who were tasked with fleshing out the Senate findings, and soon after, the first Food Pyramid was printed. School lunch menus were altered, farm bills written to support grain producers, pamphlets designed, articles planted in print media to support the new correct thinking. It was largely successful. The American diet improved over time, gradually reducing saturated fat and increasing carbohydrate consumption --you can see it in graphs.
Funny thing, though, after about a ten-year lag time, graphs show obesity and diabetes 2 beginning parallel rises, too. (Same thing in a few other countries that eventually adopted a similar viewpoint, like Canada & Australia -- but not in countries that kept to their old ways, like Japan and France.)
This is only to say that while I admire McGovern for his devotion to public service, (he was an amazingly brave bomber pilot in WWII too-- I read his biography), it is obvious that even the most well-intentioned Senate panel is capable of causing vast unintended harmful consequences -- in a word, havoc. Ultimately we have to be responsible for our own decisions and not hand our judgment off to some kindly agency out there...
All one has to do is visit the local mall and mingle among shoppers to see the consequences in action -- a sight Sen. McGovern and his fellow senators could not have imagined in 1977.0 -
Yup, XCcyclist, quite so ... this is what happens when politics and vested commercial interests get involved with nutrition.
I believe that the McGovern commission was told by many scientists that dietary fat was not the problem but McGovern said words to the effect that "We couldn't wait for the studies to come in".
We, here we are living with the consequences of basing our diets on Bad Science and hunches.
Yes, some of it is personal responsibility but trying to just maintain a decent weight on a grain-based diet is torture for a lot of people.
Look at the obsession with gyms and "working out" ... We don't need to do this to be lean. We just don't.
And trying to lose weight when piling up the carbs ... well, no wonder so many people fail.0 -
Thanks DeadVim
"Yes, some of it is personal responsibility but trying to just maintain a decent weight on a grain-based diet is torture for a lot of people."
You are right-- because the advancing nutritional information is suppressed. Not by a censor per say, but by the difficulty of getting government grants to fund contrary studies. But perhaps more importantly:
I don't remember which book it was but the author observed that even if the doctor personally follows low-carb and believes in it completely, he or she is much safer in advising patients to follow the official high-carb Food Pyramid because if a heart attack (or meteor strike!) occurs he or she will not be sued having advised the conventional approach.0 -
Add in the fact that some doctors are 'rewarded' by the system for prescribing drugs to reduce symptoms (which may or may not be relevant to good health ... i.e. cholesterol numbers) and not treat the underlying issues (which takes more time) and we have a health care system that is driven more by commercial interests than anything else.
We have to be our own health care professionals these days, I am lowish carb right now but I am open to any suggestion it might not be optimal for me going forward.
I don't see the food pyramid being the answer though0