As a triathlete, running is just 1/3rd of what I do. I never get bored with my routine. I have occasionally thought of just being a road cyclist, or just a runner, but I find I would miss the other training.

Generally a 'C' bit occasionally an 'A' if I go through a swimming phase (which isn't often at the moment). If I need a break I just do a different type of run be it the time/distance or surface

Needs a fourth option, I cycle most days for commuting but a reasonable amount of training as well.

I enjoy it in a different way to enjoying running, so the closest would be A, but it's as much about balance as a break. They're both complementary, and it avoids the need for any resistance training, which is dull as f**k.

B-prime: I do it so that *when* I get injured (because runner, amirite?), I will have a base of something else already built up to substitute in an equivalent, instead of having to build from scratch.

Mostly kidding. I really, really like road cycling in the summer. It's not so much a *break* from running, as it is a thing that is really cool in its own right. There is just something magical about biking to another town. Winter is more difficult. I'll do the elliptical, but then we're back in B-prime territory.

STrooper wrote: »

A. Old guys need an occasional break.

^ This. I go for a good long bike ride about once a week. I hurt my knee and had surgery about two and a half years ago. The bike was an integral part of my rehab as I could not run very well or far at first. I got hooked. Now I find it is a nice day when I am spared the pounding.

C. Run streak day 370+

I don't understand why you do not consider strength training as an option.

Kind of a timely topic based on an email from Runners Connect that I received this morning. Granted, this is about strength training, but I'm not sure this is way off topic (apologize if others think differently). I receive these emails because I signed up to receive emails on their website, so some others here have probably seen this too. Just thought I would share. I'm not endorsing anything, just sharing info that is on topic.

As for me...I think strength training is beneficial but right now I am on hiatus from strength training as my focus is on long, slow mileage gains, adding considerable mileage to what I was previously doing. I find that adding in the strength training negatively impacts my ability to add in those extra miles, and those extra miles are quite a workout on my running muscles already. As for cross training (cardio) I do not do any currently, also because my focus is on long, slow mileage increases (to build aerobic system further and increase pace).

---

Runners are near legendary for their aversion to strength training.

Many successful coaches and athletes in the past made a point to avoid strength training.

Moreover, it can sometimes seem like it's just one more thing to add without any measurable benefits.

The philosophical debate over the place of strength work (especially heavy weight training) has gone on for quite a while, and it’s spurred a range of research on the topic.

Luckily, we now have the research on how strength training can help you improve your running.

More importantly, we even know what type of strength training will work best.

Let's dive into some of this research...
Result of light strength work on running performance

In Sato and Mokha’s (20091) study, 28 recreational runners with 5k PRs just under 30 minutes were divided into an experimental and control group.

During the six week experiment, both groups continued their normal training routines, but the experimental group was given a set of five exercises to be performed four times a week in 2-3 sets of 10-15 repeats each.

The exercises—crunches on an exercise ball, back extensions on an exercise ball, opposite arm-leg raises while lying on the stomach, hip “bridges” on an exercise ball, and “Russian twists” (twisting the torso side-to-side while in a sit-up position) on an exercise ball—were all targeted at the hip and torso muscles, which are thought to contribute to stability while running.

The researchers hoped that strengthening these muscles would lead to better running form and a performance boost to boot.

Interestingly, the exercise program did not lead to improvements in running form, but did lead to a moderate improvement in running performance.

The experimental group dropped their 5k time by 47 seconds, while the control group only improved 17 seconds.

An astute observer might question whether the performance boost was simply due to the recreational runners taking on more training and achieving better general fitness instead of a running-specific improvement.

If this is the case, perhaps any physical intervention (moonlighting as a bricklayer, for example) would improve running performance for recreational runners.
Strength work plus additional training

This was one question addressed in a 2010 study by Alexander Ferruati and his colleagues at Ruhr University in Germany.

Twenty two recreational runners (no information was provided on their race times, but their normal training consisted of about 40min of running per day) were split into two groups.

Both groups added a 9-mile “tempo run” at about 5-10% slower than marathon pace to their weekly training schedule, but the experimental group also added two strength sessions: one targeting the upper body, and one targeting the lower body.

Each session had five exercises, most of which were done on health-club style weight machines.

While both groups improved their fitness over the eight week study and the strength group became significantly stronger, neither group was better off than the other. The strength training did not noticeably affect running economy or oxygen intake.

While Ferruati’s study seems to be a tough blow to proponents of strength work, it deserves a second look. Runners rely primarily on their legs to propel them, and Ferruati et al. had their subjects doing only one session of leg strength a week.
Leg strength training for runners

A 2008 study by Øyvind Støren and coworkers in Norway examined a more rigorous program focusing on raw leg strength.3 Støren’s protocol was four sets of four half-squats with a barbell, three times a week with three minutes of recovery, with nearly the heaviest weight the subjects could manage.

Seventeen runners (nine men and eight women) with 5k bests in the 18:40-range partook, with nine in the experimental group and eight in the control group. All of the subjects carried out their normal training during the eight week study and underwent the usual battery of physiology tests before and after the study.

