williamtudorkay

Replies

  • Thanks for the reply. I would agree with you but the final calorie count is about half of what other internet based calorie counters 130 compared to 260 is a huge difference and would be much closer if it didn't count backwards!
  • Hi, Did you figure out why the calorie counts were so low? I think it is because it uses a calculation based on distance as its primary calculation factor and mostly ignores heart beat (although it should never be as low as your post said). When I commute to work mine reaches about 70kcal then I slow down and it actually…
Avatar