I am a tramp.

13

Replies

  • bruintamer
    bruintamer Posts: 183 Member
    Waaa I typed out a long reply and the damn thing was eaten up.

    The guy and I haven't had any talk about exclusivity. I could care less if he's dating, sleeping, whatever with other chicks... not because I don't like him (I completely disagree with that statement btw), but because I believe up until that literal moment of the talk, it's fair game. It's not his business what I do. Granted, if he were to ask me "are you still dating other guys?" I would tell him. Also, if he were to ask me not to, if I liked him, I would. Simple. But he hasn't, nor have I asked him. I'm not even sure where we're heading. I'm still trying to figure out if I see him as relationship material. Yup, not rushing that part again!

    Also, I have read guys comments on THIS board talking about the same thing. They might not rush a chick who has potential relationship material in sleeping with her but they have no problem banging other chicks who aren't that special.

    I never told the guy I wanted to take things slow (besides the relationship stuff). I told him I preferred to have sex in an exclusive relationship. But last date, we were very physical. VERY. It just went that way. And instead of feeling guilty or bad or ashamed for being a human and wanting to because I like him, I decided to own it and call it as it was- a good time. There was no talk about expectations if we did more than kissing, nor has there been. And I'm perfectly content at this point.

    I have no problem with multi-dating. Apparently the majority of the peeps here, don't do it but I do and will continue to do so. As long as everyone is safe and good, no harm (in my eyes).

    You little tramp, you! LOL. J/k. My girl friends always say it's not cheating if it's not official.
  • La_Amazona
    La_Amazona Posts: 4,855 Member
    Waaa I typed out a long reply and the damn thing was eaten up.

    The guy and I haven't had any talk about exclusivity. I could care less if he's dating, sleeping, whatever with other chicks... not because I don't like him (I completely disagree with that statement btw), but because I believe up until that literal moment of the talk, it's fair game. It's not his business what I do. Granted, if he were to ask me "are you still dating other guys?" I would tell him. Also, if he were to ask me not to, if I liked him, I would. Simple. But he hasn't, nor have I asked him. I'm not even sure where we're heading. I'm still trying to figure out if I see him as relationship material. Yup, not rushing that part again!

    Also, I have read guys comments on THIS board talking about the same thing. They might not rush a chick who has potential relationship material in sleeping with her but they have no problem banging other chicks who aren't that special.

    I never told the guy I wanted to take things slow (besides the relationship stuff). I told him I preferred to have sex in an exclusive relationship. But last date, we were very physical. VERY. It just went that way. And instead of feeling guilty or bad or ashamed for being a human and wanting to because I like him, I decided to own it and call it as it was- a good time. There was no talk about expectations if we did more than kissing, nor has there been. And I'm perfectly content at this point.

    I have no problem with multi-dating. Apparently the majority of the peeps here, don't do it but I do and will continue to do so. As long as everyone is safe and good, no harm (in my eyes).

    You little tramp, you! LOL. J/k. My girl friends always say it's not cheating if it's not official.

    I like your friends lol. That's exactly how I feel.
  • Jennifer2387
    Jennifer2387 Posts: 957 Member
    "I have no problem with multi-dating. Apparently the majority of the peeps here, don't do it but I do and will continue to do so. As long as everyone is safe and good, no harm (in my eyes)."

    I am with you. I don't think it is as cut and dried as people say either..there are stages of a relationship and what you would do or not do during each of those stages.
  • jesusHchris
    jesusHchris Posts: 1,405 Member
    I agree that there is nothing wrong with dating multiple partners until you specifically and mutually agree with one of those partners to be exclusive. I don't ask questions and wouldn't want any details.

    I don't know that I have it in me to make that much effort, though - not with the professional and fitness commitments I currently have in my life. If I was a hot girl who was asked out on dates any time I went out in public, this might be different.
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    Waaa I typed out a long reply and the damn thing was eaten up.

    The guy and I haven't had any talk about exclusivity. I could care less if he's dating, sleeping, whatever with other chicks... not because I don't like him (I completely disagree with that statement btw), but because I believe up until that literal moment of the talk, it's fair game. It's not his business what I do. Granted, if he were to ask me "are you still dating other guys?" I would tell him. Also, if he were to ask me not to, if I liked him, I would. Simple. But he hasn't, nor have I asked him. I'm not even sure where we're heading. I'm still trying to figure out if I see him as relationship material. Yup, not rushing that part again!

    Also, I have read guys comments on THIS board talking about the same thing. They might not rush a chick who has potential relationship material in sleeping with her but they have no problem banging other chicks who aren't that special.

