Graphic Abortion Ad to Air During Superbowl.

1235714

Replies

  • macpatti
    macpatti Posts: 4,280 Member
    I seem to remember we had exactly this debate on another topic?! :laugh: I suspect we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one as well.
    Probably, and agreed!
  • BrettPGH
    BrettPGH Posts: 4,716 Member
    I don't think for a second making it illegal means it will stop. I do believe it will stop some, especially ones who are law abiding citizens, which you cannot tell me are not the majority of people seeking an abortion.

    And what about the ones who get an abortion that is now illegal? Jail time? Stiff fine? This question never gets answered...
    My point is that pro-life doesn't have to equate to religion. When I speak out against abortion, I'm not forcing my religious views on someone. I'm speaking up for the babies who have no voice. Just as my telling someone murder is wrong doesn't have to mean I'm forcing my religious beliefs on them.

    Forgive me if I'm mistaken but didn't you yourself say you've been outside of clinics praying the rosary?
  • Regmama
    Regmama Posts: 399 Member
    I don't buy into the whole, "People are going to do it anyway, so make it legal and safe for them" bit.

    I think history would prove you wrong - abortions of one sort or another have been happening since time immemorial, and will undoubtedly continue to happen as long as women fall pregnant unexpectedly. The illegality of the process in some countries has not stopped the practise, merely made it covert and more dangerous.
    I think more would not abort if it were illegal, maybe think more long term about their actions, but yes, not 100% eliminated. Heck, the Romans threw their unwanted babies in the river regularly. In that, you are correct.
  • macpatti
    macpatti Posts: 4,280 Member
    Forgive me if I'm mistaken but didn't you yourself say you've been outside of clinics praying the rosary?
    Our Pro-Life Club does that, yes. But we do not say one word to anyone entering the clinic. We are not trying to force our religion on the women. We are there to pray for the babies being murdered inside the building.

    What I'm referring to is when I counsel girls about abortion. I don't take the approach that the church believes this or that. I take the approach that I want them to understand what all the implications are of making that choice. Of course I want to change their minds on abortion, but I'm not there to convert them to Catholocism.
  • atomiclauren
    atomiclauren Posts: 689 Member
    Ok Patti. But if it's illegal there will need to be a punishment for these girls. They ARE going to do it anyway. Maybe not all, but a decent number of them. History and the world as it is now shows that. You can't just make it illegal and assume it's all stopped. Making it illegal means there's now a punishment aspect involved.

    So what is it?


    Also I know some atheists can be and are pro-life. But I know I'm not talking out of school when I say the vast majority are religious believers.

    Yes, I'd like to know what punishments would be and for the doctor (or whoever does it), too. I haven't heard mention of that anywhere - has it been brought up by politicians?

    Are we talking capital punishment here, and for both parties since they would be considered co-conspirators in a murder?
    What would serve as evidence for indictment? Medical records? If so, what if there weren't any, since criminalized medical activities don't necessary come with paperwork?
  • macpatti
    macpatti Posts: 4,280 Member
    Yes, I'd like to know what punishments would be and for the doctor (or whoever does it), too. I haven't heard mention of that anywhere - has it been brought up by politicians?
    Are we talking capital punishment here, and for both parties since they would be considered co-conspirators in a murder? Would medical records serve as evidence for indictment? If so, what if there weren't any, since criminalized medical activities don't necessary come with paperwork?
    I suppose the act of having an abortion would need to be defined as a specific crime. Is it murder? Are the physicians guilty of accessory to murder? You can't tell me if it was legally considered murder, we'd have the same number of abortions. We wouldn't.
  • BrettPGH
    BrettPGH Posts: 4,716 Member
    Forgive me if I'm mistaken but didn't you yourself say you've been outside of clinics praying the rosary?
    Our Pro-Life Club does that, yes. But we do not say one word to anyone entering the clinic. We are not trying to force our religion on the women. We are there to pray for the babies being murdered inside the building.

    What I'm referring to is when I counsel girls about abortion. I don't take the approach that the church believes this or that. I take the approach that I want them to understand what all the implications are of making that choice. Of course I want to change their minds on abortion, but I'm not there to convert them to Catholocism.

    Ok Patti well I think it's a noble and good thing you do for those girls.
  • Regmama
    Regmama Posts: 399 Member
    I just don't think women should be punished for becoming pregnant unexpectedly by being forced to endure unsafe processes, when safe ones are available. By making abortion illegal, this is essentially what would be forced upon women who make this choice.
    How can you unexpectedly become pregnant when it is known that there is a chance one can become pregnant when one has sex?
  • BrettPGH
    BrettPGH Posts: 4,716 Member
    I suppose the act of having an abortion would need to be defined as a specific crime. Is it murder? Are the physicians guilty of accessory to murder? You can't tell me if it was legally considered murder, we'd have the same number of abortions. We wouldn't.

    No there would be less. No one's saying there wouldn't be. But there would still be abortions.

    So is it murder? Should we sentence these girls to prison?
  • BrettPGH
    BrettPGH Posts: 4,716 Member
    How can you unexpectedly become pregnant when it is known that there is a chance one can become pregnant when one has sex?

    And if you drive a car there's a pretty good chance you will have a car accident at some point. Doesn't mean we say "Hey you were driving, you knew what could happen."
  • fbmandy55
    fbmandy55 Posts: 5,263 Member
    I just don't think women should be punished for becoming pregnant unexpectedly by being forced to endure unsafe processes, when safe ones are available.

    I know you are replying to macpatti so, my apologies but pregnancy is the outcome of sex. It's not a punishment, everyone knows that you get pregnant by having sex. If woman doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't be having sex. But because abortions are so readily available, I don't think women really care about that risk.
  • castadiva
    castadiva Posts: 2,016 Member
    Once the foetus is viable without the mother's body, then, and only then, in my opinion, it gains equal, but not superior, rights to be considered.
    You do realize that a fetus can survive without the mother's body for months before she is scheduled to deliver, right? So, are you saying you believe abortion is okay during the earlier stages of pregnancy, but not later?

    What I am saying is that once the foetus is viable outside the womb, and could survive in reasonable expectation of health without the woman's body, then its rights ought to be considered equally. Given that the generally-accepted medical point of viability is around the six-and-a-half to seven month point (the outer limit is 23 weeks, just shy of six months, but most specialists would withold intensive neonatal care until around 26 weeks gestation, as the expectation of a positive outcome and a healthy child at this point is so low) , though, the question is fairly academic, as the overwhelming majority of abortions take place well before this point. I think it's unlikely that a woman would continue a pregnancy for six or seven months before seeking an abortion, if that was what she had decided to do, unless through dire medical necessity.
  • VeganInTraining
    VeganInTraining Posts: 1,319 Member
    I suppose the act of having an abortion would need to be defined as a specific crime. Is it murder? Are the physicians guilty of accessory to murder? You can't tell me if it was legally considered murder, we'd have the same number of abortions. We wouldn't.

    No there would be less. No one's saying there wouldn't be. But there would still be abortions.

    So is it murder? Should we sentence these girls to prison?

    If we want to get technical the Dr would be the one actually comitting the act, the woman would be the accessory. I would say give the "Dr's" prison, and definitely some kind of penalty for the woman. I have a friend who has had multiple abortions simply because she doesn't like to use condoms and she doesn't like the pill. If it were illegal she wouldn't have done it, especially if she had to go to some quack who didn't know what he was doing
  • atomiclauren
    atomiclauren Posts: 689 Member
    If we want to get technical the Dr would be the one actually comitting the act, the woman would be the accessory. I would say give the "Dr's" prison, and definitely some kind of penalty for the woman. I have a friend who has had multiple abortions simply because she doesn't like to use condoms and she doesn't like the pill. If it were illegal she wouldn't have done it, especially if she had to go to some quack who didn't know what he was doing

    She wouldn't have done what? Had abortions? Had unsafe sex? Had sex at all? (just trying to clarify) -
  • fbmandy55
    fbmandy55 Posts: 5,263 Member
    I suppose the act of having an abortion would need to be defined as a specific crime. Is it murder? Are the physicians guilty of accessory to murder? You can't tell me if it was legally considered murder, we'd have the same number of abortions. We wouldn't.

    No there would be less. No one's saying there wouldn't be. But there would still be abortions.

    So is it murder? Should we sentence these girls to prison?

    I think a certain degree of murder is acceptable. Or whatever punishment a woman receives for delivering a baby and discarding it. Abuse of a corpse, self-abortion, etc...
  • FearAnLoathing
    FearAnLoathing Posts: 4,852 Member
    I just don't think women should be punished for becoming pregnant unexpectedly by being forced to endure unsafe processes, when safe ones are available.

    I know you are replying to macpatti so, my apologies but pregnancy is the outcome of sex. It's not a punishment, everyone knows that you get pregnant by having sex. If woman doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't be having sex. But because abortions are so readily available, I don't think women really care about that risk.

