Your exercise goals on MFP have absolutely no bearing on your eating goals.
You changing them was not the reason for your eating goal changing.
Going down 10 lbs was.
And you either changed your non-exercise activity level, or your goal loss per week.

I could probably figure it out if I had enough of your figures that MFP is using, starting weight BMR.

Have you even looked on your Exercise diary to see the goals there? Most aren't even aware of them is why I ask.

If you were to do MFP style, for your work, you are obviously not sedentary desk job, Lightly Active would be correct.
Then 1 lb weekly goal loss.

BMR 1754 x 1.4 activity level = 2456 non-exercise maintenance - 500 cal deficit = 1956 daily NET goal without exercise included.

You log those workouts at 80% of estimated burn and eat those back, your workout days will be eating more of course.
The 30 min running 6mph at your weight is 500 cal easy to eat back - so 2456 on those days.
If personal trainer days for 60 min is tad less intense, say lifting burn, probably 600-800 cal - so 2556-2756 on those days.

Or as you seem to be looking at TDEE deficit method. Be aware it assumes sedentary with exercise added on top. You are not.

Your work makes you Lightly active already again, just by itself.
Your exercise with 4 hrs decent workout makes that Moderately Active, just by itself.
Combine the 2 - Very active easily using the rough 5 level scale.

BMR 1754 x 1.725 activity factor = 3026 TDEE - 15% deficit = 2572 Gross eating goal every day.

Look at that - works out to be about the same.

Your personal preference for reward and goal plays important part in being compliant to select a system.
Same amount daily, plan the meals better, plan a treat. But you better do the workout.
Different amount daily, get to eat more when you do the workout. But if you don't you still have a deficit anyway.