opus649 Member

A quick glance at my friends list should provide the answer to that question. :grumble:

Wow...... talk about twisting his words around. Are you really going to dispute that a revealing profile pic is going to attract more attention (wanted or otherwise) than a picture of a frisbee?? Haven't other people on this very thread already commented on the difference in volume of FR's depending on the amount of skin…

What were the top 3 leading causes of death among early humans?

Well played, sir. Well played.

To be fair, My Girl *was* a real tear-jerker...

The Kindle Fire with Amazon Prime is AWESOME. But, you should be aware that it only has a subset of the Android apps available to it, not the full Android marketplace. So if that's a consideration, you may want to go "full tablet" like the Asus Transformer that ZC mentioned.

:indifferent: She's not the one who looks bad in this thread....

:drinker:

Nice post. Want to be best friends?

You gotta change 'em out every 10,000 miles....

Completely disagree. Everyone is different. Some people have emotions that are pretty even.... they don't get too high, they don't get too low. Some people have personalities that take them on wild swings.....weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee... As someone who can easily get carried away by emotion, it's imperative that I take…

Cue the flame war in 3... 2... 1... :tongue:

:frown:

Love it :laugh:

Except that all of the scientific studies that have been done contradict you. It's much more likely that she's simply underestimating her caloric intake and overestimating her caloric needs.

A "calorie" is just a unit of measurement. To say a calorie of sugar is different than a calorie of butter is like saying a pound of muscle weighs less than a pound of fat. A calorie is a unit of heat. When people talk about counting calories, they are talking about counting the amount of heat necessary to process the food…

Fair enough :drinker:

I sure wouldn't mind looking like David Goggins.... http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-243-560--12944-0,00.html

Humans managed to get by for tens of thousands of years with their bare feet... as long as you ease yourself into it, your body was designed to run without shoes.

Reference: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124718227356220229.html

And rhesus monkeys...

What did cavemen do? Did they think, "well... I'm not really hungry.... but I don't want my basal metabolic rate to go down artificially because I didn't eat the appropriate number of calories today... guess I'll force down these rabbit testicles...." ?? As long as you're not malnourished and you don't have an eating…

Make that $0.04. Take your stuff.

http://www.amazon.com/Optimum-Nutrition-Standard-Double-Chocolate/dp/B000QSNYGI I love this stuff.... extreme milk chocolate... YUM

Congratulations!!!

Wow, I made the exact same mistake. I thought, "well heck, I ran for 20 minutes last week... I should be able to fly through five minutes now!" Uhhh..... no..... I should not. :embarassed: Slow and steady, slow and steady, slow and steady....

Believe in yourself.

Tell him about the twinkie...

You can do it!

I spent the last five minutes willing myself to continue.... I did *not* have the energy for a sprint after 20... I nearly collapsed in the grass!!! But I did make it :smile: