Is it safe to eat extremely low calories on keto?

Options
CBell223
CBell223 Posts: 36 Member
Hello all,
I'm brand new to the group and to keto. Since 2013 I've been a "track you food, calorie restriction, high protein, low fat, moderate carb" person. (I spent some time with the "eat more to lose weight group too) I lost 130 lbs. over 2.5 years doing that, but then went nuts, couldn't maintain it anymore and gained back just over 100 of it over the next 3 years (mostly abusing carbs). So, I've decided to try keto to see if I can lose again and this time, keep it off. Carbs are my drug, so I thought this might be easier to just not have them in my life.
I'm only a week in, but I've been completely shocked by the change in my appitite. I've done a lot of reading and most people suggest that you don't track, but just eat with your hunger drives. I've been trying to do both, mostly to gather the data. What I've found is, I just haven't needed or wanted all the food I plan out for the day. I'm just not hungry (which is so weird). Just two weeks ago I was struggling to hold myself to 2200 cals/day (a 20% deficit). I was hungry. But on keto, I don't think I've eaten more than 1600 cals/day yet. That is well below my BMR (which I've been told you should never, ever eat below). But, I keep thinking, if I'm in ketosis and my body is using my stored fat for energy and I'm not hungry, and I'm eating enough to get the basic nutrition I need, do I really need to worry about going below my BMR? Maybe my hunger drives will change as I get further into this, but I have so much weight to lose, I'd love for it to be ok for me to eat so little...if it's safe. I've done a ton of reading and I can't find an answer to this. Right now, I'm hoping it's ok. Not only because I may be able to lose weight faster but also, I don't really know how I would eat much more than I am.

Replies

  • Emmapatterson1729
    Emmapatterson1729 Posts: 1,296 Member
    edited September 2019
    Options
    When they talk about not worrying about calories, it means don't worry about going too high. Whether in ketosis or not, muscle mass loss can occur when eating too low of calories or electrolytes (especially eating keto) can get too low. Either of these can cause heart failure.

    I don't think @1600 this would be a worry. You're safe. But yes, keto kills the appetite! A lot have trouble getting in even 1000 calories. Also why most start IF naturally on keto.

    When I've lost my appetite from eating keto, I add a few tbsp of olive oil, butter, and/or a couple of servings of fatty cheeses to everything I do eat. I can make a small one egg dish around 1000 calories, just adding fats.

    Good luck..I just try and warn others against eating too low, because I developed heart failure from it. It deformed my body with 100 lb water retention pretty much overnight, along with other organ failure, and a lot of hormonal problems. I try to always warn others against eating too low or thinking about dropping too low.

  • tcunbeliever
    tcunbeliever Posts: 8,219 Member
    Options
    I wouldn't expect your BMR to be lower than 1600.

    If you used a BMR calculator just using height/weight/age - it's probably not accurate for someone with a high body fat percentage, because all the numbers it uses are based on average body fat.

    If you have any idea what your estimated body fat is (either from a scale, or measurements, or just a visual guess), then you are probably going to get a more accurate BMR from one of the formulas that uses Lean Body Mass rather than just height/weight/age.

    This is true for everyone who is not an average body fat percentage.

    Also, you mention menopause in your profile, but you don't have your age listed...so just on the off chance that you are early to menopause, then the drop in BMR that typically hits around menopause may not be factored into a BMR calculator that uses Age as a metric.

    That's just a guess because you don't look old enough for menopause in your photos.

    Assuming the BMR you are using is accurate, then yes, you do want to eat at least that amount. Not necessarily every day, a day here and there that are low will not be too much of a problem. The hormone shifts will kick in after about 3 weeks of starvation (again, this is averages) so, a few days or even a week are not that big a deal. Long term is a problem. Long term you start metabolizing muscle and bone and being unable to repair your body. You have excess fat for energy, but fat doesn't really provide nutrients beyond energy. Your body needs other nutrients and raw materials to maintain itself in a healthy state.
  • cgcrutch
    cgcrutch Posts: 223 Member
    Options
    Body fat also stores micronutrients, not just calories. That's how people are able to do extended fasts, bodies that aren't already deficient in some way have stores of necessary micronutrients.
  • cgcrutch
    cgcrutch Posts: 223 Member
    Options
    Also, not eating doesn't mean your body is starving. True starvation doesn't happen until body fat stores are depleted, not just after a specific time of no eating. BUT, a diet that's too low calorie every day can decrease your metabolism. You could try alternate day fasting, that should definitely leave plenty of time for your appetite to bounce back between meals LOL! https://www.dietdoctor.com/fasting-muscle-mass
  • cgcrutch
    cgcrutch Posts: 223 Member
    Options
    I wouldn't call appetite returning a problem tho. I think the OP would want her appetite to return so she doesn't have to worry about eating extremely low calories. ..Or am I misinterpreting to concern?
  • Emmapatterson1729
    Emmapatterson1729 Posts: 1,296 Member
    Options
    The problem is... once you fat adapt. Your hunger returns. The you have to work at it again.
    Keto or low carb isn’t a free for all.

