Replies
-
Jenbit... Well said!
-
Again it goes back to the "exclusive conversation." If the conversation's been had & there's a mutual agreement, then I agree with you, people shouldn't continue to sleeping with multiple partners. But if the convo hasn't happened yet, or people aren't communicating what they consider acceptable, then you really can be mad…
-
Yes this is Dr. Robinson (not an MD though, a JD). :) Nice to talk to you. Let me translate "girl-ism code" for you (in case you may or may not know). Here's why it's considered "acceptable" for a woman to sleep with a man she cares very little for quickly, & initially deny sex to the man she does care for. Two words...…
-
I was responding to the the "exclusivity" dilemma
-
Ok I'm gonna put a "legal" spin on things. (However just as a disclaimer, I am NOT giving ACTUAL LEGAL ADVISE, I don't wanna get disbarred before I'm even licensed). In law, you can't be convicted of a crime that isn't on the books yet (that's called ex post facto). Meaning, if y'all didn't have the exclusive…
