9 Reasons Fat Loss is Always Slower Than You’d Like

Sarauk2sf
Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
Yet another excellent article by Armi Legge.

http://impruvism.com/slow-fat-loss/
«13

Replies

  • susieoj
    susieoj Posts: 181
    Love it. So true.
  • jlapey
    jlapey Posts: 1,850 Member
    Bumping so my other MFP friends can read this too.

    Thanks, Sara.
  • UsedToBeHusky
    UsedToBeHusky Posts: 15,228 Member
    Subconciously, I think we all want to stay fat. LOL!

    I'm guilty of more than 50% of this at some point or another, but I'll get there.

    Question, going to start weighing food soon. I haven't yet. Should I weigh before or after cooking?

    Right now, when I cook meat I just take the weight of the raw meat and divide it by its portions.
  • ReinasWrath
    ReinasWrath Posts: 1,173 Member
    Good read :flowerforyou:
  • dare2love81
    dare2love81 Posts: 928 Member
    Subconciously, I think we all want to stay fat. LOL!

    I'm guilty of more than 50% of this at some point or another, but I'll get there.

    Question, going to start weighing food soon. I haven't yet. Should I weigh before or after cooking?

    Right now, when I cook meat I just take the weight of the raw meat and divide it by its portions.

    1375775_10201007897982776_534360207_n.jpg

    Aww...how do I shrink it so you can read it all?
  • UsedToBeHusky
    UsedToBeHusky Posts: 15,228 Member
    Subconciously, I think we all want to stay fat. LOL!

    I'm guilty of more than 50% of this at some point or another, but I'll get there.

    Question, going to start weighing food soon. I haven't yet. Should I weigh before or after cooking?

    Right now, when I cook meat I just take the weight of the raw meat and divide it by its portions.

    1375775_10201007897982776_534360207_n.jpg

    Aww...how do I shrink it so you can read it all?

    I've seen it before. It's one of my favorites! LOL!
  • Will_Thrust_For_Candy
    Will_Thrust_For_Candy Posts: 6,109 Member
    Tagging for all the WIN in this article! Thanks Sara!
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Subconciously, I think we all want to stay fat. LOL!

    I'm guilty of more than 50% of this at some point or another, but I'll get there.

    Question, going to start weighing food soon. I haven't yet. Should I weigh before or after cooking?

    Right now, when I cook meat I just take the weight of the raw meat and divide it by its portions.

    It depends on what the database entries you are using are. Use the one consistent with whether cooked or raw. I would use the raw one though.
  • LoraF83
    LoraF83 Posts: 15,694 Member
    Subconciously, I think we all want to stay fat. LOL!

    I don't. I most definitely do not want to be fat.
  • sluggz
    sluggz Posts: 134
    GREAT READ! I am quickly becoming a fan of that website.
  • BusyRaeNOTBusty
    BusyRaeNOTBusty Posts: 7,166 Member
    Awesome. WITH citations even.
  • ghsfitnesspal
    ghsfitnesspal Posts: 260 Member
    I'm stuck here:

    "2.Many people don’t account for how the weight or volume of food changes after it’s been cooked. For instance, baked sweet potatoes can lose half of their weight in water after cooking. If you calculate your calorie intake based on the weight of raw sweet potatoes, you’ll be eating 100% more calories than you thought."

    But if I weigh a potato and it was 300g before baking it, and I eat that same potato, how am I now eating more? The only way I can think he means is that if I log 300g of sweet potato AFTER I cooked it, but logged it using the raw sweet potato entry in the database. Is that what he mean?

    Otherwise, I can see all o' it! thanks for the article :)
  • RachelX04
    RachelX04 Posts: 1,123 Member
    great article. thanks for posting
  • Rachaelluvszipped
    Rachaelluvszipped Posts: 768 Member
    This is why I :love: OP!!! Sarah :flowerforyou:
  • nomeejerome
    nomeejerome Posts: 2,616 Member
    in to read later
  • walterm852
    walterm852 Posts: 409 Member
    Sarah, thanks for the post, and the reference to Armi. Someone here at MFP posted a link from him before (may have been you), I added my to my twitter feed, he is an awesome resource.
  • mandeenicoleb
    mandeenicoleb Posts: 479 Member
    Amazing read! Thanks for that.
  • TygerTwoTails
    TygerTwoTails Posts: 108 Member
    This is great, thanks!
  • opalescence
    opalescence Posts: 413 Member
    I really love that website.

    :love: :flowerforyou:
  • mazmataz
    mazmataz Posts: 331 Member
    Number 3: You burn less calories through daily movements.

    This is a revalation for me, so true! Over the past few weeks I've upped my workouts and I'm training 5+ days a week. However I have found that when it comes to every day tasks i.e. taking the stairs instead of the elivator, popping across to the shop, getting up to go to a colleague's desk at work vs. dropping them an email...I've become sooo lazy! I'm just zapped of energy...but I always manage to pull it together for my big workouts as I actually enjoy them.

    Interesting!
  • Buddhasmiracle
    Buddhasmiracle Posts: 925 Member
    For read later
  • aakaakaak
    aakaakaak Posts: 1,240 Member
    7. You're a woman

    Solution: Be a man

    :drinker:
  • Kamikazeflutterby
    Kamikazeflutterby Posts: 770 Member
    I'm stuck here:

    "2.Many people don’t account for how the weight or volume of food changes after it’s been cooked. For instance, baked sweet potatoes can lose half of their weight in water after cooking. If you calculate your calorie intake based on the weight of raw sweet potatoes, you’ll be eating 100% more calories than you thought."

    But if I weigh a potato and it was 300g before baking it, and I eat that same potato, how am I now eating more? The only way I can think he means is that if I log 300g of sweet potato AFTER I cooked it, but logged it using the raw sweet potato entry in the database. Is that what he mean?

    Otherwise, I can see all o' it! thanks for the article :)

    I'm stuck here too. I *think* any water cooking out of something wouldn't affect the calories of the individual item because, well, it's water. But cooking water out of something would make it lighter, and maybe smaller in volume. Like, one strawberry will have the same calories as one dried strawberry, but one cup or ounce of dried strawberries will have a bajillion more calories than one cup of raw strawberries just because you can cram more in there.

    I'd like to hear from someone who knows more, though.
  • shellylb52
    shellylb52 Posts: 157 Member
    Bump for the great article :drinker:
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    7. You're a woman

    Solution: Be a man

    :drinker:

    I lift heavy arsed weights so apparently I am already working on rectifying that issue!
  • PikaKnight
    PikaKnight Posts: 34,971 Member
    Awesome read and tagging for others on my FL.

    I freakin' loved the Snowflake one. Laughed so hard :laugh:
  • kyleekay10
    kyleekay10 Posts: 1,812 Member
    I'm stuck here:

    "2.Many people don’t account for how the weight or volume of food changes after it’s been cooked. For instance, baked sweet potatoes can lose half of their weight in water after cooking. If you calculate your calorie intake based on the weight of raw sweet potatoes, you’ll be eating 100% more calories than you thought."

    But if I weigh a potato and it was 300g before baking it, and I eat that same potato, how am I now eating more? The only way I can think he means is that if I log 300g of sweet potato AFTER I cooked it, but logged it using the raw sweet potato entry in the database. Is that what he mean?

    Otherwise, I can see all o' it! thanks for the article :)

    I'm stuck here too. I *think* any water cooking out of something wouldn't affect the calories of the individual item because, well, it's water. But cooking water out of something would make it lighter, and maybe smaller in volume. Like, one strawberry will have the same calories as one dried strawberry, but one cup or ounce of dried strawberries will have a bajillion more calories than one cup of raw strawberries just because you can cram more in there.

    I'd like to hear from someone who knows more, though.

    Yeah, that was worded funny for me, too. I thought you always weigh/log raw, and don't pay attention the weight after cooking.
  • mazmataz
    mazmataz Posts: 331 Member
    7. You're a woman

    Solution: Be a man

    :drinker:

    I lift heavy arsed weights so apparently I am already working on rectifying that issue!

    Oh no, I think this lady beat you to it: ;)

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2471523/Steroids-turned-man--The-female-bodybuilder-drug-habit-left-penis-facial-hair.html
  • sjohnny
    sjohnny Posts: 56,142 Member
    Subconciously, I think we all want to stay fat. LOL!

    Ummm. NO!

    Sure, there are SOME who look for any excuse they can but I think MOST here have absolutely no desire, subconsciously, unconsciously, semi-consciously, consciously or otherwise, to stay fat.
  • PikaKnight
    PikaKnight Posts: 34,971 Member
    Subconciously, I think we all want to stay fat. LOL!

    Ummm. NO!

    Sure, there are SOME who look for any excuse they can but I think MOST here have absolutely no desire, subconsciously, unconsciously, semi-consciously, consciously or otherwise, to stay fat.

    ^This