Cadence - must be 180.00? (or you're not really running!)

2»

Replies

  • RunConquerCelebrate
    RunConquerCelebrate Posts: 956 Member
    I have to agree with you 180 is pretty fast, I have also been trying to work on my cadence just because I was having knee issues and a lot of people suggested that I work on my cadence. I also downloaded an app on my phone, the first time I used it I was around 160s. Last week I went out and really tried to hit the 180 my Nike app said I was running 9:30 mins per mile, I was SHOCKED!! :) that is pretty fast for me when I race I am usually in the 10 to 10:30. I ran that pace for a mile and a half and I could not keep up.

    But I am not giving up, for me the issue is not height it is my weight. I still have weight to loose and hoping that when the pounds drop I can run faster :)
  • tappae
    tappae Posts: 568 Member
    Aghh this is driving me nuts! I read this thread, thought that makes sense, and on my last couple of runs have tried to find my cadence. Right, count every left footed strike for a minute and multiply by 2. Simples, except it isn't. I lose track of the count within a few seconds, I run into people because I'm looking at my watch and I slow down because I'm not concentrating on running.
    Is this because I'm an old man or because I have no co-ordination?

    You could carry a small, electronic metronome or get a metronome app for your phone. The beeping (or whatever) will be annoying, but you shouldn't have to use it for very long to get an idea.

    Thanks for this advice, I did get a metronome app and went out for a run. Bloody Hell, 180 is very fast. I just couldn't keep it up. I recon I am running at about 150 and for the moment that will have to do. I am over 6ft tall with long legs.

    I haven't actually tried 180 yet. After I read Chi Running, I switched to 170 and it took a while. At first, I just couldn't move my feet that fast at any speed, but it was hardest at slow speeds. I made a mix tape of songs that were all that tempo and that helped a lot. It made me think of running more like dancing. Now, I can run very slow at that cadence. When I try and run fast, though, my cadence is even faster (maybe close to 180), and I've had to stop using the music during races and speed work.
  • TheBrolympus
    TheBrolympus Posts: 586 Member
    I am 6'2" with long legs and was running around 150. Once I started to work on my cadence I would just try to push it up 5 steps at a time. For me upping my cadence engaged my *kitten* muscles quite a bit. Trying to push the cadence too fast resulted some sore muscles. After a couple of months I can go out comfortably between 168-170. If I am pushing the pace I can get up to 174. This change seems to have helped my form.
  • fleetzz
    fleetzz Posts: 962 Member
    I think my 10 year old does that naturally. I don't know if 180 is his rate, but it is a hell of a lot faster than mine, and he runs faster than I do.I have tried to up my cadence but it is quite a bit of work. Have a hard time to maintain it, when I zone out I fall back to my natural slow jog.
  • KeithAngilly
    KeithAngilly Posts: 575 Member
    my (admittedly inexperienced) opinion is that obsessing over a number is very much less important than paying attention to running form. By doing so, our cadence will naturally increase. Peter Larson has a really good handle on communicating this: http://runblogger.com/2010/08/on-running-form-ii-where-should.html

    If you pay attention to where your foot contacts the ground on the forward swing, making an effort to land closer to the body (with the foot already move to the rear), you'll find your cadence will increase all by itself. Approaching it the other way around is more difficult, I think.
  • blackcloud13
    blackcloud13 Posts: 654 Member
    Aghh this is driving me nuts! I read this thread, thought that makes sense, and on my last couple of runs have tried to find my cadence. Right, count every left footed strike for a minute and multiply by 2. Simples, except it isn't. I lose track of the count within a few seconds, I run into people because I'm looking at my watch and I slow down because I'm not concentrating on running.
    Is this because I'm an old man or because I have no co-ordination?

    You could carry a small, electronic metronome or get a metronome app for your phone. The beeping (or whatever) will be annoying, but you shouldn't have to use it for very long to get an idea.

    Thanks for this advice, I did get a metronome app and went out for a run. Bloody Hell, 180 is very fast. I just couldn't keep it up. I recon I am running at about 150 and for the moment that will have to do. I am over 6ft tall with long legs.

    I've tried a couple of times now - I use a metronome on my phone, and aim for three steps per beat (to stay symmetrical) and I'm trying 165 now. Its unnaturally fast for me, and I get tired really quickly - but I get the feeling that if I train like thus for a while it will pay off
  • tappae
    tappae Posts: 568 Member
    my (admittedly inexperienced) opinion is that obsessing over a number is very much less important than paying attention to running form. By doing so, our cadence will naturally increase. Peter Larson has a really good handle on communicating this: http://runblogger.com/2010/08/on-running-form-ii-where-should.html

    If you pay attention to where your foot contacts the ground on the forward swing, making an effort to land closer to the body (with the foot already move to the rear), you'll find your cadence will increase all by itself. Approaching it the other way around is more difficult, I think.

    I think obsessing over anything is probably a bad idea, but which direction to think about it seems like it might be subjective. For me, a naturally long-striding heel striker, speeding up my cadence forced me to shorten my stride and land with my feet moving behind me. This improved my running a lot.

    Reading Chi Running is what helped me change my form for the better, and cadence is presented as just part of the total package of correct form. In fact, he gave me so many things to think about while running, that I can only concentrate on a few at a time.
  • KeithAngilly
    KeithAngilly Posts: 575 Member
    my (admittedly inexperienced) opinion is that obsessing over a number is very much less important than paying attention to running form. By doing so, our cadence will naturally increase. Peter Larson has a really good handle on communicating this: http://runblogger.com/2010/08/on-running-form-ii-where-should.html

    If you pay attention to where your foot contacts the ground on the forward swing, making an effort to land closer to the body (with the foot already move to the rear), you'll find your cadence will increase all by itself. Approaching it the other way around is more difficult, I think.


    I think obsessing over anything is probably a bad idea, but which direction to think about it seems like it might be subjective. For me, a naturally long-striding heel striker, speeding up my cadence forced me to shorten my stride and land with my feet moving behind me. This improved my running a lot.

    Reading Chi Running is what helped me change my form for the better, and cadence is presented as just part of the total package of correct form. In fact, he gave me so many things to think about while running, that I can only concentrate on a few at a time.

    I hear ya' tappae. We are all a sample of one and different things work better for some than others. My feeling is that mindlessly just chasing a number without knowing why we are doing it (which I am sure Chi Running lays out) is putting the cart before the horse. I am sure of this, though: If someone works on improving their running form through really understanding what they are trying to accomplish, then a quicker cadence will happen automatically. Brian Martin's book (Running Technique) was really helpful for me: http://www.runningtechniquetips.com/

    Good luck!
  • dorianaldyn
    dorianaldyn Posts: 611 Member
    Interesting thread! Cadence is never something I paid much attention to... I have paid attention to my form; I do make an effort to always land mid-foot, etc. I just logged into Garmin Connect and apparently on my last run (11 miles) my average cadence was 179. I don't run particularly fast but I am rather short (I'm about 5'2"). In any case, sounds like I should just keep doing what I'm doing.
  • walterm852
    walterm852 Posts: 409 Member
    I went to running store and had my running form checked. My right side is over striding (not close to being over hip, heel strike is unstable, pronate outward). Both legs are the same length. He recommended I practice cadence and said to find an app to help.

    Any follow up recommendations on an app to practice cadence for runs for iphone?

    Thanks for topic
  • blackcloud13
    blackcloud13 Posts: 654 Member
    I went to running store and had my running form checked. My right side is over striding (not close to being over hip, heel strike is unstable, pronate outward). Both legs are the same length. He recommended I practice cadence and said to find an app to help.

    Any follow up recommendations on an app to practice cadence for runs for iphone?

    Thanks for topic

    You can download a Metronome app (free) on an iPhone and then try to run to the tempo. Possibly best to firstly find out what your current cadence is - if its too far from 180, you should probably set your target cadence partway there

    Good luck