jacksonpt Member

Replies

  • I cannot emphasize that point enough.
  • Nothing speaks louder than how I look in the mirror or how I feel when I fail.
  • Disagree. OP - if you can give the required effort, then you're fine to workout. If you can't, then don't... walk instead. Or stretch. Or something. Just move... getting the muscles warmed up and loose is a good way to help them recover.
  • It's not specific to gels, but... Cals will help maintain energy. Electrolytes will help keep mineral levels balanced, which should help prevent cramps (though, I'm yet to see any significant evidence that cramps are caused by electrolyte imbalance). Regardless, it's pretty easy insurance. The other thing to consider is…
  • Great post. Most people will need both cals and electrolytes at some point during a long race/workout. How you get them doesn't really matter and is largely about personal preference. During runs, I much prefer gels vs anything I have to chew, but that's me. I can't imagine doing long course work with straight water. Not…
  • I've got this thing at the end of my right arm that's pretty handy. it's got 5 little arms, for lack of a better word, that I can bend into position that hold my phone really well. I have a similar one at the end of my left arm, but the one on my right arm just seems to work better. I've had it for as long as I can…
  • Running is WAAAAY cheaper than cycling.
  • Splitting hairs here, maybe... but I wouldn't say they aren't accurate. I'd say they aren't reliable. The number you get at the end of the session *could* be very accurate, but in most cases it probably won't be. So IMO, it's not a reliable way to estimate cals burned. If you still want to wear the HRM, then go for it.…
  • Exactly my point. It's become trendy on MFP to run around talking about how toning isn't a thing, as if someone who wanted to tone up needs to come up with a new goal... and that's not the case at all. Toning is a thing, and most of us who are adults and can have conversations like adults know what a person means when they…
  • If I lived somewhere flatter I would have had one a long time ago. Too many hills here though for anything more than riding around with my kids. One of my mtb is a SS... not quite the same, obviously, but it's pretty awesome. Just can't justify the cost for a SS/fixie road bike right now.
  • That's a good point that can easily get missed. In order to work your core, you have to work your core. A lot of the mentioned exercises can be done with relatively little to no core engagement. Be cognizant of your core and keeping it tight, stable, and engaged throughout the lift.
  • I think they are great for new runners, but once you know what you need from a shoe, it's not a big deal to skip the analysis, assuming nothing significant has changed with your gait, weight, mileage, etc. I will say that I'm part of the apparent minority who thinks gait analysis, for many people, are way over hyped. Go to…
  • it most certainly is a thing... it's a concept much like leaning out is a concept. While it's true that you can't tone up a muscle, you can most certainly tone up your body or your legs or similar. This whole "there's no such thing as toning" nonsense that has taken foothold in MFP, while well intentioned, is a lot of…
  • Similar to cell phone screen protectors? Didn't know they made such a thing, but I guess it doesn't surprise me.
  • Correct. The deficit will trump the routine in terms of muscle gains. Just use a basic tape measure and measure the circumference at certain body points. Record the numbers and watch for trends/progress over time.
  • Those 2 things contradict each other. Either you're losing or gaining, but not both, and certainly not in such a short period of time. As was mentioned earlier... how are you measuring the additional leg muscle? Are you taking regular measurements (arms, waist, thighs, etc)? What about progress pictures? But to your…
  • I was looking at the sapphire glass. If I went with the Fenix it would be to wear more regularly than just for training, in which case I'd want the sapphire. I've got a bunch of watches, and the good ones definitely hold up better to regular wear and tear. IMO, it does make a difference. Regardless, I've thought about this…
  • Good post... especially those first 2 sentences. I totally get the desire to be exact, but that's a losing battle in this arena. Be consistent in what you're doing, then get comfortable with being close, because that's as good as it gets.
  • Where are you getting the numbers from? I have no idea how MFP calculates calorie burns, but most other sources use some type of calculation based on a variety of factors. As such, calling it a crapshoot is probably an overstatement. It's more of an estimate, an estimate which could be very close for some, or very far off…
  • Depends on the workout, but most of my running right now is more about time than it is distance.
  • ^^ good post. Speaking very generally... I would say that 1lb per week is most ideal for most people under most circumstances. Emphasis on "most". 2lbs per week is the max that is considered healthy, but even that can be too much/fast for some people
  • If you're not experiencing pain or other use-related problems, then I wouldn't worry too much about it. A lot of people can walk into a major sporting goods store, try on a couple shoes, and walk out with a pair that are just fine for them. Not everyone *has* to go through a full on gait analysis. Keep an eye on pretty…
  • There are a few things that come into this conversation... First of all, yes. Real long term weight loss is as simple as CICO. There can be some trial and error at first figuring out what your CI and CO are and how they balance out, but ultimately it's just a matter of energy balance. Next, regarding the non-linear nature…
  • How the hell does shakeology make it into a thread where affordability is a requirement???
  • EAS makes a lower carb shake (thus higher relative protein) that also has some added vitamins. I keep some in the fridge at work as a backup. They taste reasonably OK and are pretty calorie friendly. I usually get them at Target, but they are listed on the walmart website, so maybe they'll have them in store, too. EAS…
  • That's pretty much where I'm at too. The 920 is more than enough function for me, but the Fenix is cooler, better looking, and more techy/gadgetish. But if I'm going to spend $600, I'd rather spend it on a power meter. I'll be calling my local running shop today to have them order a 920.
  • No, you certainly don't need them. Though a basic squat stand doesn't take up any more room than you'd need to overhead press, so I don't see room as being a limiting factor here. But to your question, there are several squat variations that are worth looking into if you don't want to do a traditional barbell squat.
  • Sounds like you've got the lifting part down. Now work on the macros/cals part of the equation. Then you just need lots and lots of patience and consistency.
Avatar