    I never told the guy I wanted to take things slow (besides the relationship stuff). I told him I preferred to have sex in an exclusive relationship. But last date, we were very physical. VERY. It just went that way. And instead of feeling guilty or bad or ashamed for being a human and wanting to because I like him, I decided to own it and call it as it was- a good time. There was no talk about expectations if we did more than kissing, nor has there been. And I'm perfectly content at this point.

    I have no problem with multi-dating. Apparently the majority of the peeps here, don't do it but I do and will continue to do so. As long as everyone is safe and good, no harm (in my eyes).

    You little tramp, you! LOL. J/k. My girl friends always say it's not cheating if it's not official.

    Easy to say ladies until the shoe is on the other foot huh. If you liked the guy and were emotionally invested in him then found out I get you wouldn't like it as much.
  • bruintamer
    bruintamer Posts: 183 Member
    Waaa I typed out a long reply and the damn thing was eaten up.

    The guy and I haven't had any talk about exclusivity. I could care less if he's dating, sleeping, whatever with other chicks... not because I don't like him (I completely disagree with that statement btw), but because I believe up until that literal moment of the talk, it's fair game. It's not his business what I do. Granted, if he were to ask me "are you still dating other guys?" I would tell him. Also, if he were to ask me not to, if I liked him, I would. Simple. But he hasn't, nor have I asked him. I'm not even sure where we're heading. I'm still trying to figure out if I see him as relationship material. Yup, not rushing that part again!

    Also, I have read guys comments on THIS board talking about the same thing. They might not rush a chick who has potential relationship material in sleeping with her but they have no problem banging other chicks who aren't that special.

    I never told the guy I wanted to take things slow (besides the relationship stuff). I told him I preferred to have sex in an exclusive relationship. But last date, we were very physical. VERY. It just went that way. And instead of feeling guilty or bad or ashamed for being a human and wanting to because I like him, I decided to own it and call it as it was- a good time. There was no talk about expectations if we did more than kissing, nor has there been. And I'm perfectly content at this point.

    I have no problem with multi-dating. Apparently the majority of the peeps here, don't do it but I do and will continue to do so. As long as everyone is safe and good, no harm (in my eyes).

    You little tramp, you! LOL. J/k. My girl friends always say it's not cheating if it's not official.

    Easy to say ladies until the shoe is on the other foot huh. If you liked the guy and were emotionally invested in him then found out I get you wouldn't like it as much.

    But the thing is...we don't go into that thinking or expecting the guy to be exclusive until told otherwise. And if the girl is still dating other people too then she really can't get upset to find out that he was seeing other people too.
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    Waaa I typed out a long reply and the damn thing was eaten up.

    The guy and I haven't had any talk about exclusivity. I could care less if he's dating, sleeping, whatever with other chicks... not because I don't like him (I completely disagree with that statement btw), but because I believe up until that literal moment of the talk, it's fair game. It's not his business what I do. Granted, if he were to ask me "are you still dating other guys?" I would tell him. Also, if he were to ask me not to, if I liked him, I would. Simple. But he hasn't, nor have I asked him. I'm not even sure where we're heading. I'm still trying to figure out if I see him as relationship material. Yup, not rushing that part again!

    Also, I have read guys comments on THIS board talking about the same thing. They might not rush a chick who has potential relationship material in sleeping with her but they have no problem banging other chicks who aren't that special.

    I never told the guy I wanted to take things slow (besides the relationship stuff). I told him I preferred to have sex in an exclusive relationship. But last date, we were very physical. VERY. It just went that way. And instead of feeling guilty or bad or ashamed for being a human and wanting to because I like him, I decided to own it and call it as it was- a good time. There was no talk about expectations if we did more than kissing, nor has there been. And I'm perfectly content at this point.

    I have no problem with multi-dating. Apparently the majority of the peeps here, don't do it but I do and will continue to do so. As long as everyone is safe and good, no harm (in my eyes).

    You little tramp, you! LOL. J/k. My girl friends always say it's not cheating if it's not official.

    Easy to say ladies until the shoe is on the other foot huh. If you liked the guy and were emotionally invested in him then found out I get you wouldn't like it as much.

    But the thing is...we don't go into that thinking or expecting the guy to be exclusive until told otherwise. And if the girl is still dating other people too then she really can't get upset to find out that he was seeing other people too.

