NY Times article about evolution of WW (company and those losing weight)

minimyzeme
Posts: 2,708 Member
I haven't read the full article yet but thought it might be of interest to some here...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/02/magazine/weight-watchers-oprah-losing-it-in-the-anti-dieting-age.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/02/magazine/weight-watchers-oprah-losing-it-in-the-anti-dieting-age.html
0
Replies
-
Thanks. Wow, guess they pay by the word.
To pick at a nit, I might wish I could stay on WW forever. But all good things must come to an end.
I was in for about 5 years before Points Plus came around. With PP I watched my sparsely attended Sunday morning meeting become SRO.
WTW stock had always been around $35 since I'd joined. I sat there with my finger in my ear while the room filled up and the stock went to about $75. As noted in the article, the membership number tells them how much money they will make.
By the time Oprah came around the stock was well below $10. When she bought first thing I did was check the price. At one point in 2015 WTW was trading close to $3. There's a stock market saying- sometimes when they are sick, they die.
WTW was about dead.
In my experience WW meetings are a women's club. Hasn't stopped me from going. I've been to 100s of meeting. Sometimes I meet other people who are interested in weight loss and maintaining. Mostly I meet people who are nagging themselves to weigh less but unwilling do a few simple things to lose.
If I'm at a meeting with 25 people, I'd bet at most 5 have kept a journal for 7 days. That would be on a good week.
Definitely noticed when WW went out of the weight loss business. ML just flat out told us one day. But nothing really changed, they just dropped the pretense. Sure all the new stuff was focus grouped to the max. And besides, why risk losing a member over a WI?0 -
A really long article that says dieting is hard and doesn't often produce sustainable results. Some people say you should just accept the way you are. On the other hand, weighing less has lots of benefits.
For me it is hard to lose weight. Maintaining is hard. It may always be hard. But if I don't keep working at it, I know what will happen.4 -
Thank you for sharing, I enjoyed reading the article, although @GoRun2 is right that there isn't any new information presented.
The article encapsulates why I'm no longer a WW member though. The scale is not my focus, healthy choices are, and WW at it's core is still a weight loss group that is centered around the scale (no matter what their marketing team says). I prefer to stay mindful of my intake, keep active, and I believe the scale will follow my habits. The amount of stress the author has over losing weight is not something I ever want to experience again, although it is definitely something I experienced in the past.1 -
I think that getting away from all the negatives as best we can is a very positive step. If I can't get beyond the negatives and the negative words it is like beating my head against the wall and not helpful.
I know that for some "lifestyle" was a negative word since we still have to be ever vigilant and mindful. I personally thought it was much better than the old you "must eat THIS and can NEVER eat THAT" mentality that went with the negative connotations about diet and dieting. Diet after all is merely what we eat but we don't view it that way. For me I would be hard pressed to not think of the way I do things as at least my current lifestyle. I also like the idea of getting away from deprivation. Sure it is a fine line between being able to enjoy foods and beverages less frequently and/or in smaller portions but I do enjoy food. I wouldn't last long except maybe if I was diabetic and forced to change or die with some of the diet plans out there.
Gosh I knew on WW at least in the back of my mind that was going to be for the long haul and NOT somehow a "fix". I never thought there would be an end or an end in sight. Yes I probably do feel more guilt than I should over some chocolate I eat but I enjoy it nonetheless.1 -
I remember the meeting where they presented the 'data'. That when looking at people's new years resolutions, weight loss was 3rd or 4th on the list (getting fit and eating healthy being higher on the list). I actually laughed out loud. Because really, what is 'getting fit' or 'eating healthy'? Other than nebulous, non-measurable (for the most part) things to say so one can be successful without doing what they really want to do. Which is to lose weight.
I don't know if WW's recent financial recovery is due to Ms. Oprah, the new approach or the fact that people are losing more weight on a regimen that, for all the talk about how nobody wants to be on a diet, is more diet-y than it has been in years.0 -
Ya, I started reading the article yesterday morning but it seemed to go on forever and I still haven't finished it! I did read the shortened version from you all and on another board so I feel like I got the jist.
One thing that occurs to me as a guy on a diet is that there are definitely some aspects to dieting that are unique to the genders and as pointed out, for a long time this was primarily a women's gig. I can't fully appreciate what all is tied in with that and how some of those things have changed over time: societal expectations (think Leave It to Beaver, etc.), traditional (& contemporary) home responsibilities, work setting dynamics and demands, etc. Quite honestly though I probably don't fully understand all the intricacies, I can see where the whole context of weight loss would be more challenging for women than men, generally-speaking.0 -
When I started 1 of the semi misleading mind tricks was "eat anything you want."
Then Points Plus jammed the room with free fruit. That was really a version of "eat as much as you want."
Now it seems to be "do what you want."
Didn't catch this in the article, but I wonder what their customer retention # is. Always been fascinated with the WW revolving door.0 -
minimyzeme wrote: »One thing that occurs to me as a guy on a diet is that there are definitely some aspects to dieting that are unique to the genders and as pointed out, for a long time this was primarily a women's gig. I can't fully appreciate what all is tied in with that and how some of those things have changed over time: societal expectations (think Leave It to Beaver, etc.), traditional (& contemporary) home responsibilities, work setting dynamics and demands, etc. Quite honestly though I probably don't fully understand all the intricacies, I can see where the whole context of weight loss would be more challenging for women than men, generally-speaking.
I think this is a really interesting point and one that doesn't get talked about enough. I think there are definitely gendered differences to weight loss and weight expectations. One that came up in weight watchers a lot for women is the expectation that they always put everyone else first and their own health last. One positive thing I think Weight Watchers has done over the years is to tell women it's okay to prioritize themselves.
For guys, there's a whole different set of challenges since it seems to be more taboo to be openly on a diet. I see this with my SO sometimes, especially since he has a job that requires a lot of networking/social events. It's hard to stay OP when you're constantly going to happy hours/getting invited out to burgers and it almost reflects poorly on him to choose seltzer water and salads over burgers and beer, as if those options make him less masculine. Whereas as a female, these seem like completely normal choices when eating out.
1 -
Rachel0778 wrote: »I think this is a really interesting point and one that doesn't get talked about enough. I think there are definitely gendered differences to weight loss and weight expectations. One that came up in weight watchers a lot for women is the expectation that they always put everyone else first and their own health last. One positive thing I think Weight Watchers has done over the years is to tell women it's okay to prioritize themselves.
For guys, there's a whole different set of challenges since it seems to be more taboo to be openly on a diet. I see this with my SO sometimes, especially since he has a job that requires a lot of networking/social events. It's hard to stay OP when you're constantly going to happy hours/getting invited out to burgers and it almost reflects poorly on him to choose seltzer water and salads over burgers and beer, as if those options make him less masculine. Whereas as a female, these seem like completely normal choices when eating out.
You hit the big pink elephant squarely in the butt here! I know that for me, when people at work look at me funny for weighing food and make comments - it's MUCH more comfortable socially to excuse myself with an upcoming weigh in for competition than to explain that my goal is to get to an ideal weight and fitness.
Socially, men aren't supposed to have health issues... we are supposed to suck it up, walk it off, etc... and basically pretend that they don't exist... and excess weight/fat is a health issue... so if a man is "manning up" (aka ignoring their health), then they are expected to eat as if nothing can possibly hurt them, regardless of what they look or feel.2
This discussion has been closed.