We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

body fat percentage

jmzz1
jmzz1 Posts: 670 Member
edited February 11 in Social Groups
hi, would like to know which online calculator is better to measure body fat percentage not using callipers?

Replies

  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    Honestly I don't think any of them are going to likely be very accurate.

    This one just so happened to be reasonably accurate for me, but I wouldn't put too much faith in it:

    http://www.calculator.net/army-body-fat-calculator.html
  • prattiger65
    prattiger65 Posts: 1,657 Member
    Honestly I don't think any of them are going to likely be very accurate.

    This one just so happened to be reasonably accurate for me, but I wouldn't put too much faith in it:

    http://www.calculator.net/army-body-fat-calculator.html

    Seconded, I use the military calculator on fat2fitradio.com. It seems to track a fairly close to what I get with calipers, but I think it's just luck.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Honestly I don't think any of them are going to likely be very accurate.

    This one just so happened to be reasonably accurate for me, but I wouldn't put too much faith in it:

    http://www.calculator.net/army-body-fat-calculator.html

    That puts me at 25% at my leanest. Which is 7.5% higher than my hydrostatic test at the time and 6% more than your eyeball estimate. Mah azz must put it off.
  • michellekicks
    michellekicks Posts: 3,624 Member
    This one overshoots fat for me too... it puts me at 31% but my recent DEXA has me right about 27%.
  • AllonsYtotheTardis
    AllonsYtotheTardis Posts: 16,947 Member
    that one puts me at about 30%. Which I'm quite sure I'm not.
  • GiGiBeans
    GiGiBeans Posts: 1,062 Member
    The army one puts me at 23%, calipers 23.2%, my BF scale 24% - 27% regular mode (athletic mode gives me 15 -17%, uh no, LOL) . I go by the calipers since it's more consistent than my scale but if I ever have a DEXA done I'm sure it would show higher.
  • jmzz1
    jmzz1 Posts: 670 Member
    thanks for the reply

    http://www.calculator.net/army-body-fat-calculator.html
    i tried this calculator and my bf% shows me at 30%

    and i tried fat2fit calculator and my bf% is 27.8%

    which one should i believe?

    my stats

    age - 27
    height - 65inch
    weight - 167lbs
    waist (at navel) - 37 inch
    wrist - 5 inch
    forearm - 9 inch
    hip - 41inch
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member


    which one should i believe?



    Neither.

    Can you clarify what you are using this measurement for?
  • sun_fish
    sun_fish Posts: 864 Member
    I have a tag on question - keeping in mind that online calculators can be inaccurate, would you say that at least if you pick one to use on a consistent basis, that you will see an accurate trend? So if I come up with 30%, then a few months later it's 28%, even if those 2 numbers are quite possibly incorrect, can I still assume that I have gone down 2%?
  • MyIdaho54
    MyIdaho54 Posts: 81 Member
    For me, the Omron handheld BIA and army calculator are similar at 35% BF. The fat2fit calculator has me at 32.9%. Pretty close agreement and no, the tech at the gym would die laughing if I asked for a caliper measurement.... :laugh:

    Karindiane, many of us do use the calculators/BIA devices for a general estimate of body composition change, recognizing that they're not totally accurate in their prediction. From what I've read, accuracy does vary with gender and degree of obesity. Good luck and congrats on your results!
  • MyIdaho54
    MyIdaho54 Posts: 81 Member
    See the link below for a woman's results over 100 days. She clearly was successful in her weight loss with decreases in body measurements, decrease % fat with calipers, and decrease % fat with BIA measurement. The loss is also very apparent in her pictures. Interesting that she smiles wearing blue but not red... :smile: Individual results will vary of course...

    http://paleozonenutrition.com/2011/08/31/3-methods-of-measuring-body-fat-compared-over-100-days/
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    I have a tag on question - keeping in mind that online calculators can be inaccurate, would you say that at least if you pick one to use on a consistent basis, that you will see an accurate trend? So if I come up with 30%, then a few months later it's 28%, even if those 2 numbers are quite possibly incorrect, can I still assume that I have gone down 2%?

    Not necessarily.

    I would say though, that if you are losing weight and doing other things correctly via training and nutrition that you can make the assumption that you are reducing total fat and body fat % in some capacity.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    See the link below for a woman's results over 100 days. She clearly was successful in her weight loss with decreases in body measurements, decrease % fat with calipers, and decrease % fat with BIA measurement. The loss is also very apparent in her pictures. Interesting that she smiles wearing blue but not red... :smile: Individual results will vary of course...

    http://paleozonenutrition.com/2011/08/31/3-methods-of-measuring-body-fat-compared-over-100-days/

    Caloric deficits will tend do that. =)
  • Serah87
    Serah87 Posts: 5,481 Member
    The army calculator gives me BF 21%.