    Yeah, but telling one guy you want to not have sex unless you're exclusive and then having sex with someone else... Seems a little backwards. I would rather date one guy at a time and have sex with the person that I want to have a relationship with before going out and finding a partner on the side.
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    I agree totally Kitsune. Its all good and well to go have fun, but in my book, if im dating someone, I concentrate on them, maybe its old fashioned but I wouldnt think its very gentlemen like to be dating someone, whilst they are possibly becoming emotionally invested in me and be sleeping with someone else at the same time... I wouldnt think much of the girl who did that to me either.

    If both parties are openly doing it to each other, thats fine, thats up to them to deal with it, but its all behind closed doors and one sided then I dont think thats cool at all.
  • bruintamer
    bruintamer Posts: 183 Member
    I agree totally Kitsune. Its all good and well to go have fun, but in my book, if im dating someone, I concentrate on them, maybe its old fashioned but I wouldnt think its very gentlemen like to be dating someone, whilst they are possibly becoming emotionally invested in me and be sleeping with someone else at the same time... I wouldnt think much of the girl who did that to me either.

    If both parties are openly doing it to each other, thats fine, thats up to them to deal with it, but its all behind closed doors and one sided then I dont think thats cool at all.

    Not saying to go hoing around or keep it secret....but if you didn't ask, she didn't tell. Just saying, in this day and age, never assume exclusivity. And (totally not saying this is how or what Amazona and I do) isn't telling one guy you're waiting to be exclusive to have sex and then sleeping with another on the side better than sleeping with them both? :laugh:
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: I guess so!

    Please remind me why im with you again :tongue: :flowerforyou:
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    I agree totally Kitsune. Its all good and well to go have fun, but in my book, if im dating someone, I concentrate on them, maybe its old fashioned but I wouldnt think its very gentlemen like to be dating someone, whilst they are possibly becoming emotionally invested in me and be sleeping with someone else at the same time... I wouldnt think much of the girl who did that to me either.

    If both parties are openly doing it to each other, thats fine, thats up to them to deal with it, but its all behind closed doors and one sided then I dont think thats cool at all.

    Not saying to go hoing around or keep it secret....but if you didn't ask, she didn't tell. Just saying, in this day and age, never assume exclusivity. And (totally not saying this is how or what Amazona and I do) isn't telling one guy you're waiting to be exclusive to have sex and then sleeping with another on the side better than sleeping with them both? :laugh:

    No one is assuming exclusivity, Amazona was just originally saying that she was telling the guy no until they're exclusive - which is totally fine until you learn that there are other people who are getting the goods and aren't held to the same standards. Not saying anyone is a bad person, I just don't understand the logic.
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    I agree totally Kitsune. Its all good and well to go have fun, but in my book, if im dating someone, I concentrate on them, maybe its old fashioned but I wouldnt think its very gentlemen like to be dating someone, whilst they are possibly becoming emotionally invested in me and be sleeping with someone else at the same time... I wouldnt think much of the girl who did that to me either.

    If both parties are openly doing it to each other, thats fine, thats up to them to deal with it, but its all behind closed doors and one sided then I dont think thats cool at all.

    Not saying to go hoing around or keep it secret....but if you didn't ask, she didn't tell. Just saying, in this day and age, never assume exclusivity. And (totally not saying this is how or what Amazona and I do) isn't telling one guy you're waiting to be exclusive to have sex and then sleeping with another on the side better than sleeping with them both? :laugh:

    No one is assuming exclusivity, Amazona was just originally saying that she was telling the guy no until they're exclusive - which is totally fine until you learn that there are other people who are getting the goods and aren't held to the same standards. Not saying anyone is a bad person, I just don't understand the logic.

    Yeah thats right, I really dont understand that either. It's your twirly time, do what you want with it, but keep in mind, if it ever comes up later in the relationship, assuming you make it that far, dont expect him to just lay down and take it. No pun intended :laugh:
  • Ok I'm gonna put a "legal" spin on things. (However just as a disclaimer, I am NOT giving ACTUAL LEGAL ADVISE, I don't wanna get disbarred before I'm even licensed). In law, you can't be convicted of a crime that isn't on the books yet (that's called ex post facto). Meaning, if y'all didn't have the exclusive talk/understanding then you can't be mad when someone you're dating is sleeping with other people. When you assume you make an *kitten* out of "you" & "me."

    If you recently start dating new people and you know that you're the type of person that wants things exclusive from the get-go, then open your mouth and say something. If your significant other doesn't want to commit as soon as you, then grow a pair and drop them. Don't settle for something that equates to something beyond a mutual compromise.

