C25k: Time or Distance

MimiOfTheLusciousLawn

Just finished w5. Noticed that it said jog 2 miles or 20 minutes. I can do the 20 (even 22), but because I'm slow, I certainly don't get 2 miles in. Should I work to get to the mileage level or continue meeting the time?

ftrobbie

Choose 1 and just stick with it, most people tend to stick to time but recognise that at the end of the programme you are unlikely to be running a 5k in 30 minutes or less. C25K is about getting you up and about and letting your body adapt to running. If you are slow as you suggest, I would tend to recommend doing the time based version as the last thing you need is for sessions to drag on and on, and there is a tendency to run to fast just to get the session done. By concentrating on time you spend more time running with a fixed time commitment. Good luck on your journey

frankie5152

Stick with the time for now the distance will come

mbaker566

i prefer time. i feel distance will come in time. like the others said

MimiOfTheLusciousLawn

Time it is! Thanks for your input!!

GBrady43068

MimiOfTheLusciousLawn wrote: »

Just finished w5. Noticed that it said jog 2 miles or 20 minutes. I can do the 20 (even 22), but because I'm slow, I certainly don't get 2 miles in. Should I work to get to the mileage level or continue meeting the time?

I am a firm believer in time. As your cardiovascular system gets stronger, distance will take care of itself. But if you doubt, get a decent running ap on your phone (I use RunKeeper but there's lots out there including some that MFP promote) and just look at your stats. You will notice your average pace getting quicker and quicker.

When I started running, it was tough to get through 20 minutes of mixed running/walking at ANY pace. After less than two years, I can do 2 1/2 hours of run/walk at maximum and my pace is close to a 10 minute mile for what I now consider a "short to medium" distance run.

So where the (shoe) rubber hits the road is: 20 minutes at one point meant about 2 miles. 20 minutes is now closer to 4. So if you combine about double the speed with a stronger system, you reach where I am now...training for a half marathon.

MimiOfTheLusciousLawn

Holy moly, that's awesome! I'd like to simply run a full 5k under 48mins. That's goal #1. And I use Runkeeper, but I'm not so sure on its reliability.

BabyLovesToRun

Once I purchased my Garmin I quit using the phone Aps. I used the Garmin and RunKeeper to compare a couple days, RunKeeper was off by up to .20 of a mile. I also noticed that, after paying attention, it always marked my 1 mile mark in a different spot every day. Also, just focus on the time, don't worry about how much distance you cover it in.

mbaker566

I've found my garmin to be the inaccurate one. runkeeper is closer to the actual mileage per google maps.

Some people recommend Strava but I have no exeperience with it.