    When I got pregnant I was n the pill and using condoms
  • VeganInTraining
    VeganInTraining Posts: 1,319 Member
    If we want to get technical the Dr would be the one actually comitting the act, the woman would be the accessory. I would say give the "Dr's" prison, and definitely some kind of penalty for the woman. I have a friend who has had multiple abortions simply because she doesn't like to use condoms and she doesn't like the pill. If it were illegal she wouldn't have done it, especially if she had to go to some quack who didn't know what he was doing

    She wouldn't have done what? Had abortions? Had unsafe sex? Had sex at all? (just trying to clarify) -

    had the abortions...and possibly not had unsafe sex...she at least would have learned after the first unplanned pregnancy
  • Regmama
    Regmama Posts: 399 Member
    I just don't think women should be punished for becoming pregnant unexpectedly by being forced to endure unsafe processes, when safe ones are available.

    I know you are replying to macpatti so, my apologies but pregnancy is the outcome of sex. It's not a punishment, everyone knows that you get pregnant by having sex. If woman doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't be having sex. But because abortions are so readily available, I don't think women really care about that risk.

    When I got pregnant I was n the pill and using condoms
    Yet, those things are not 100% effective when properly used and they state so. There is always a chance of pregnancy.
  • macpatti
    macpatti Posts: 4,280 Member
    If we want to get technical the Dr would be the one actually comitting the act, the woman would be the accessory. I would say give the "Dr's" prison, and definitely some kind of penalty for the woman. I have a friend who has had multiple abortions simply because she doesn't like to use condoms and she doesn't like the pill. If it were illegal she wouldn't have done it, especially if she had to go to some quack who didn't know what he was doing
    Agreed.
  • FearAnLoathing
    FearAnLoathing Posts: 4,852 Member
    I just don't think women should be punished for becoming pregnant unexpectedly by being forced to endure unsafe processes, when safe ones are available.

    I know you are replying to macpatti so, my apologies but pregnancy is the outcome of sex. It's not a punishment, everyone knows that you get pregnant by having sex. If woman doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't be having sex. But because abortions are so readily available, I don't think women really care about that risk.

    When I got pregnant I was n the pill and using condoms
    Yet, those things are not 100% effective when properly used and they state so. There is always a chance of pregnancy.

    There is a chance of pregnancy with anything,I know someone who got pregnant after having her tubes tied
  • macpatti
    macpatti Posts: 4,280 Member
    When I got pregnant I was n the pill and using condoms
    I was on the pill when I got pregnant with my oldest son. Everyone knows that the only foolproof form of birth control is abstinence, so anyone who is having sex and gets pregnant had some knowledge that it could happen.
  • castadiva
    castadiva Posts: 2,016 Member
    I just don't think women should be punished for becoming pregnant unexpectedly by being forced to endure unsafe processes, when safe ones are available.

    I know you are replying to macpatti so, my apologies but pregnancy is the outcome of sex. It's not a punishment, everyone knows that you get pregnant by having sex. If woman doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't be having sex. But because abortions are so readily available, I don't think women really care about that risk.

    Haven't figured out how to quote two people at once, so this is @Regmama as well. Yes, pregnancy is a possible outcome of sex. It is still possible to become pregnant despite having taken reasonable precautions against doing so. Hormonal birth control is not 100% reliable, condoms can split, physical barriers do not always work. If you've used precautions such as these, and they happen to have failed on one of the approximately three days/month when a woman is sufficiently fertile to become pregnant, AND you actually fall pregnant, a) you've been very unlucky, and b) you have fallen pregnant unexpectedly.

    The fact that so many women DO use birth control when it is available (and there are enough countries where modern prophylaxis isn't available, and alternatives are used to show that this is a worldwide concern!) is surely evidence that most women DO care about the risk of pregnancy, and take steps to prevent it. Some don't, and as I have already said, I think it is deeply irresponsible to use abortion as your preferred type of Birth control. That all said, the punishment I was referring to is not the pregnancy itself, but being forced to endure an unsafe, often unsanitary procedure if you choose to end the unexpected pregnancy, if legal, medically safe abortion has been removed as an option.

    " If woman doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't be having sex." - Really?! I have to confess I'm rather at a loss for words here. The whole point of female contraception, and the fight for that to be legal in the first place, was that women are just as entitled as men to experience sexual desire, and to find intimacy, joy and pleasure in sex, without the fear of unwanted, unplanned pregnancy, which inevitably complicates and compromises their lives. If that point has really been missed, and we are still projecting Victorian-era views on women...I'm gobsmacked.
  • macpatti
    macpatti Posts: 4,280 Member
    And if you drive a car there's a pretty good chance you will have a car accident at some point. Doesn't mean we say "Hey you were driving, you knew what could happen."
    Sure we can. If someone is driving and has a car accident, they can't say, "Hey....I didn't think I was going to have a car accident. I tried really hard not to have a car accident". Your point is valid........for my argument. You KNEW by driving there was a risk of a car accident. The only way to know 100% you won't have one is to not drive. So, if you drive, even though you don't want to have a car accident, you'll have consequences and be responsible for the outcome. Unless you can find a doctor that will "make it go away" for you. Wait, that last part didn't fit......
  • atomiclauren
    atomiclauren Posts: 689 Member
    So as it stands now, it would be considered first degree murder, punishable usually by death or life in prison:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_punishments_for_murder_in_the_United_States

    The deal is, women have to be abstinent to be 100% sure since there would be no recourse for failed birth control or bad decisions except having an unwanted pregnancy, giving the child up for adoption, or illegally seeking an abortion. I just don't know how realistic abstinence is, despite all that.
  • macpatti
    macpatti Posts: 4,280 Member
    The deal is, women have to be abstinent to be 100% sure since there would be no recourse for failed birth control or bad decisions except having an unwanted pregnancy, giving the child up for adoption, or illegally seeking an abortion. I just don't know how realistic abstinence is, despite all that.
    Unfortunately, I do not think abstinence is realistic either. But if abortion were illegal, the majority of women would turn to an alternate choice.
  • FearAnLoathing
    FearAnLoathing Posts: 4,852 Member
    And if you drive a car there's a pretty good chance you will have a car accident at some point. Doesn't mean we say "Hey you were driving, you knew what could happen."
    Sure we can. If someone is driving and has a car accident, they can't say, "Hey....I didn't think I was going to have a car accident. I tried really hard not to have a car accident". Your point is valid........for my argument. You KNEW by driving there was a risk of a car accident. The only way to know 100% you won't have one is to not drive. So, if you drive, even though you don't want to have a car accident, you'll have consequences and be responsible for the outcome. Unless you can find a doctor that will "make it go away" for you. Wait, that last part didn't fit......

    Would if someone forces you by gun point into the car?
  • fbmandy55
    fbmandy55 Posts: 5,263 Member
    I just don't think women should be punished for becoming pregnant unexpectedly by being forced to endure unsafe processes, when safe ones are available.

    I know you are replying to macpatti so, my apologies but pregnancy is the outcome of sex. It's not a punishment, everyone knows that you get pregnant by having sex. If woman doesn't want to have a baby, she shouldn't be having sex. But because abortions are so readily available, I don't think women really care about that risk.

    When I got pregnant I was n the pill and using condoms

    I can relate, I was on the pill also when I got pregnant. But I knew that was a risk of sex, even on the pill and that abstinence is the only 100% way to not get pregnant.
  • FearAnLoathing
    FearAnLoathing Posts: 4,852 Member
    When I got pregnant I was n the pill and using condoms
    I was on the pill when I got pregnant with my oldest son. Everyone knows that the only foolproof form of birth control is abstinence, so anyone who is having sex and gets pregnant had some knowledge that it could happen.

    Not everybody chooses to have the sex that leads to pregnacy
  • VeganInTraining
    VeganInTraining Posts: 1,319 Member
    The deal is, women have to be abstinent to be 100% sure since there would be no recourse for failed birth control or bad decisions except having an unwanted pregnancy, giving the child up for adoption, or illegally seeking an abortion. I just don't know how realistic abstinence is, despite all that.
    Unfortunately, I do not think abstinence is realistic either. But if abortion were illegal, the majority of women would turn to an alternate choice.

    Agreed!
  • castadiva
    castadiva Posts: 2,016 Member
    When I got pregnant I was n the pill and using condoms
    I was on the pill when I got pregnant with my oldest son. Everyone knows that the only foolproof form of birth control is abstinence, so anyone who is having sex and gets pregnant had some knowledge that it could happen.

    Not everybody chooses to have the sex that leads to pregnacy

    There's that too. Are the passionate anti-abortionists here with Rick Santorum when he said that victims of rape who fall pregnant should "make the best of it"?
This discussion has been closed.