    Communication is EVERYTHING in a good relationship. If you wanna know something ask. Otherwise if you remain "silent" its your own bad, because omissions aren't necessarily lies. However, keep in mind that you should treat others as you wanna be treated. Don't by a hypocrite.

    Moral of the story - If you remain silent, no one can hear you. Communicate from the start.
  • flimflamfloz
    flimflamfloz Posts: 1,980 Member
    No one is assuming exclusivity, Amazona was just originally saying that she was telling the guy no until they're exclusive - which is totally fine until you learn that there are other people who are getting the goods and aren't held to the same standards. Not saying anyone is a bad person, I just don't understand the logic.
    That's women's logic, which is as follow:
    - The guy A who sleeps with the girl is not a very important guy (the guy with who the girls can't imagine a LTR), so it doesn't matter to actually sleep with him. Throw-away type of guy.
    - The guy B who doesn't sleep with the girl is a much more important guy (the guy with who the girls will imagine a LTR), so let's take our time with him. Investment type of guy.

    Since I've approached women as guy A by being a complete idiot, I've dipped my biscuit a lot more.
    Since men want to dip their biscuit primarily, they should approach women as guy A.

    On a side note, this approach is (ironically) valid for LTRs since if you approach girls as guy A, dip your biscuit, make them realise you're actually guy B too and not just a complete moron ("I never thought of him that way...") *snap* they're into you!

    Guy B is screwed, guy A screws.
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    Ok I'm gonna put a "legal" spin on things. (However just as a disclaimer, I am NOT giving ACTUAL LEGAL ADVISE, I don't wanna get disbarred before I'm even licensed). In law, you can't be convicted of a crime that isn't on the books yet (that's called ex post facto). Meaning, if y'all didn't have the exclusive talk/understanding then you can't be mad when someone you're dating is sleeping with other people. When you assume you make an *kitten* out of "you" & "me."

    If you recently start dating new people and you know that you're the type of person that wants things exclusive from the get-go, then open your mouth and say something. If your significant other doesn't want to commit as soon as you, then grow a pair and drop them. Don't settle for something that equates to something beyond a mutual compromise.

    Communication is EVERYTHING in a good relationship. If you wanna know something ask. Otherwise if you remain "silent" its your own bad, because omissions aren't necessarily lies. However, keep in mind that you should treat others as you wanna be treated. Don't by a hypocrite.

    Moral of the story - If you remain silent, no one can hear you. Communicate from the start.

    The hell are you talking bout?
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    No one is assuming exclusivity, Amazona was just originally saying that she was telling the guy no until they're exclusive - which is totally fine until you learn that there are other people who are getting the goods and aren't held to the same standards. Not saying anyone is a bad person, I just don't understand the logic.
    That's women's logic, which is as follow:
    - The guy A who sleeps with the girl is not a very important guy (the guy with who the girls can't imagine a LTR), so it doesn't matter to actually sleep with him. Throw-away type of guy.
    - The guy B who doesn't sleep with the girl is a much more important guy (the guy with who the girls will imagine a LTR), so let's take our time with him. Investment type of guy.

    Since I've approached women as guy A by being a complete idiot, I've dipped my biscuit a lot more.
    Since men want to dip their biscuit primarily, they should approach women as guy A.

    On a side note, this approach is (ironically) valid for LTRs since if you approach girls as guy A, dip your biscuit, make them realise you're actually guy B too and not just a complete moron ("I never thought of him that way...") *snap* they're into you!

    Guy B is screwed, guy A screws.

    I would rather sleep with the guy I have an investment in. The purpose of having someone you aren't invested in only exists if there's no one worth being invested in, right? Is that backwards?
  • I was responding to the the "exclusivity" dilemma
  • flimflamfloz
    flimflamfloz Posts: 1,980 Member
    I would rather sleep with the guy I have an investment in. The purpose of having someone you aren't invested in only exists if there's no one worth being invested in, right? Is that backwards?
    Investment is... investment. So you invest for the future, not for now - and take your time about it to make sure it is the right investment. But you still need a plumber to check your pipes right now.

    In one case you lose a potentially great guy (investment) so you're treading carefully, in the other case there is nothing to lose with the other guy so you're moving fast (who cares about what happens anyway!).
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    I was responding to the the "exclusivity" dilemma
    "

    Ms Robinson is that you lol?

    Yeah I get what you are saying, Ms Jones said the same thing.

    I think the point is and where this has stemmed from is that, she didnt want to give the goodies up to this other guy cause she 'likes hims' apparently, but then does so to some randoms at the same time. Do you think he would like that? I dont.