    I had a free test done at my gym called the Tanita Body Composition Analyzer, it gave me BF 23%.

    My scale at home gives me BF 23.6%.

    BF % photos of females on the internet, show that I believe that I'm around 21 to 22% BF.
  • jmzz1
    jmzz1 Posts: 670 Member


    which one should i believe?



    Neither.

    Can you clarify what you are using this measurement for?
    My scale number is not reducing. So thought of measuring bf %
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member


    which one should i believe?



    Neither.

    Can you clarify what you are using this measurement for?
    My scale number is not reducing. So thought of measuring bf %

    Are your measurements decreasing?
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member


    which one should i believe?



    Neither.

    Can you clarify what you are using this measurement for?
    My scale number is not reducing. So thought of measuring bf %

    Are your measurements decreasing?

    ^ That's going to be more indicative of potential progress than bodyfat analysis, especially with an online method.

    How long has your weight been stalled?
  • jmzz1
    jmzz1 Posts: 670 Member


    which one should i believe?

    My weight has been stalled from past 6 months

    Neither.

    Can you clarify what you are using this measurement for?
    My scale number is not reducing. So thought of measuring bf %

    Are your measurements decreasing?

    ^ That's going to be more indicative of potential progress than bodyfat analysis, especially with an online method.

    How long has your weight been stalled?
  • jmzz1
    jmzz1 Posts: 670 Member

    ^ That's going to be more indicative of potential progress than bodyfat analysis, especially with an online method.

    How long has your weight been stalled?
    my weight has stalled for past 6 months
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member

    ^ That's going to be more indicative of potential progress than bodyfat analysis, especially with an online method.

    How long has your weight been stalled?
    my weight has stalled for past 6 months

    What about your measurements?
  • jmzz1
    jmzz1 Posts: 670 Member

    ^ That's going to be more indicative of potential progress than bodyfat analysis, especially with an online method.

    How long has your weight been stalled?
    my weight has stalled for past 6 months

    What about your measurements?
    There is no change in my measurements too
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member

    ^ That's going to be more indicative of potential progress than bodyfat analysis, especially with an online method.

    How long has your weight been stalled?
    my weight has stalled for past 6 months

    What about your measurements?
    There is no change in my measurements too

    If there is no change in the scale and no change in your measurements, then you are maintaining and your BF% will be staying the same.

    The online calculators are generally inaccurate for many. They are just based on scale weight, height and measurements. If your measurements are going down, you are body fat. Make sure you do not have too large of a deficit, do some resistance training and get enough protein and you will be doing everything you can do to ensure that any losses are from fat (as opposed to muscle).

    The online calculators are a tool to track progress, but so is the scale combined with measurements (as that is all the online calculators do).
  • jmzz1
    jmzz1 Posts: 670 Member
    If there is no change in the scale and no change in your measurements, then you are maintaining and your BF% will be staying the same.

    The online calculators are generally inaccurate for many. They are just based on scale weight, height and measurements. If your measurements are going down, you are body fat. Make sure you do not have too large of a deficit, do some resistance training and get enough protein and you will be doing everything you can do to ensure that any losses are from fat (as opposed to muscle).

    The online calculators are a tool to track progress, but so is the scale combined with measurements (as that is all the online calculators do).

    my calories intake is 1600 with carbs =150gm, protein=100gms, fat=60gms
    how am i supposed to change these macros (increaase or decrease them)?

    my weight is 167lbs and height 165cms
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    If there is no change in the scale and no change in your measurements, then you are maintaining and your BF% will be staying the same.

    The online calculators are generally inaccurate for many. They are just based on scale weight, height and measurements. If your measurements are going down, you are body fat. Make sure you do not have too large of a deficit, do some resistance training and get enough protein and you will be doing everything you can do to ensure that any losses are from fat (as opposed to muscle).

    The online calculators are a tool to track progress, but so is the scale combined with measurements (as that is all the online calculators do).

    my calories intake is 1600 with carbs =150gm, protein=100gms, fat=60gms
    how am i supposed to change these macros (increaase or decrease them)?

    my weight is 167lbs and height 165cms

    Can you open your diary please.
This discussion has been closed.