    This is so true for me!! Appetite returned with a vengeance!

    Now, I'm having to reign in my calories a little and workout to burn calories. Still not in the mood to snack or hungry upon waking... But not getting full off three bites of chicken or steak like I was in the beginning.

  • CBell223
    CBell223 Posts: 36 Member
    Options
    Honestly, I'd love to be eating as few calories as possible (just to speed up the weight loss) as long as I'm not doing any damage to me, my metabolism or in anyway sabatoging my efforts to "keep it off" forever this time. It's only because of those fears that I'm worried about how little I'm eating right now. I don't feel hungry, so not worred that I'm starving. I Just don't want to be damaging anything. But, I'm not in ketosis yet (getting frustrated, but it's only been 5 or 6 days, so I'll get there) It's interesting to know that my appitite will return. So maybe at some point, this won't really be an issue.
    To answer Tcunbeliever...I just turned 57. That photo is from 4 years ago, near the low of my most recent weight loss. So, I'm older and about 70 lbs heavier now. Currently 337 lbs. 5'-8" and active. I am...post menopausal. I had a hysterectomy earlier this year, so, that is all done. My planned 25% deficit calorie goal had been 2200/day (and that was a struggle, but so far on keto, I'm doing 1400-1700 and not wanting more. I pushed myself to 1700 yesterday. This is very weird, fun and exciting.
    In my dreams, I'd like to believe that since I am so heavy, and ketosis uses stored fat as energy....once I'm in ketosis, if I eat enough to meet my nutritional needs (which I understand you can do in about 1200 calories) is there harm in just letting the rest of my energy needs be met by my stored fat (if I'm not feeling hungry or deprived) ? (This is sort of a second question. My initial post was about how little I was wanting to eat during this transistion.)
  • chiefkays
    chiefkays Posts: 24 Member
    Options
    I've only been at this for a few months, but I'll give you my n=1 personal experience. I started 352 lbs, so my RMR was calculated around 2500 (for what that's worth). I aimed to average 2000 cals a day originally, plus some extra protein on workout days.

    In the first 2 months where I was tracking religiously, I only hit 2000 cals maybe a half dozen times. Most days I just wasn't that hungry, especially after I stopped eating breakfast because I wasn't hungry until after noon. So I averaged around 1600 cals a day, even if I worked out. I stopped tracking in August, just eating when I'm hungry, and I'm still losing consistently. I can exercise and don't get tired. So in my case, my plentiful fat stores seem to be making up the difference.

    I can't speak to long term damage to metabolism or nutrient levels from eating way under RMR, but speaking just for myself, I've continued to lose weight and feel great.
  • tcunbeliever
    tcunbeliever Posts: 8,219 Member
    Options
    The average person can only metabolize about 1% body fat per week...so no matter how little you eat, your body can currently only replace about 12K calories per week (3.37 lbs x 3,500 cal/lb). The math will shift as you lose weight.

    Eating any greater a deficit isn't going to burn fat. But it will compromise muscle tissue.

    Based on your previous comments your maintenance is 2750/day (2200 was a 20% deficit in your original post - if it's a 25% deficit then your maintenance is 2933).

    So, in theory (because it's based on averages) you can be short of that by 1600 calories a day and be burning max fat possible...so, minimum intake 1150 cals (or 1333)...and yes, if you are eating quality nutrition, you can fit your nutritional needs into 1200 cal/day.

    You should lose about 3 lbs a week to start...as you get smaller and your fat stores deplete, your weight loss will slow, and this is normal, so don't panic.

    Max fat loss is a great goal, but be alert for fatigue, muscle/joint soreness, sleep issues or other symptoms that you are putting too much stress on your body...maybe consider a couple weeks at maintenance or at a smaller deficit if you start to have issues.

    Not all nutrients are fat soluble, so getting good nutrition is still important even though you are using fat stores. Getting plenty of salt and protein is always important.

    I hope you will keep us posted on your results!!! And thank you for being willing to share the numbers, I love doing the math!!!
  • rmac18
    rmac18 Posts: 185 Member
    Options
    The average person can only metabolize about 1% body fat per week...so no matter how little you eat, your body can currently only replace about 12K calories per week (3.37 lbs x 3,500 cal/lb). The math will shift as you lose weight.