    Totally agree with you, where you said that you should treat others how you wanna be treated. I guess some peoples morals are different to others.
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    I would rather sleep with the guy I have an investment in. The purpose of having someone you aren't invested in only exists if there's no one worth being invested in, right? Is that backwards?
    Investment is... investment. So you invest for the future, not for now - and take your time about it to make sure it is the right investment. But you still need a plumber to check your pipes right now.

    In one case you lose a potentially great guy (investment) so you're treading carefully, in the other case there is nothing to lose with the other guy so you're moving fast (who cares about what happens anyway!).

    To bad if you pass on a nasty little deposit onto your investment but :laugh: :laugh:
  • christine24t
    christine24t Posts: 6,063 Member
    No one is assuming exclusivity, Amazona was just originally saying that she was telling the guy no until they're exclusive - which is totally fine until you learn that there are other people who are getting the goods and aren't held to the same standards. Not saying anyone is a bad person, I just don't understand the logic.

    I don't get it either...and I'm not saying this directly to Amazona, or questioning her at all. This just brings up an interesting question/thought. If I was a guy, I would rather a girl fooled around with me from the beginning if she wants to fool around, instead of waiting to fool around with me because she wants to impress me/set a standard for the relationship, but fools around on the side with another guy.

    I am not a believer in having sex on the first date, or even in the beginning months of a relationship - it's not for me, and I don't think it helps a relationship. I can't believe saying this, but if you guys and gals here want to have sex that early with a partner, why not? It doesn't work for me, but it might work for you. I think it's better to have sex with one guy than to go and have sex/fool around with another guy on the side because you're worried about what guy A thinks.
  • pa_jorg
    pa_jorg Posts: 4,404 Member
    That's women's logic, which is as follow:
    - The guy A who sleeps with the girl is not a very important guy (the guy with who the girls can't imagine a LTR), so it doesn't matter to actually sleep with him. Throw-away type of guy.
    - The guy B who doesn't sleep with the girl is a much more important guy (the guy with who the girls will imagine a LTR), so let's take our time with him. Investment type of guy.

    Since I've approached women as guy A by being a complete idiot, I've dipped my biscuit a lot more.
    Since men want to dip their biscuit primarily, they should approach women as guy A.

    On a side note, this approach is (ironically) valid for LTRs since if you approach girls as guy A, dip your biscuit, make them realise you're actually guy B too and not just a complete moron ("I never thought of him that way...") *snap* they're into you!

    Guy B is screwed, guy A screws.

    Thank you for introducing the phrase "dip your biscuit" to the group! :laugh::laugh:

    I think another term we often use for Guy A is a Friend With Benefits...someone easy and fun...no strings. Aside from what you mentioned, I think A can turn into B due to the dopamine (or 'love') chemicals released in a woman's brain after sex.

    Edit to add: I understand how you are explaining the difference, but the logic of holding different people to different standards still doesn't make much sense to me either.
  • Yes this is Dr. Robinson (not an MD though, a JD). :) Nice to talk to you.

    Let me translate "girl-ism code" for you (in case you may or may not know). Here's why it's considered "acceptable" for a woman to sleep with a man she cares very little for quickly, & initially deny sex to the man she does care for. Two words... DOUBLE STANDARD.

    Woman are labelled as being loose, *kitten*, easy, etc., if they sleep with a man "too soon." While some women do care about men they think could be LTRs & want to sleep with them right away (1st / 2nd date), if they do, most men won't take them seriously. It's the old adage "you can't turn a hoe into a housewife." Women's virtue is held to harsher standard than men's. Sad but true.

    Getting to the point, when a woman denies the man she really cares for sex, it's because she wants him to respect her, to take her serious. She doesn't wanna be punished by the double standard if she gives it up too soon (even if she really wants to). Whereas with a guy she's not serious about, she could care less what he thinks of her. So there's no double standard punishment. The double standard's irrelevant at that point.

    I know it seem counter intuitive, but that's the reality. Of course exceptions do exist, but that's the general rule of thumb.
  • christine24t
    christine24t Posts: 6,063 Member
    Getting to the point, when a woman denies the man she really cares for sex, it's because she wants him to respect her, to take her serious. She doesn't wanna be punished by the double standard if she gives it up too soon (even if she really wants to). Whereas with a guy she's not serious about, she could care less what he thinks of her. So there's no double standard punishment. The double standard's irrelevant at that point.

