Difference between running and trail running shoes?

mamakira

Can anyone please explain me the difference? I try to find new routes and most of them I would consider trails. Stoney, eneven surface, hills, mud, puddles...I don´t want to hurt my ankles.
I went to the sportsshop today and all they have are running shoes, walking shoes and hiking shoes. There is nothing in between. I have read about trail running shoes in other discussions though.

timeasterday

I have two pairs of trail shoes. They tend to have some knobby grips to get traction on uneven terrain & rocks vs. a flatter sole on running shoes. Many have a bit more cushion than a running shoe. The pair I like the most are ASICS Fuji Racers. They are more of a minimalist trail shoe - very light without much padding. You do feel every bump and rock on the trail but I like feeling connected to the surface. They also have drain channels in the bottom so water doesn't stay in. When you step in a puddle the water comes right in through the bottom but it drains right out quickly. They also have a little pocket on the tongue to hide your laces so the laces don't get caught on anything.

I also tried the ASICS Fuji Trainer and they have more support & cushioning. The Brooks Cascadia is another good one I tried. My wife got the Saucony Xodus in addition to the Fuji Racers. I also tried the Xodus and they felt very good. But the minimalist feel of the Fuji Racer is what really got me to buy those. They feel like they are made just for my feet. My other trail shoes are LaSportiva Wildcats and they are a bit bulky but I got them at a steal of a price. Probably won't run in them but I wear them to light hiking or just as casual "going out" shoes.