    Eating any greater a deficit isn't going to burn fat. But it will compromise muscle tissue.

    Based on your previous comments your maintenance is 2750/day (2200 was a 20% deficit in your original post - if it's a 25% deficit then your maintenance is 2933).

    So, in theory (because it's based on averages) you can be short of that by 1600 calories a day and be burning max fat possible...so, minimum intake 1150 cals (or 1333)...and yes, if you are eating quality nutrition, you can fit your nutritional needs into 1200 cal/day.

    You should lose about 3 lbs a week to start...as you get smaller and your fat stores deplete, your weight loss will slow, and this is normal, so don't panic.

    Max fat loss is a great goal, but be alert for fatigue, muscle/joint soreness, sleep issues or other symptoms that you are putting too much stress on your body...maybe consider a couple weeks at maintenance or at a smaller deficit if you start to have issues.

    Not all nutrients are fat soluble, so getting good nutrition is still important even though you are using fat stores. Getting plenty of salt and protein is always important.

    I hope you will keep us posted on your results!!! And thank you for being willing to share the numbers, I love doing the math!!!

    This is fascinating, thanks for sharing.
  • rmac18
    rmac18 Posts: 185 Member
    Options
    The problem is... once you fat adapt. Your hunger returns. The you have to work at it again.
    Keto or low carb isn’t a free for all.


    This explains something, Thanks for sharing. I thought it was odd that I'm all of a sudden hungry more frequently. Maybe I'm just now fat adapted??? I'm a little over 3 months in and T2D but the past few weeks I'm hungry more often. I thought Fat Adapted would mean I'd be less hungry...
  • rmac18
    rmac18 Posts: 185 Member
    Options
    There is so much good info in these forums. I learn new stuff all the time.
  • Emmapatterson1729
    Emmapatterson1729 Posts: 1,296 Member
    edited October 2019
    Options
    And there's the amount that causes long term organ damage. At 5'8" going down to 1200 or less can do a lot of damage. (Not a fast or Just a day here or there, but eating that low over a time can cause muscle mass loss and organ failure, especially if active). The heart is a muscle and experiences muscle mass loss like any other muscle in body. Except when heart loses muscle mass it causes chamber/s to swell and slow. It can't pump fluid, so entire body starts swelling (mine was over 100 lbs in less than two months). Then fluid pushes on other organs... Can't breathe due to fluid on lungs. I couldn't breathe walking from bed to toilet.

    1200 is meant as a minimum for someone who is very short and immobile!

    Losing weight "quickly" is not worth the risk of death. When dropping that low, hunger signals break due to hormonal changes (adrenaline, endorphins, cortisol, etc). So when I ate very low calorie, I never felt hungry or starved. I felt healthy and fine until my heart failed and I woke up unable to breathe and all over body edema.

    I recently posted my before and afters over three months here in group. I'm 5'8" I started at 1410 no working out, pretty sedentary. Was losing too fast. At about a month in upped my calories to around 1600-1700 to slow weight loss down... But even at 1700 am still dropping fairly rapid.

  • CBell223
    CBell223 Posts: 36 Member
    Options
    EmmaP --- I'm so sorry to hear you have gone through so much. Can I ask how low your calories were? Also, did you have any warning at all? Did you feel good and satieated before that all happened?
    Tcunbeliever --- Can I ask, about the numbers you ran...you said a body could metabolize 1% body fat per week, but then the numbers you ran were on my total body weight. Not an estimate of my body fat. Is that right? Or should I be running those numbers based on an estimate of the weight of fat I currently have? Also, I've seen you on other discussions talk about metobolic problems starting at 3 months. Is that even true if I run this calculation you've given here and both, stay in the right range, and also pay attention to how I'm feeling and take breaks if needed?
    Thanks everyone for your input. I'm still not in ketosis. Very frustrating, but...hanging in there. I am losing weight though, and enjoying the food, and enjoying not always being hungry, so I'm fine.
  • tcunbeliever
    tcunbeliever Posts: 8,219 Member
    Options
    Your overall percentage body fat is a calculation based on your total body weight. So, 1% = 1% no matter if your body fat is 50% or 10%, in a week you can only drop to 49% or 9%.

    Because body fat is a percentage of total weight, that number is shifting every week that you lose weight, particularly if your goal is to always be losing fat and not lean body mass. So if you want to crunch the numbers every week, fantastic, that's the most accurate way to hit maximum fat loss over time.

    I hope that made more sense.

    The 3 months thing is a hormone response to reduced calories. Like everything else, it's based on averages. It's stressful for your body to rely on adipose fat - this is fat your body chose to store in case of famine, not eating as much as before will make you body think there is in fact a famine. Your body will freak out about this at some point.