The results stand in contrast to Ferruati’s study: Støren’s subjects displayed no increase in oxygen intake but a 5% increase in running economy and a startling 21% improvement in a treadmill run to exhaustion at somewhat faster than 3k race pace vs. the control group, who had no improvement on either mark. Støren et al. chalk up the improvements to increased muscular efficiency.

The runners who completed the half-squat protocol not only became stronger, but also more powerful—they were able to generate force much more quickly after the strength program.

The researchers proposed that this allowed them to have a “quicker” stride and save energy while running.
Strength training and elite runners – does it work

Still, one criticism remains: is this sort of training useful for someone whose body is already developed to a very high level of fitness? Physiology studies on elite athletes are notoriously difficult to find, since elite runners are exceedingly picky (and rightfully so!) about their training.

Fortunately for us, one extraordinary study by Philo Saunders and his coworkers at the Australian Institute of Sport4 managed to round up fifteen elite runners and have seven of them undergo a nine-week explosive lifting and jump training program. All of the runners had 3km PRs around 8:30 (equivalent to well under 15 minutes for 5km) and six of them had competed internationally.

Accordingly, the strength program they did was fairly comprehensive: three sessions a week, split between gym exercises like the leg press, hamstring curls, and back extension, and outdoor sessions done on grass consisting of bounding, skipping, double-legged hurdle jumping, and scissor jumps. As usual, both groups continued with their normal training.

At the conclusion of the study, the strength program group displayed a 4% increase in running economy at fast speeds and a smaller, non-statistically significant increase in running economy at slower speeds vs. the control group. Just like in Støren et al., these elite runners also were able to generate force more quickly, which probably accounts for their improved economy.
What you can take away from this research on strength training

In summary, it seems that the benefit of strength training for the distance runner hinges on the intensity and frequency of the exercises as well as the type of strength work being done.

A moderate, once-a-week excursion to the gym to use a few weight machines is unlikely to result in significant gains.

Yet, a more intense program focusing on an effective, targeted, running-specific strength routine is a great idea for runners of all fitness levels.
Light weights are unlikely to benefit you as much as heavy weights when it comes to improving performance.

If you’re interested in adding running-specific strength training to your schedule, we’ve created the ultimate Strength Training Guide for Runners

With 18 running-specific routines (each provided online as well as .pdf and video format), specific prescriptions for how to include in your training (5k, 10k, HM, marathon, beginners, weight loss) and interviews with experts in strength training for runners, you’ll have absolutely everything you need to plan, develop, and understand how strength training fits into YOUR training. Get yours now!

If you are strapped for time and can’t get in the various exercises the elite runners did in the Saunders study, you’re still likely to see significant benefits from including 5-7 minute strength routines after your runs.

We also provide two general strength and one cool down routine gleaned from these studies in our strength training for runners guide

In my next email I am going to talk a bit more about the third point above - heavy versus light weights.

I'll show the research on which is best and give you a good practical example on why.

Regardless, if there’s one lesson to be learned from this research, it’s that you shouldn’t bother going halfway on weights!

Coach Jeff

C. I only cross train with alternative cardio if I am unable to run.

A - I enjoy my swimming day!

C - because i m really bad at cycling. and i dont know how to swim. trying to learn but motivation wise i rather run

I used to be a "C", but now I am more "A" with a little "B". Running will always be my first love, but I am learning to really like cycling. Husband got me a beautiful carbon fiber bike for my milestone birthday last year and I am spending more and more time on it. I had to embrace swimming this past winter while I recovered from a stress fracture in my femur. As much as I try, I just don't love swimming (although I do it in hopes of taking the step to triathlon). I also am an elliptical junkie since it is close to running, but doesn't aggravate my new stress fractures (ftr, I have some bone issues).

With all that being said, my last marathon was 2.5 minutes off my PR and I ran the least I ever have in a training cycle. I don't believe in running a bunch of junk miles just for the sake of getting numbers in. I'd rather save my joints and have a hard elliptical session.

I run 5 or 6 days a week and cross train 6. My current mileage is pretty moderate at about 40 miles a week. When I start training for realz again in my next training cycle I will drop the cross training down to 2 or 3 days. Cross training for me is an at home DVD program like PIYO or Jillian michaels and a weekly yoga class.

Jillian Michaels is fantastic, my circumstances have changed I can't get out running as much as I would like so am having to improvise. Lots of runs with kids on bikes/ flickers and JM in the kitchen with me pushing the dogs off me with my kids laughing at me.

One of my neighbours runs alot of marathons, she has just completed her 350th. She was saying she dropped some running days and started doing Jillian Michaels and she saw a big improvement in her running! can't get better than that.

lporter229 wrote: »

Runners: How do you approach cross-training 1-2 days per week? (Note: By cross-training, I am referring to other forms of cardio exercise, not strength training).

A. I appreciate the break from running
B. It's a necessary evil, but I do it to minimize the risk of injury
C. No thank you...I'd rather just run

Sort of A and sort of C. I get really into cross-training when I've got mild injuries. It's nice to do something else and feel myself getting stronger in a different activity. I'd rather run, though. But I am scheduling some cross-training this summer -- probably mostly biking, maybe a bit of rowing -- just to give my legs a break once a week.