    I know it seem counter intuitive, but that's the reality. Of course exceptions do exist, but that's the general rule of thumb.

    I agree with that. But wouldn't a guy rather have a girl sleep with him early than find out she was having sex with another guy to get that need of her filled while getting the emotional need filled with him??

    Men?
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    Yes this is Dr. Robinson (not an MD though, a JD). :) Nice to talk to you.

    Let me translate "girl-ism code" for you (in case you may or may not know). Here's why it's considered "acceptable" for a woman to sleep with a man she cares very little for quickly, & initially deny sex to the man she does care for. Two words... DOUBLE STANDARD.

    Woman are labelled as being loose, *kitten*, easy, etc., if they sleep with a man "too soon." While some women do care about men they think could be LTRs & want to sleep with them right away (1st / 2nd date), if they do, most men won't take them seriously. It's the old adage "you can't turn a hoe into a housewife." Women's virtue is held to harsher standard than men's. Sad but true.

    Getting to the point, when a woman denies the man she really cares for sex, it's because she wants him to respect her, to take her serious. She doesn't wanna be punished by the double standard if she gives it up too soon (even if she really wants to). Whereas with a guy she's not serious about, she could care less what he thinks of her. So there's no double standard punishment. The double standard's irrelevant at that point.

    I know it seem counter intuitive, but that's the reality. Of course exceptions do exist, but that's the general rule of thumb.

    Hey whats happening :smile:

    Yeah but I get all that totally. Im a male so no news for me haha. What im getting at is that this is happening all at the same time, dating one guy and not fooling around much, then fooling around a lot with some other randoms simultaneously! Thats whats not cool about it to me.
  • TheKitsune6
    TheKitsune6 Posts: 5,798 Member
    If a guy doesn't want to be in a relationship with me because I had sex with him, then he's an idiot and I'll move on to someone that's more rational and less moronic. If we're spending time together and getting to know each other and my personality is overshadowed by "We had awesome sex, that means I can't introduce her to my mother" then thank goodness Iearned what an idiot you were before I got too emotionally invested. Thanks for the time saver!
  • Again it goes back to the "exclusive conversation." If the conversation's been had & there's a mutual agreement, then I agree with you, people shouldn't continue to sleeping with multiple partners. But if the convo hasn't happened yet, or people aren't communicating what they consider acceptable, then you really can be mad at the person who's a sex multiplex. It all boils down to communication.

    Relationships are gray areas. People have to verbalize what they want and how they feel
  • Danielle_2013
    Danielle_2013 Posts: 806 Member
    I can multi-chat, multi-flirt, multi-date and maybe multi-kiss...but I can't multi-sex. Just can't do it. I only seem to really, really like one person at a time. Too emotional and too forgetful...I would so call out the wrong name..
  • Natx83
    Natx83 Posts: 1,298 Member
    Again it goes back to the "exclusive conversation." If the conversation's been had & there's a mutual agreement, then I agree with you, people shouldn't continue to sleeping with multiple partners. But if the convo hasn't happened yet, or people aren't communicating what they consider acceptable, then you really can be mad at the person who's a sex multiplex. It all boils down to communication.

    Relationships are gray areas. People have to verbalize what they want and how they feel

    Also just to touch on the double standards, I dont think its any worse for a girl to sleep around than a guy. It's just I dont have to worry about where a guys been casue I dont have to sleep with him LOL. But where it becomes an issue, is when someone who I want to get down and dirty with has just recently, like possibly yesterday, been down and dirty with someone else, without me knowing then that would be cause for concern.

    If anyones going to "hoe" it up, least have the deceny to tell them your doing so, let them make their own mind up.
  • AnnaPixie
    AnnaPixie Posts: 7,439 Member
    Getting to the point, when a woman denies the man she really cares for sex, it's because she wants him to respect her, to take her serious. She doesn't wanna be punished by the double standard if she gives it up too soon (even if she really wants to). Whereas with a guy she's not serious about, she could care less what he thinks of her. So there's no double standard punishment. The double standard's irrelevant at that point.

    I know it seem counter intuitive, but that's the reality. Of course exceptions do exist, but that's the general rule of thumb.

    Oh, I'm sure he'd REALLY respect her if he found out she was shagging someone else!!! :noway:

    And this is 'acceptable' in America is it??

    Wow!!

    I'd say it's blatantly dishonest!!! Who on earth is this 'moralistic' woman trying to kid??? Herself or the guy she's trying to 'impress'?? No wonder divorce rates are so high if you're entering into a relationship on that premise............Jeez!! :huh: