Third time is a charm...

Tried posting this twice now and every time I hit a wrong button and lost everything...copy and paste is now my best friend!

Okay, so for the past two years I was eating more "primal" and was the manager of the local organic market. My job there ended (very badly) because of not agreeing with many of their practices, including lying about what was in a lot of things they were selling. Besides the point though! The point is that I absolutely refuse to give them my money, RE-FUSE. Instead once a month or so I either drive 45 minutes to the Lowe's Food (where they have a small amount of grassfed beef and kerrygold) or I drive the 45 minutes to Whole Foods (where their grassfed butter is actually cheaper than Lowe's...and I have more options for things.)

So since I stopped working there and won't give them my money, added in with some depression from no longer working there since I *loved* my customers, and now working a job that I'm less than excited about (and am making less money)...I haven't been eating the best.

However, I have been able to lose ten pounds since the 16th of November because I am eating at a caloric deficit. I'm not eating super bad, but definitely have some processed foods in there and a ton of grains. Not happy with it. Now I'm much happier, I'm making bonuses at work and can afford more groceries....and I want to get back on track. My friends who are primal/paleo always say that it's stupid to eat at a deficit as long as they are "quality calories" and to stop worrying about it, but I would prefer to still count calories and eat at a deficit until I get down to my goal weight, then it's just a matter of maintaining.

VERY long story short (I have no idea why I even felt all the back story was necessary, but I'm long-winded...it's in my nature) those of you who were eating this way and trying to lose weight, were you just eating quality calories and not worrying about eating at a deficit? Or did you eat at a deficit? What were your experiences?

Replies

  • strychnine7
    strychnine7 Posts: 210 Member
    Welcome. When I first set out on this diet, I lost weight effortlessly without a single calorie counted. Now that I'm with striking distance of my goal weight, and have been for the last year or so, things stopped moving altogether, even with strict calorie counting. I recently just said "screw it" and stopped logging my food. I'm just eating clean when I want, and how much I want. If I lose weight then great. If not, then I already know it's not worth the effort to try any harder anyway.

    So, I say it's not stupid to count calories. But you may not have to.
  • Lizzard_77
    Lizzard_77 Posts: 232 Member
    I too have had similar effects. My body changed dramatically when i first went primal, well i started out Whole30 then went to paleo, and am now primal with a bit of WAPF thrown in (less and less as time goes). I was amazed at the changes in my body, like everything was changing places. But I wasn't losing weight. No matter the quality of ingredients or the strictness of lifestyle I don't lose weight unless I eat at a deficit. I don't understand it and I try to account for the fact that I am gaining muscle but I simply don't lose. I know I have to eat back some of my exercise calories to stay healthy, therefore I try to get in a good amount of exercise, but I also just don't want to eat as much as is needed to reach my calorie goal. I get where you are coming from, right there with ya!
  • Akimajuktuq
    Akimajuktuq Posts: 3,037 Member
    In the beginning of my keto Primal MFP journey I made the mistake of letting MFP calculate my calories, and of course I was like most newbies and entered a 2 pound per week weight loss goal... so I was undereating for the first 6 months. Yes, I initially lost weight fast but then stalled badly in the first half of 2013. So now I calculate my own calories (and yes, I eat at a deficit but not a large one- 164 pounds currently and set 1600 calories) and I am doing very well. I only have about 15-20 pounds left to lose so it is expected that it will go slowly.

    My best advice would be:

    1. Adhere to your eating plan MOST of the time (lots of cheats and treats will derail many of us)
    2. Set a calorie goal with only a small to moderate deficit. It's not a race.
    3. Eat back some of your exercise calories.
    4. On days where you are very hungry, don't be afraid to go over your calories, but stick to healthy foods (watch the sugars-yes that means fruit!). Sometimes you really do need some extra fat and protein, so don't deny your body.

  • My best advice would be:

    1. Adhere to your eating plan MOST of the time (lots of cheats and treats will derail many of us)
    2. Set a calorie goal with only a small to moderate deficit. It's not a race.
    3. Eat back some of your exercise calories.
    4. On days where you are very hungry, don't be afraid to go over your calories, but stick to healthy foods (watch the sugars-yes that means fruit!). Sometimes you really do need some extra fat and protein, so don't deny your body.
    Oh yea, I'm very happy to say I already stick to most of this :). I do have at least one "cheat" every day, but it's never anything large and I only take one with me to work so I don't get tempted to cheat. I currently eat back about half of my exercise calories, mostly not doing all of them because of a margin of error in how many calories were actually burned :).

    I definitely feel you on the letting MFP calculate calories, they put me at 1200 calories -- no way! I do have mine set to 1300, but I gave myself that for wiggle room with the fact that I don't (and won't) weigh things on a food scale. I typically eat closer to 1400, though less this past week because I've been sick.

    Thanks everyone!
  • PaleoPath4Lyfe
    PaleoPath4Lyfe Posts: 3,161 Member
    I don't count calories eating this way for a couple of reasons..................

