LCHF for "Dummies"
deansdad101
Posts: 644 Member
Sorry about the "dummies" crack but if it got your attention and you can get past the implications......
Anyway, stumbled across a name I wasn't familiar with thanks to an indirect link in a GaleHawkins post where he referenced some historical data charts and graphs (thanks GH).
One of the charts used the name Skaldeman to identify one result and not being familiar with the term I hit up the googlemachine.
Turns out he's a Swedish (I think) guy, not an MD, but "just" a guy who had tried every diet known to man and finally, in a last ditch effort, went against everything his doc advised and went LCHF. From a starting weight >300# obese, pre T2D, and with the highest blood pressure ever measured by the doc who advised him he had "6 months to live" - he lost >150#'s, improved ALL his markers and is still alive and kicking.
He started LCHF to lose weight but quickly realized that the "real" benefits were health related and, in his case at least, truly a matter of "life and death".
He truly was a "pioneer" in the LCHF movement, particularly in what is known as the Scandinavian Diet which is basically LCHF but remained relatively unknown outside of Scandinavia since much of it was never translated to English.
I've been unable to find much on the interwebs that is in English although his book was finally translated and is now available on kindle.
I'm only about half way through it but so far VERY impressed - not because there's much "new" from what is available elsewhere, EXCEPT that he's presenting the info in a way that is truly "easy" and "understandable" for those that don't wish to become entangled in all the science "jargon".
Not only does he provide a wealth of simple to follow meal recipes but perhaps even more importantly for those unwilling or unable to deal with all the "math" involved in calculating macro ratios and whether total "cals-in" matters or not, his method really does put it at an easy to understand, and implement level. And all with very "basic" (as in 5th grade) "math".
In a nutshell he deals ONLY with fat, carbs, and protein levels in grams (weight) with NO need to convert to cals and with info that is available directly on the nutrition labels.
The ONLY "math" involved is adding protein and fat grams (from the label) dividing fat grams by the sum to arrive at what he calls the "fat burning ratio".
So, if the item has 100g fat, 80g protein, and 20g carbs (just for example) the calculation would be:
100g F / (80g P + 20g C)
100/100 = 1.0
Anything above 1.0 is "good",
and HIGHER is BETTER (so 1.25 "better", 1.5 even "more better")
He then advises that one assigns themselves to one of three "groups" or levels depending on their current circumstances and goals. Each "group" being successively more stringent and requiring a higher "fat burning quotient".
As one progresses toward their goals (weight wise) they "may" elect to move down the ladder to the next (less stringent) group.
There are specific diet (meal) recipes for each group as well as a number of "general" ideas for things like sauces and gravies.
The (free) kindle "preview" is available here;
tinyurl.com/mho3ssc
and the ebook is less than $10 bucks.
If you do nothing else I can't urge you strongly enough to at least read the preview and decide for yourself but I really do believe it's a worthwhile purchase for pretty much anyone interested in LCHF and the only "dummies" would be those that don't at least take a look.
Enjoy
Anyway, stumbled across a name I wasn't familiar with thanks to an indirect link in a GaleHawkins post where he referenced some historical data charts and graphs (thanks GH).
One of the charts used the name Skaldeman to identify one result and not being familiar with the term I hit up the googlemachine.
Turns out he's a Swedish (I think) guy, not an MD, but "just" a guy who had tried every diet known to man and finally, in a last ditch effort, went against everything his doc advised and went LCHF. From a starting weight >300# obese, pre T2D, and with the highest blood pressure ever measured by the doc who advised him he had "6 months to live" - he lost >150#'s, improved ALL his markers and is still alive and kicking.
He started LCHF to lose weight but quickly realized that the "real" benefits were health related and, in his case at least, truly a matter of "life and death".
He truly was a "pioneer" in the LCHF movement, particularly in what is known as the Scandinavian Diet which is basically LCHF but remained relatively unknown outside of Scandinavia since much of it was never translated to English.
I've been unable to find much on the interwebs that is in English although his book was finally translated and is now available on kindle.
I'm only about half way through it but so far VERY impressed - not because there's much "new" from what is available elsewhere, EXCEPT that he's presenting the info in a way that is truly "easy" and "understandable" for those that don't wish to become entangled in all the science "jargon".
Not only does he provide a wealth of simple to follow meal recipes but perhaps even more importantly for those unwilling or unable to deal with all the "math" involved in calculating macro ratios and whether total "cals-in" matters or not, his method really does put it at an easy to understand, and implement level. And all with very "basic" (as in 5th grade) "math".
In a nutshell he deals ONLY with fat, carbs, and protein levels in grams (weight) with NO need to convert to cals and with info that is available directly on the nutrition labels.
The ONLY "math" involved is adding protein and fat grams (from the label) dividing fat grams by the sum to arrive at what he calls the "fat burning ratio".
So, if the item has 100g fat, 80g protein, and 20g carbs (just for example) the calculation would be:
100g F / (80g P + 20g C)
100/100 = 1.0
Anything above 1.0 is "good",
and HIGHER is BETTER (so 1.25 "better", 1.5 even "more better")
He then advises that one assigns themselves to one of three "groups" or levels depending on their current circumstances and goals. Each "group" being successively more stringent and requiring a higher "fat burning quotient".
As one progresses toward their goals (weight wise) they "may" elect to move down the ladder to the next (less stringent) group.
There are specific diet (meal) recipes for each group as well as a number of "general" ideas for things like sauces and gravies.
The (free) kindle "preview" is available here;
tinyurl.com/mho3ssc
and the ebook is less than $10 bucks.
If you do nothing else I can't urge you strongly enough to at least read the preview and decide for yourself but I really do believe it's a worthwhile purchase for pretty much anyone interested in LCHF and the only "dummies" would be those that don't at least take a look.
Enjoy
6
Replies
-
SO, if I find other calculations work for me why would I need this? Curiosity...0
-
Cindy;SO, if I find other calculations work for me why would I need this? Curiosity...
Short answer.....you wouldn't ("need this"),
although you "might" still find it interesting.
I guess I wasn't able to convey my intent that it's primarily meant for those who have "issues" with "other calculations" and for whom they don't "work" - sorry, my bad.
1 -
It's interesting. It would make many of my cheeses bad (8g fat / (8g protein + trace-g carb) ... is less than 1. Of course, it's probably close enough to 1 for most purposes. That said, cheese is probably one of my weaknesses and one way to stop weight loss for me. Not that I worry too much about it since I am only trying to maintain these days.0
-
Thank you Deansdad101 for the good review and urge to have a look see. I just bought the book and I will start reading it tonight. LOVE the kindle for the instant gratification. It has been years since I have read Atkins and I am sure there is a lot I have forgotten and maybe a new perspective is a good thing.
Adding I am clueless with macros. All new since I was LCHF before. So for me this might be really good.
Chris0 -
I have not gone wrong with http://keto-calculator.ankerl.com/ That is why I asked. I know different strokes for different folks...just wondering if it was anything new and fantabulous!3
-
Frob;It's interesting. It would make many of my cheeses bad (8g fat / (8g protein + trace-g carb) ... is less than 1. Of course, it's probably close enough to 1 for most purposes. That said, cheese is probably one of my weaknesses and one way to stop weight loss for me. Not that I worry too much about it since I am only trying to maintain these days.
Not necessarily.
Cheeses are a "weakness" of ours as well and we consume them almost daily in one form or another.
We're "lucky" though in that they don't seem to impede weight loss (although to be honest, never really tried eliminating to see if it would have an effect).
In any case, I don't think it's in the preview, but further on in the book he incorporates cheese in a number of recipes including sauces and in combo with ground meats (which we have done for years).
The sauces and gravy sections alone are worth the price of admission (IMO).
0 -
Chris;shadesofidaho wrote: »Thank you Deansdad101 for the good review and urge to have a look see. I just bought the book and I will start reading it tonight. LOVE the kindle for the instant gratification. It has been years since I have read Atkins and I am sure there is a lot I have forgotten and maybe a new perspective is a good thing.
Adding I am clueless with macros. All new since I was LCHF before. So for me this might be really good.
Chris
You are more than welcome.
Even "A" has changed over the years and you are correct that LCHF isn't the same - they do have much in common but differences as well.
His approach to macros makes it much easier to both "calculate" and to "comprehend" and provides an easy to understand explanation of the "why" it matters.
I think (and hope) you will, enjoy it.
As I said in another post, just the meal/recipe suggestions are worth it for me.
One additional point that has become clear the further I get into it, especially for those in the US, is that some of the references will be somewhat "foreign" to us.
The units of measurement (metric) of course since we've only been "converting" to (or at least "learning") that system since about 1974 if I remember correctly <vbg>, but he has made the conversions for many of them.
The other thing is a number of terms that are familiar to those on the other side of the pond probably are not here.
Who knew that creme fraiche didn't contain strawberries, that minced meat = ground beef/pork, or that stinging nettles are actually one of the most nutrient rich "greens" one can eat!
The googlemachine is your friend though and solves many "riddles".
1 -
Hey DD,
Thanks for letting us know about the book.
Quick question - Do the sauce and gravy recipes use sweeteners?
Thanks.
0 -
There is also a book containing just his recipes:
amazon.com/The-Low-Carb-High-Cookbook/dp/162087783X
0 -
Saj;There is also a book containing just his recipes:
amazon.com/The-Low-Carb-High-Cookbook/dp/162087783X
Looks like that's only available in hardcover and about twice the price but for those who want hardcover it'll work (no more room on our bookshelves for more cookbooks <g>).
It's weird though since the preview says "this is preview of the kindle version....", but when you click on the kindle version it goes to a dead link so......
The summary says "contains 100 recipes" and while I haven't counted the number in the other one it seems like at least 100 to me. Might be different ones, not sure and probably can't tell without buying them both.
My "guess" would be you get most, if not all in the ebook.
As far as your question about sweeteners, if by that you mean artificials (SA's), he's not big on them and I only recall one mention in one recipe so far. Stevia, I think, so generally speaking, no.
Lots of butter, cream, cheeses, eggs (or just yolks), in the sauces and pan drippings, cream, etc in the gravies.
edit; Take a look at the "reviews" for the hardcover if you haven't already. One big difference is the pictures which a couple have described as "beautiful" and "more like a coffee table book" if that appeals to you.
One comment about "lots of potatoes and starches" which definitely isn't true in the one I have and sounds like a crackpot.
I think I'd try the ebook first and if the hardcover appeals to you, maybe take a look at one in a bookstore before buying.
0 -
Thank you for all the information. If it appears that most of the recipes are included in the original book then that would be the preferred option both for convenience and the additional information.
I asked about the SA's because I don't like the taste of them and I'm wary about using them in family recipes as my kids can have adverse reactions to flavourings and preservatives so I don't like to take the chance of making them ill. That does have it's positives though. We've been avoiding processed foods for so many years that I didn't have to give them up.
0 -
Chris;shadesofidaho wrote: »Thank you Deansdad101 for the good review and urge to have a look see. I just bought the book and I will start reading it tonight. LOVE the kindle for the instant gratification. It has been years since I have read Atkins and I am sure there is a lot I have forgotten and maybe a new perspective is a good thing.
Adding I am clueless with macros. All new since I was LCHF before. So for me this might be really good.
Chris
If you (or anyone else who reads the book) would take a few minutes after you read it and post your impressions, I'd appreciate it and it might help others decide if it's "right" for them or not.
Positive or negative, it matters not (I have no vested interested and I'm certainly not "bias-free") - plus I'm pretty thick-skinned so no worries there <g>.
Thanks in advance.
0 -
Deansdad, I am only 12% through the book. I have chores to deal with but hope to get some more reading in later today. Anxious to get the the recipes because we might be making a trip to town and always good to stock up.
And just as I am typing this my hubby found the post driver I have been looking for for 2 days. PHEW Now I have more chores finishing up the fence I was repairing. If the snow permits.
Catch you on the flip side of this day.
Chris0 -
Well the day changed. The road was cleared so off to town to get more fencing but could not stop at grocery. Long load small parking lot.
Deansdad. If you could help me knock this into my head. As simple as it should be it is confusing me. My brain feels on overload.
I think my Food is visible to all. I will check. Yesterday I just ran a total on my foods to keep it simple. My Fats were 72 and my carbs 19 and Protein were 48 = 67. If I am doing this correctly 72 minus 67 =5. So I am a 5.0 ?? And this is good?
I am heading back outside to work.
Thank you for the help.0 -
Chris;shadesofidaho wrote: »Well the day changed. The road was cleared so off to town to get more fencing but could not stop at grocery. Long load small parking lot.
Deansdad. If you could help me knock this into my head. As simple as it should be it is confusing me. My brain feels on overload.
I think my Food is visible to all. I will check. Yesterday I just ran a total on my foods to keep it simple. My Fats were 72 and my carbs 19 and Protein were 48 = 67. If I am doing this correctly 72 minus 67 =5. So I am a 5.0 ?? And this is good?
I am heading back outside to work.
Thank you for the help.
Close (and 5.0 would be spectacular.....), but....
Your example would actually be 1.07
F/(P+C)
72/(19+48)
72/67 = 1.07
or, for today (so far, w/o dinner), and yes, your diary is visible....
65F / (33P + 9C)
65/42 = 1.55
Both numbers are "good" (just not quite as good as 5.0 <g>)
But remember, it's just a "guide" not hard and fast.
As you get into the book you'll see how he uses the "fat burning ratio" on a meal by meal basis and it's perfectly acceptable to have one meal <1.0 and another >2.0.
He also ties it into the three "groups" which he calls 2+, 4+, and 8+ (still haven't figured out where those names come from).
The groups are roughly comparable to the concept "A" (and other LCHF programs) endorse.
For each group, he advises a strict, per meal (or per day) TOTAL carb limit (similar to the <20 carb "induction" phase).
He also suggests that as users "progress" on their dietary journey that they move from the first level (8+ for those with a large amount of weight to lose), to 4+ and then to 2+.
Again, similar to what a significant portion (if not the vast majority) of current proponents of "most" LCHF programs endorse.
He (and I believe the Scandinavian plan in general) is, however, more specific (and more stringent) on both the absolute numbers and individual issues like "cheats" and "net" carbs.
When you get to the individual menu items, you'll see that he provides "fat burning index" numbers for many of them. (and some will likely surprise you, they did me).
0 -
Thank you Deansdad,
I knew some thing was off. It is divided not subtracted. I will read more of the book and excited for the recipes. I took the book to town with us and read on the way down. Hubby was chatty on the way back. It looks like it will be much later tonight before I can do much more reading. Need to make dinner and I am going to quickly look for one of his sauces for some thing for me because hubby is having lasagna. A no no for me. He said it was good.
I guess I am an 8+ because I need to loose 60 pounds then more if I am up to it. I can not face more then the thought of 60. Only 18 down. But it goes so slow for me.
Thanks again. I will try to be more careful with each meal. I figured over all would be good enough. Guess not.
Chris0 -
I think I have it!! So I did okay with dinner except I realized I forgot to use a meat. I might have to add a hard boiled egg. His sauce was very good. It was Alfredo. I did not make as much as he said to make. I just made enough for this one meal.0
-
Chris;shadesofidaho wrote: »I think I have it!! So I did okay with dinner except I realized I forgot to use a meat. I might have to add a hard boiled egg. His sauce was very good. It was Alfredo. I did not make as much as he said to make. I just made enough for this one meal.
18# is nothing to sneeze at - you're off to a good start and more importantly approaching it with an attitude that will serve you well.
Glad you liked the sauce but too bad you didn't make more (it would have been great on a nice bacon, mushroom, spinach, and cheese omelette in the morning <g>.
Part of what I like about his recipes (and his approach) is that much of it goes along pretty well with what we have always done. (not so much the macros until recently but rather the "use whatever you have on hand" and "a little of this, little of that 'til it tastes good" cooking technique.
Even before we retired "leftovers" were a mainstay and he shares this approach too - "always make twice what you need and stick the rest in the frig for tomorrow" - works for us.
His stuffed, rolled, minute steaks for breakfast are on our "short list".
18+ is strict and you "might" want to ease into it but I have no doubt you'll do fine when you're ready and decide to jump in with both feet.
0 -
For now I am going to have to keep with what I know with a grain of what he is teaching until I can get into the swing of it. And LOTS of his recipes. I am going on what I remember from Atkins years ago and what I am learning here and another LCHF forum.
I would have made more sauce, tonight I was just too tired so broke it down to one portion for tonight. I do like to make meals to have left overs. Joe will be eating his lasagna for two more meals plus two meals in the freezer. Next time I do a lasagna for him I am going to do one for me with ingredients and sauce I can eat. I might do that soon as his looked so good. It was done in the crock pot. A FB recipe.0 -
I bought the book. I skimmed through it, read the section on 8+ (having more than 8 stone to lose) as it relates to me and then I skipped to the recipes. There is a list of recipes with links to the pages at the end of the book. You can link to the recipes from the Contents.
This is what I've been looking for. Simple, easy to follow recipes. Especially the sauces. I've had trouble adding fats and sauces are the answer. I made a sauce to have with steak last night and am making the hollandaise to have with bacon, eggs and spinach for breakfasts.
You are right that the book is book is written in an easy to follow and understand manner. I may one day go back and read the entire book but for now I have the information I was searching for.
Thanks DD.0 -
You are certainly most welcome and thanks for the review - hope it helps others.I bought the book. I skimmed through it, read the section on 8+ (having more than 8 stone to lose) as it relates to me and then I skipped to the recipes. There is a list of recipes with links to the pages at the end of the book. You can link to the recipes from the Contents.
This is what I've been looking for. Simple, easy to follow recipes. Especially the sauces. I've had trouble adding fats and sauces are the answer. I made a sauce to have with steak last night and am making the hollandaise to have with bacon, eggs and spinach for breakfasts.
You are right that the book is book is written in an easy to follow and understand manner. I may one day go back and read the entire book but for now I have the information I was searching for.
Thanks DD.
Glad you enjoyed and keep us posted on your "fav" sauces/menus.
Take care, enjoy the holidays, and "bon appetite"
0 -
Fascinating reading! I will definitely download the ebook.
One question, and maybe this is something discussed before, but I'm a newbie: to what extent do you all think genetics/ancestry plays a role in how well a person's body responds to LCHF living?
I ask because I've felt for years that I am just MEANT to eat this way, despite the naysaying of my doctors, nutritionist, and all and sundry. My family is Swedish, my mom first generation American, and when I saw the author, it clicked again. I also lived for a time in an Aleut village and ate a very subsistence high protein diet and was the healthiest I've ever been. Whenever I live out of this high carb cou,try, weight just falls off of me. Whenever I come back, it buries me.
K in Maine0 -
Hi Karen,
Genetics is why I started researching for a different approach to eating.
In January I committed to improving my health. I wasn't in a hurry and over the course of 10 months I generally became more active in life with doing any intentional exercise as such. I felt a lot better but hadn't lost any size. In fact, I was slightly larger which was a bit annoying to be honest. Feeling better and being able to get about a bit easier compensated for it though.
I went home for a week in June to visit my family. I hadn't seen my Dad in 8 years and it was news to me that his Type II diabetes had developed into Type I (insulin dependent) diabetes. I was surprised because I know that he spent a year eating low carb, lost 50+ kgs and had reduced his medication. Since then he has regained all the weight and I noticed that a large chunk of his diet is sugars and carbs. A quick look around the family would show anyone that being overweight/obese definitely runs in our family. This lead me to start researching the link between insulin and sugars and carbs. It made sense to me that if the body was having insulin issues then reducing sugars and carbs would help ease them.
I was frankly amazed at how much new research there is and also watched a science based tv program about brand new research into low carb eating. (The link for those interested abc.net.au/catalyst/lowcarb/ ) I decided to try it out and see if it helped me. It did. It's only been 6 weeks but I've felt a marked improvement in my energy levels, the strength in my muscles and my size has decreased. One major improvement I noticed was that I could walk up the hill at the local school without feeling as though I was going to collapse. I did it 3 times. This improvement came not from increased exercise but from simply changing my diet. But I digress.
My husband is 6'3" and lanky and eats far more than I do without doing a whole lot of exercise. We eat basically the same foods and he could never understand why we could eat so differently and our bodies responded so radically differently. He's commented on many occasions that I ate far healthier than he did.
So yes, I believe there is a genetic link. This is also most likely why different eating programs suit different people. One size does NOT fit all.
Cheers.
1 -
K;Fascinating reading! I will definitely download the ebook.
One question, and maybe this is something discussed before, but I'm a newbie: to what extent do you all think genetics/ancestry plays a role in how well a person's body responds to LCHF living?
I ask because I've felt for years that I am just MEANT to eat this way, despite the naysaying of my doctors, nutritionist, and all and sundry. My family is Swedish, my mom first generation American, and when I saw the author, it clicked again. I also lived for a time in an Aleut village and ate a very subsistence high protein diet and was the healthiest I've ever been. Whenever I live out of this high carb cou,try, weight just falls off of me. Whenever I come back, it buries me.
K in Maine
I'm not familiar with any research that would relate to "...genetics/ancestry plays a role in...how a person's body responds to LCHF...".
As far as I know, genetics "can" have an impact on IF a person is prone to insulin resistance but it's more of a "somewhat increased" probability than a definite thing.
Thyroid issues are similar and I think more closely related to genetics on the maternal side.
But both of those deal more with the "problems" LCHF can address than with how a individual will respond to being on the diet itself (as opposed to being on a high carb diet).
So, short answer (and it's really more a "guess" than it is an "answer") is, I doubt either have much effect at all.
To ancestry, again there are certainly ancestry specific examples of different cultures adapting in different ways to traditional diets but there are also examples of when those cultures have been exposed to "western" (high carb) diets they too develop the same types of problems (obesity, T2D, etc) in very short order where none existed historically.
Again, it's conjecture on my part but I doubt in your case that either genetics or ancestry would have much, if any, impact on how you would respond to LCHF.
Even with your Swedish heritage, not necessarily because ancestry might not be a factor, but rather because up until fairly recently the Swedes were following pretty much the same diet and nutrition advice (USDA low fat/high carb) as us.
They were among the first to question it though and are today on the forefront of reversing the "conventional wisdom" (years ahead of us).
I'm not familiar with Still's but a quick trip to the googlemachine tells me that it appears to have inflammation at its root (as we are learning so many problems do) but no direct ties to
insulin levels, at least from what I've seen. You did say though that weight has been a problem for you most of your life and you seem to have discovered a fairly consistent correlation between carb intake and weight gain/loss over the years so it's probably a safe bet to assume either some level of IR or at least carb intolerance and there's little doubt any longer that for "most" in that circumstance LCHF is "just what the doctor ordered" (except that they too often don't).
I'm not an md, dietitian, or nutritionist and can't comment on whatever else you have going on that may be having an impact, but you certainly wouldn't be the first person with a similar set of circumstances to receive dietary advice based on the "cut the fat, increase fruits, grains, and vegs, and exercise more" dogma when in fact your symptoms might indicate exactly the opposite.
Neither would you be the first to encounter medical/nutritional "experts" so set in their ways as to pull out the drug script pad and schedule surgery while dismissing out of hand the dietary advice that might just address the problem with less drastic measures.
My advice would be to seek out the services of a doctor familiar with, and not predisposed to "naysay" LCHF out of hand and at least provide a second opinion taking into consideration whatever interactions might be involved given your other "issues".
My "guess" would be that you would experience the same, or similar results by adopting an LCHF diet that most do but the Still's (and associated meds) is a wildcard and were I you, I'd want that second opinion.
Here's a link that might help you locate a more "enlightened" doc near you:
http://tinyurl.com/kojqy7
Looks like there are three not that far from you and even one right in your hometown.
BTW, love Maine too.
My parents had a cottage on Sebago and we spent our summers there when I was a kid (back in the stone age). One of my first jobs after school was working on a CMP powerline that ran from Cousins Island to Biddeford.....pretty country but these days the winters are just too much for me.
Best of luck and enjoy the holidays0 -
Quick response---thanks for your insights! I'm not far from Sebago and am privileged to live on a clean Maine lake that I swim every day in summer.0
-
Sajyana, like you, I think the jury is still out on the genetic component of diet suitability. Deansdad, when I was thinking ancestors' diets, I was thinking pre-modern. What did my Viking and Celtic ancestors eat? I know they were seafaring, so presumably a lot of northern sea fish. Interestingly, when I lived in the Aleutians, we ate fresh salmon, halibut, and crab constantly and I thrived. My husband's people are Aztec. My neighbor is Chinese. I'd be curious to know more about their ancestors' dietary staples (ancient, protein heavy grains like quinoa? Bulgar? Rice?). I have quite a few friends who love plant-based eating. Were their ancestors inland dwellers, nomadic gatherers? Just spit-balling here. I wonder if Michael Pollan has explored this.
I just had a sleeve gastrectomy (surgical reduction of the size of my stomach) for a number of reasons (35+ years of eating disorders and yoyo dieting, hypothyroidism, menopause, and being stuck on prednisone, to name a few), and after our initial liquid diet phase, the rule for eating is basic: protein first. After healing, there are no restrictions on what I CAN eat, but because the quantity is restricted, I need to choose wisely. So protein first, then fat, then MAYBE a veg. Very little room for fruits. None for carbs. Absolutely no sugar. Since this is my preferred way of eating, I'm excited to have a tool for portion control, my nemesis.
Oooops, babbling on here!
Oh, and DeansDad, AOSD (adult onset Still's disease) is rare and poorly researched, but it's typically lumped in with autoinflammatory disorders or periodic fever syndromes like familial Mediterranean fever. It occurs equally among men and women and equally in countries all over the globe, with slightly higher numbers in Japan, Norway, Nigeria, and Turkey, but even there only 2 out of a million get it. The disease has been a chronic horror show in my life for ten years, unchanged by diet, alternative medicines, or climate.
K in Maine
0 -
Sajyana, like you, I think the jury is still out on the genetic component of diet suitability. Deansdad, when I was thinking ancestors' diets, I was thinking pre-modern. What did my Viking and Celtic ancestors eat? I know they were seafaring, so presumably a lot of northern sea fish. Interestingly, when I lived in the Aleutians, we ate fresh salmon, halibut, and crab constantly and I thrived. My husband's people are Aztec. My neighbor is Chinese. I'd be curious to know more about their ancestors' dietary staples (ancient, protein heavy grains like quinoa? Bulgar? Rice?). I have quite a few friends who love plant-based eating. Were their ancestors inland dwellers, nomadic gatherers? Just spit-balling here. I wonder if Michael Pollan has explored this.
Vikings were as much farmers, shepherds, and hunters as they were fishermen. A large portion of the meat from their diet came from caribou, pork (they raised hogs), and even horse. The amount and types of vegetation they ate depended on where they were at, but things like carrots, cabbage, apples, and other such hardy plants were not uncommon.0 -
[quote= ...What did my Viking and Celtic ancestors eat?...[/quote]
These Northern Natives may not be your ancestry...
interesting article about their traditional diet:
In your fav search engine:
"The Sami paradox or how to dismiss a traditional low carb, high protein diet" 0 -
That settles it! We must have been Sami, not Viking! How interesting. I had no idea reindeer milk was high in fat.
Incidentally, I've been reading Skaldeman's book today, and I think the best parts are the recipes.
K.0 -
Yes, discovery is interesting...
and one of the health benefits
success stories of Sweden's
Sten Sture Skaldeman's KISS formulaic
discovery is Tommy, also of Sweden.
His Skaldeman biometric journal
is posted online...
eatlowcarbhighfat.com.
Mr Skaldeman has his own website...
skaldeman.se/home.html
Keeping It Simple in Sweden 0
