CATindeeHAT Member

I second this. Too often one spends a few hours learning about the role of insulin off Wikipedia and becomes the next new low-carb guru.

Yes, and just because my diet may not work for you doesn't mean I shouldn't be doing what I'm doing. It works for me and I'm losing weight. Everyone is different. End of story. If that's where you were headed....

Amen.

For the past couple months I have been eating 1200 NET calories and losing slowly. Then recently I started eating 1200 GROSS calories and I've lost 10 lbs in 5 weeks. Because I'm eating on the low-end of the calorie spectrum, I carb-cycle once every 3 days to prevent a stall via my metabolism from adapting to my low…

This is probably why you're struggling: http://youtu.be/JVjWPclrWVY http://youtu.be/HGunZpKLb5o

This is probably why you're struggling: http://youtu.be/JVjWPclrWVY http://youtu.be/HGunZpKLb5o

This is probably why you're struggling: http://youtu.be/JVjWPclrWVY http://youtu.be/HGunZpKLb5o

I'm glad you guys found the videos helpful!! As I'm sure you've noticed, there are LEAST 10+ posts here on this board asking, "What am I doing wrong? I'm not losing weight." etc. and it's my suspicion that this is the reason 99.999% of the time. It's amazing to think that just by licking the spoon after you scoop the…

This is most likely what you're doing wrong: http://youtu.be/JVjWPclrWVY http://youtu.be/HGunZpKLb5o

This is why, in my opinion, MFP's 1200 calorie/day baseline recommendation is NOT as outrageous as some make it out to be. It is also why, in my opinion, you are better off shaving off a hundred or two calories a day from your diet than spending your time worrying about going into 'starvation mode'. This ALSO demonstrates…

People don't make up scientific findings just to 'feel better'. What I'm referencing are REAL scientific findings. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/health/24aging.html?_r=0 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2094149/Why-love--moles-The-physical-flaws-GOOD-health.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11813378…

I have 30 on my face alone :/

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/health/24aging.html?_r=0 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2094149/Why-love--moles-The-physical-flaws-GOOD-health.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11813378 http://main.stylelist.com/2010/12/03/moles-age-slower-study/…

lol. You asked a question, you got an answer. I'd be pissed to.

Beauty marks are a sign that you'll live longer and age slower. People with over 100 beauty marks have significantly longer telomers (ends of their DNA) and age much better than those who don't.

Because I'm God.

1. This is a term used by the people of the southern United States particularly near the Gulf of Mexico to express to someone that they are an idiot without saying such harsh words. 2. "You are an idiot but I like you and care about you so I dont want to hurt your feelings." The south does everything different. They even…

Off subject. Reported. :drinker:

Burn in hell you heretic! It's a term of endearment.

Sorry. Bible says I can't do that either. .

That 41% under-five child mortality rate is a 50% improvement from 1960's (http://www.unicef.org/mdg/childmortality.html) and occurred due to distribution of vaccines (among other things).

You're correct. I apologize. Child mortality in developing nations as of 2012 is 41% world-wide. http://www.childinfo.org/files/Child_Mortality_Report_2012.pdf

http://www.unicef.org/media/media_fastfacts.html

It's the 11th commandment: 'Thou shalt not use thy brain or accept reality.' . .

.

.

Book Of Common Sense. 01:01 .

To understand it you have to use your brain and God doesn't like that... It says so in the Bible...

No, haven't you heard? It's a conspiracy.