    The first and main reason is because when I do count calories eating this way, I am way under eating most days.

    Secondly, I find I stress and obsess and that stalls my weight loss tremendously.

    I just go with the motto of eating the best quality I possibly can. Eat when hungry and don't force myself to eat when not hungry.
  • Akimajuktuq
    Akimajuktuq Posts: 3,037 Member
    I don't really understand a daily "cheat" but if you can make that work with no problems with health or cravings etc. then so be it. I really love how I feel and what I eat so don't really view things as "cheats", but as a choice.
  • I don't really understand a daily "cheat" but if you can make that work with no problems with health or cravings etc. then so be it. I really love how I feel and what I eat so don't really view things as "cheats", but as a choice.
    Oh I do that because I'm the opposite haha -- if I didn't eat something "bad" daily I would end up cheating badly and falling off the wagon lol. Also my idea of a daily cheat, for example, is a square of organic dark chocolate or one/two almond meal cacao cookies :P. I never go overboard and I have zero problems with cravings this way and my health is (and has always been thankfully) spectacular. I just had a lot of weight gain during my pregnancies that I just couldn't seem to shake. I have three kids and gained 40, 60, and 80 pounds during my pregnancies...while eating a very healthy diet, still exercising, and not having any issues such as gestational diabetes. My midwife saw my food diary and knew I'm not the type to fudge things and so she had no qualms with my weight gain since everything was absolutely fine. I also have had large babies, my smallest being over 8 pounds. Everyone has told me I would lose some of the last weight here once my youngest isn't nursing (he turned two in October), but I didn't have to "wait to lose" with my other two children, I lost the weight fairly quickly -- it's only been this time that I'm hanging onto part of it. I'm at 150 right now (down from 160, my highest weight during pregnancy was 200), wanting to get down to 130.

    So anyway randomly going into my life story there haha, sorry about that!
  • Dragonwolf
    Dragonwolf Posts: 5,600 Member
    My friends who are primal/paleo always say that it's stupid to eat at a deficit as long as they are "quality calories"

    Are you sure it was "eat at a deficit" they were saying was stupid, and not "counting calories"?

    If it really was "eat at a deficit" that they think is stupid, then the only stupid thing here is their comment. If it's "counting calories," then I'd still think the remark may have been a little rude, but they'd have a point. Paleo makes it easier to lose weight without counting calories.

    However, it can't magically make you lose weight while eating at or above maintenance. Sorry, biology doesn't work that way. (In fact, if you go by the mantra that it's not what you eat, it's what you absorb, it's the opposite that would be more likely - you'd be more likely to gain when eating at or slightly below maintenance, because you'd be better able to absorb the calories.) It's entirely possible that your metabolism would be different enough from the calculators that you could lose while "eating at maintenance," but that more likely means that your actual maintenance is higher than calculated (either due to food calorie errors or due to metabolism number differences)...but you'd need to track your calories to have that one happen.

    That said, counting calories isn't required for weight loss, but neither is it a sin to do so while following Paleo. If you want to track and it doesn't cause you psychological issues (it makes me neurotic and obsessive), then go for it.
  • Are you sure it was "eat at a deficit" they were saying was stupid, and not "counting calories"?
    It was both, one person's exact words were "Counting calories to eat at a deficit is stupid. Just eat well and you'll BE well." And while that may be true in terms of overall health, I still have pounds to lose to be at a healthy weight and as much as I care about being healthy...part of that to me is being at a good weight.
    However, it can't magically make you lose weight while eating at or above maintenance. Sorry, biology doesn't work that way.
    That's what I thought lol, but then when I have people telling me "not to worry about it" I started questioning things :P...even moreso when these people are completely ripped and attribute it all to primal eat/working out.
    That said, counting calories isn't required for weight loss, but neither is it a sin to do so while following Paleo. If you want to track and it doesn't cause you psychological issues (it makes me neurotic and obsessive), then go for it.
    I think I would get completely neurotic if I was weighing stuff and being sure I used "exactly 1/4c" of something...but I have taken nutrition courses and know what a portion of something looks like so generally speaking I just eyeball it and give myself a lower calorie "goal" to give room for error :). The last thing I want to do is spend every day stressing about calories...that's no fun!
  • Howbouto
    Howbouto Posts: 2,121 Member
    Are you sure it was "eat at a deficit" they were saying was stupid, and not "counting calories"?
    It was both, one person's exact words were "Counting calories to eat at a deficit is stupid. Just eat well and you'll BE well." And while that may be true in terms of overall health, I still have pounds to lose to be at a healthy weight and as much as I care about being healthy...part of that to me is being at a good weight.
  • Howbouto
    Howbouto Posts: 2,121 Member
    ^^^ I couldn't get the quotes to work right!!!




    Ok before I say this I want to say I count calories and it helps me stay on track and encourages me to eat proper healthy food.

