iballin

you guys relies Dr Jacob Wilson just did a very controlled proper study on ketogenic vs carbohydrate in trained lifters, ketogenic side lost 4x as much fat while gaining muscle carbohydrate gained abit more muscle ( which may just be glycogen/intramuscular water) since ultra sound measuring would pick that up as size, he…

people overblow this thyroid ****, there is studies that show the max it can slow down metabolic rate is 15% on a 1500 calorie maintenance that 150 calories that you dont burn that you should be... if its so bad you cant get out of bed, then thats another problem, but to claim the laws of thermodynamics change being hypo…

it is an excuse, it doesn't break the first laws of thermodynamics and if your not feeling symptoms then its not causing a huge metabolic difference a couple hundred calories at most, if your energy is so shot that you goto the doc and he says your thyroid is super slow then ya take the meds, but the weight gain thing is…

lol at people blaming under active thyroids. study's are showing that only amounts to an extra 10 lbs on a person, in which they can still lose if they adjust there calories properly, your body cant hold on to bodyfat without the food to feed it.. under active thyroid will slow metabolism and require abit more of a deficit…

it is all about a deficit, but if someone is insulin resistant and lets say they lose weight at 1500 cals. on a keto diet.. well if they eat 1500 cals of straight carbs believe me, it will not be the exact same weight loss if any with the exact same calories... science does back that insulin resistance will turn carbs to…

you relies thats an amazing amount of progress... not slow at all =/ ... just goes to show hypothyroidism is to an extent an excuse... its not possible to change the laws of thermodynamics..yes it slows metabolism.. but if your not losing weight at a calorie number,, you need to try dropping it ever so slightly, yes to…

why do people think if you have hypothyroidism you cant lose weight.. thats so far from the truth.. its only responsible for an extra maybe 300-500 cal difference a day.. your thyroid even untreated cannot change the laws of thermodynamics... you guys make it sound like your body can sit at a stand still, not use food for…

at the rate your saying that means your tdee was 3000, 2 lbs a week is 1000 calories a day, so at 2000 calories, your tdee was 3000 not much of a difference from 2700 , and lets not forget certain ppl are going to have abit better metabolic rates, so to say 2700 is way to low is stretching, but i se where your coming from…

its not unlikely because i have no medical issues and my TDEE with lifting weights 3-4x a week is around 2700, people undershoot there bodyfat percent and think they have a little less then they do , but 170 pounds of lean body mass is a very muscular 5,8 male.. so to say 330 at 50-55 percent body fat would need 3500 to…

2700 seems accurate for a 50% bodyfat 5,8 male, imo, every calculator that uses bodyfat percent is saying the same. and by exercise i meant lifting weights , not cardio, so 2700 no cardio seems right to maintain imo, ppl dont relies when theyre obese there generally always gaining weight weather its slowed down and they…

thank you, to the posted above you also, i haven't made it yet. but i feel like making some with skim milk and maybe scrape the butter then it'll be a decent bodybuilding carb meal , yum, loved scalloped potatoes growing up heh thanks guys

never said fat made you fat... excess calories , or going over your macros make you gain fat.. and i still like to know because i count macros , going unlimited fat per day is retarded.. why is it everytime someone asks about fat content in something people assume the person is scared of fat.. perhaps they count macros rofl

naw not really in a lean person though, 72 hours equals Catabolic ie loss of non-fatty tissue(muscle). wasent really talking about fasting per say, just wondering how its possible for someone to have deficit greater then there maintenance and i found out how, and its obvious.. lol silly me, it would entail cardio, and…

how does this make sense,,, if a 330 lb obese person is carrying 150 lbs of body fat , then 150 x 31 = 4650 . well that doesn't make sense because a 330 persons maintenance calories are less then that if not close to the same, so an obese person can eat nothing and lose 0 muscle while starving away?? interesting non the…

thing is he/she should be still losing weight... is that to big of a deficit ? possibly.. recent studys have concluded that every pound of fat you have can burn 31 cals, so the more over weight someone is the more of a deficit theyre aloud to have... because your body isnt going to tap into muscle tissue if you have 40…

Actually an obese person in a deficit can definitely build muscle , because a deficit to maintain a bunch of fat is different then a deficit to maintain muscle which people never understand, you take a an obese person with minimal muscle and 100 pounds of fat, and say it takes 4000 calories to maintain that fat, well it…

its actually mostly labels rounding calories up or down thats the problem, not so much invalid entries by people, I just went threw my cupboards and fridge and rarely anything adds up macro wise, it seems food labels are actually accurate with macros, but not calories, so your better off doing the math based off their…