I adjusted MFP to come close to the BMF number for calories consumed. But mainly I focus on the calorie deficit number in BMF. My burn numbers are all over the place. (I don't have a 'typical' day.) So I try to make sure I hit my calorie deficit.

I've set my net calorie target on MFP lower than the standard 1200 for women because the BMF burn data imports as activity. If my net calories were 1200 on MFP, then I wouldn't hit my calorie burn on BMF. What I do is to look go to the "Exercise" tab and click on the BMF adjustment. It'll show you your BMF projected calorie burn and the MFP standard calculation and the difference. In order to hit right on my deficit (1000), I subtract 1000 from the MFP and set that as my goal net calories, that way, the adjustments put me right where I need to be to hit my deficit on BMF.

The original goal that BM gives you is just based on the info you put in. I would suggest wearing it for a couple of weeks to see how much you are actually burning, then you can adjust your goals based on your actual burn. Mine originally told me to eat 1950 because it thought I would burn 2450. I was only able to work out a couple of days a week at that time, so I didn't burn that much every day. Once I got a good idea of what I burned on a normal day, I changed my goals to burn 2150 and eat 1650 on BM. But I mainly tried to keep about a 500-600 calorie deficit each day by eating more on the days I burned more and less on days I didn't burn as much. As far as making the goals the same, you don't have to worry about that. If you enable negative adjustments in MFP, the burn numbers will come out the same, then you just have to decide how much or how little to eat based on the deficit to get you to your goal.

Good luck! I lost the last 20 hardest to lose pounds with BMF, then I started maintenance a year ago. BM and MFP have allowed me to stay within 5 lbs. of my goal ever since.