    But overall, counting calories is silly. It is impossible to precisely know the amount of calories in food or the amount we are burning each day. Let me put it in mathematically terms. Say you have a 1% error rate in calories, so in a 2000 calorie diet you are off by 20 calories. No big deal right? Lets look at that 20 calories over time.

    +20 calories a day over a year a 2 pound gain (still not that big of deal but a gain no less)
    +20 calories a day over 5 years is a 10 pound gain
    +20 calories a day over 10 years is a 20 pound gain
    +20 calories a day over 50 years is a 101 pound gain.

    Obvisously there are days when the error rate would favor the other direction.

    IMHO The whole point of primal/paleo is about allowing your bodies regulatory systems do their job by supplying it with the food its meant to have. In other words, keeping blood sugar even to control insulin release to discourage fat storage, in turn your body become more sensitive and better at producing leptin (your full hormone) and slows the production of the gherlin (your I'm hungry hormone).

    Just my 2 cents...
  • ShannonKirton
    ShannonKirton Posts: 304 Member
    When I first went paleo I still counted my calories and logged every day. It was my way of accounting what I ate. I was also greatly concerned with carbs so I used to watch those like a hawk! Since then (July) I have only now decided that I'm comfortable enough to not log and relax on the carbs due to what I know now. I'm not as concerned now as I once was due to the fact that I get a lot of exercise and I know what my body needs and calls for.

    Some days I eat a lot and other I eat next to nothing, but it all depends on how I'm feeling. I hope you can get back into the swing of things soon. Any maybe one day, you could open up your own paleo/primal organic food store or cafe. I wish I had one here in Barbados!!
  • Dragonwolf
    Dragonwolf Posts: 5,600 Member
    Are you sure it was "eat at a deficit" they were saying was stupid, and not "counting calories"?
    It was both, one person's exact words were "Counting calories to eat at a deficit is stupid. Just eat well and you'll BE well." And while that may be true in terms of overall health, I still have pounds to lose to be at a healthy weight and as much as I care about being healthy...part of that to me is being at a good weight.
    However, it can't magically make you lose weight while eating at or above maintenance. Sorry, biology doesn't work that way.
    That's what I thought lol, but then when I have people telling me "not to worry about it" I started questioning things :P...even moreso when these people are completely ripped and attribute it all to primal eat/working out.
    [/quote]

    Your friend is right, in a sense. When the body is working properly, it should be able to self-regulate, and you shouldn't have to worry about counting calories to lose weight. After all, for the entirety of human history until a few decades ago, people stayed within a normal weight range naturally, without counting calories. You shouldn't have to count calories (or do the whole "weigh every gram" thing) in order to eat at a deficit and lose weight.

    I've been on MFP for a few years now, and until last year, I had been trying to lose weight basically the "calories in, calories out" way. Supposedly, macros shouldn't matter, and I'd be able to lose weight. I hadn't messed with MFP's macro settings except maybe to increase protein, but neither did I really try to be within them much. I just tried to hit my protein goal and let what would be, be.

    At the end of the day, every single day, I'd be at my calorie maximum (which wasn't small - around 2000) and wanted to gnaw my arm off. And worse? I wasn't losing weight (or inches).

    Several years ago, I was diagnosed with PCOS, but hadn't been on Metformin for quite some time, so I went to my doctor to see about running the tests again and maybe going back on it. She basically laughed me out of the office and told me I was just eating too much, and that I should be eating around 1600. Hahaha...no.

    I was starving at the 2000+ MFP and the TDEE methods were giving me, there was no way in hell that I'd be able to cut out another 500 calories.

    Enter the Primal Blueprint and LC/HF. I decided to try it, and started eating more fat and fewer carbs. Even without going full keto, or even what some would consider "low carb" (at the time, I think I was at a goal maximum of around 125g of carbs), it was far easier for me to eat far less. Not only was I able to be comfortable on the doctor's recommendation of 1600, there were days were I struggled to eat that much, and would, if left to my own devices, only eat about half that. Suddenly, 1600 became an "eat this much" instead of "eat this little" goal.

    One of the things I did at the beginning was keep track so that I could learn to gauge how much I was eating, because it felt like I'd eating something like 3000 calories or something crazy, but when I put it into MFP, it'd come out to be more like 1000. Later on, I started doing it to track carbs to try to bring them down under 75-100g.

    Now, (in part with the help of Metformin, at the moment, due to the PCOS and what it's done to my endocrine system) I'm losing weight without tracking, because I'm listening to my body and eating Primally.
  • Fit_in_Folsom
    Fit_in_Folsom Posts: 220 Member
    I am new to this group and MFP, but have done Paleo on/off for the last year. I started a year ago by doing the Whole30, and completed the program for 33 days. I agree with everything people have said above. It is about eating quality food and not counting cals. I got very sick last year and went to an integrative doctor that is actually an MD, and she told me to get back on the Paleo style. I am now getting my butt back in gear.... Down 5lbs, 15 more to go, and a life ahead to make change :)

    Anyone looking for encouragement, hit me up. I am on day 4 of doing a short version of Whole30....