    Probably the biggest thing to watch for is symptoms of adrenal fatigue. Adrenal fatigue is really just overstimulated adrenals due to increased cortisol from weight loss (or anything else), but it's commonly called adrenal fatigue even though your adrenals don't really need a nap and it's a bit poorly named thing. Excessive fatigue, trouble sleeping, cravings/excessive hunger, anger, things like that. Cortisol will hit your adrenals first, which will then cascade into your thyroid, and on throughout the entire endocrine system. Most hormone testing won't show out of range until you are at the crash and burn level of problems. It's not good to let it get that far.

    Again - this is all based on averages. Some people manage a calorie deficit for a full year or two and never run into the hormone response. Maybe they destress a lot in other ways, maybe they don't produce a lot of cortisol, maybe their body just isn't sensitive to cortisol. Some people hit this wall sooner. 3 months is an average, but if you are paying attention to your body, you should notice that "something is off" feeling. Or, you can go out of your way to make the process as stress free as possible with good nutrition and other stress relief methods like yoga, or hot baths, or whatever.

    My favorite adrenal supporting herb is licorice root - it makes a lovely tea and it's a cheap supplement. There is a small portion of the population that will experience an increase in blood pressure with consumption of licorice, so it should not be taken by anyone with high blood pressure. There is a TCM (traditional chineese medicine) formula called Nervous Fatigue that will also be very nourishing for the adrenals and does not contain any herbs that will boost blood pressure.

    For me, I take licorice every day when I am in a deficit. If I don't, I usually hit that cranky semi-homicidal point where even trees start to look edible about 3-6 weeks into a diet, and it's not fun for anyone. Not everyone is a fan of herbs, that cool too, but do listen to your body and adjust if you start to feel something is not quite right.
  • Emmapatterson1729
    Emmapatterson1729 Posts: 1,296 Member
    Options
    @CBell223

    Was trying to drop weight, most days ate around 1100. Some days "just wasn't hungry" and would come in around 800, other days might fulfill a craving and end up around 1200.

    No Warning, wasn't anorexic thin, no bones showing. I felt wonderful, healthy, and strong. Never felt hungry, weak, or sore.

    I gained a couple of pounds, even though "dieting" and my doctor blew me off. Gained a few more pounds and was a little short of breath. My doctor blew me off again, said I was having panic attacks about gaining a few pounds.

    I (literally) woke up one morning, my toes wouldn't touch the ground feet were swelled so huge, my stomach was so swelled, it hung down in my lap, my breast swelled from perky D cups to H cups sagging down in lap. I didn't recognize my own body. My late husband, pushed his thumb down into my leg deep and his indention just stayed there. He said I was having severe edema, and I needed to go to doctor immediately. I couldn't breathe, felt like I was suffocating.

    My doctor was still trying to say stress and blow me off as a crazy female, while a different doctor, in same practice, eavesdropped in the hall.

    OMG ..she came in screaming at my doctor "She's having heart failure." She screamed at the nurse to get a gurney, call the cardiologist, and the pulmonary specialist, and meet us in the ER. Needless to say, she became my new doctor!

    ICU for three weeks. I gained over 100 lbs of all water retention by the time I checked out. (Permanent body deformities).

    I was given two choices, heart transplant list or water pills, potassium pills, blood pressure meds, (13 prescriptions total) with a low sodium diet and no activity and wait to see if heart heals.

    Was told with both choices, my chances of survival were not good. I chose meds, diet, bed rest, and see if heart heals.

    It did, three months later, still huge with lots of loose skin and heavier weight, but was told (through echocardiogram) heart was functioning at pretty normal level and could return to a normal activity level.

    Now, I try to warn others that this can happen. I had no idea this was a possibility from eating too low of calories, combined with exercise or more active lifestyle. I wish someone had warned me... Just trying to lose a few, thinking I was in-tune with and listening to my body... When in reality, my body's hunger signals were broken.

  • qweck3
    qweck3 Posts: 346 Member
    Options
    A suggestion would be to go get an RMR test done and get your maintenance calorie numbers every few months. Takes the guessing out of it. At one point I needed 3700 just to maintain weight now I'm down to 2300. Metabolism slows down and revs up with a lot of it tied into lean muscle levels and many other things. Lots of moving parts but eating properly with a small deficit along with exercise burn with some muscle work will get you success if you play the long plan vs chasing a random number on a scale. Keto, low carb, plant based, paleo all work. Some just have bigger benefits than others in the long game. I'm a big fan of keto for short periods because it naturally limits the hunger hormones without pills. 18 months of fat adapted (confirmed with RMR testing) and I eat over 100 total carbs a day. The trick is timing and fiber :smiley: