I can see both sides. There seems to be some evidence that people lost more fat eating the bulk of their calories in the morning. Some evidence shows it's better to eat in "window" of 8 hours. I don't know, if it's working for you, then go with it, and if it stops working, switch it up, I spose.

If you're staying within your goal then it doesn't matter when you eat more or less of your calories. If this is working best for you, keep doing it

I know it's the opposite of what we're usually told but I do it too. For me, it's because I can then share a meal with my boyfriend instead of being finished for the day when he still wants dinner! Less temptation if I'm still allowed a few hundred calories. And then I can cook for both of us at once.

Like everyone else here I do the same. 200 for breakfast 300 for lunch and the remainder for dinner and snacks. I can't make it through the night any other way. I honestly don't think it matters as long as it is working for you.

I tend to eat most of my calories in the evening.. When I get up I have a nescafe cappachino (sachet, just add to water), and then I don't usually eat until I have something at 1pm. Most of what I eat is in the evenings, and I also don't have a time limit on when to stop eating, I let my self eat until bed if I want too. Its what I have always done and find it works best for me. For a while I did listen to the 'always eat breakfast rule' and I found it made me sluggish, bloated and throughout the full day all I did was eat so I went back to what my body finds best. Everybody is different, and as long as you stick to the calories in v's calories out rule, I don't think it matters what time you eat.