Finally... My Labs/Panels!!!

collegefbfan
collegefbfan Posts: 346 Member
edited November 13 in Social Groups
So finally got results.
May 2016
Blood pressure 128 over 90
Triglycerides 239
HDL 38
Glucose 99

November 2016
Blood pressure 114 over 82
Triglycerides 116
HDL 42
Glucose 78

Total cholesterol was up though. It was 196 in May. Now it is 223.

How is all this? Total cholesterol, should I be worried?

Replies

  • idocdlw
    idocdlw Posts: 208 Member
    edited November 2016
    Nice work! Don't obsess over the increase in your total cholesterol too much. Be more attentive to your cholesterol ratio.

    Your cholesterol ratio is calculated by dividing your total cholesterol by your HDL cholesterol. The higher the number, the higher your risk of atherosclerosis and heart disease. Your ratio is not alarmingly high but could certainly be improved.

    While your total cholesterol has gone up, so has your HDL which is good. Unfortunately, you also have a slight increase in your ratio (average is 4.5...we should all aim for 4.5 and preferably lower). Increased physical activity will raise your HDL. That is what is important...keeping your HDL high while keeping your LDL and triglycerides low. Eliminating all trans fats, processed (fake) foods and alcohol will help lower LDL and triglycerides. (Alcohol can also be another contributor to high triglycerides...I have experienced this personally...I will never, ever, ever give up my wine...but when I am consuming more heavily, my triglycerides are always higher.)

    I have always had very high total cholesterol (250-275) but my HDL is always between 100-110 and my LDL is always on the low end of normal, so there is no way any practitioner would even consider treating my "high cholesterol". I had to laugh because I am now cared for by the VA. My provider loves to see me because I am the rare VA patient who is not a "train wreck"...she is always incredulous when she sees my HDL levels and claims mine are the highest she has ever seen.

    Maybe I am just incredibly lucky genetically. I am quite active but I know a lot of people who are much more active than me whose ratios are poorer.

    Keep up the good work!! :smiley:
  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    Those are fantastic numbers! Even total cholesterol. Low cholesterol isn't actually the "good" thing they would like us to believe it is.
  • RalfLott
    RalfLott Posts: 5,036 Member
    Looks pretty good to me. Here are a couple thoughts.....

    Did you get an A1c test or, if not, do you frequently test your BG? A single fasting blood glucose sample doesn't tell you a lot, though yours clearly improved.

    It might also be worthwhile to test Apo-lipoproteins and/or sub-particles of LDL, so you've got a baseline for future reference.

    Also - your lipid profile will stabilize when you're finished with the weight-loss phase and have moved into maintenance; LDLs in particular can climb a bit as you keto-adapt and shed weight.
  • KetoGirl83
    KetoGirl83 Posts: 546 Member
    Great results!

    Re cholesterol, do you know Jimmy Moore's book?
    https://amazon.co.uk/Cholesterol-Clarity-What-Wrong-Numbers/dp/1936608383/

    ::flowerforyou::
  • collegefbfan
    collegefbfan Posts: 346 Member
    I use a meter for ketones and blood glucose. I have checked blood glucose probably 5 times in last 3 months. It has always been fine. Ketones in urine numbered 40 the day they tested urine.
  • kpk54
    kpk54 Posts: 4,474 Member
    Is there a need for non diabetic folks to have A1c or BG checked? Are they standard on annual physicals? They're not something I've ever concerned myself with. I didn't have trouble losing my excess weight, never seemed to experience any symptoms of high/low BG, always figured I gained weight simply because I ate far more than needed to expect weight maintenance.
  • tcunbeliever
    tcunbeliever Posts: 8,219 Member
    They always run A1C when I go to the dr, and I am not diabetic - it seems to be a standard test for my provider...they have only done fasting BG when I was pregnant though.
  • RalfLott
    RalfLott Posts: 5,036 Member
    kpk54 wrote: »
    Is there a need for non diabetic folks to have A1c or BG checked? Are they standard on annual physicals? They're not something I've ever concerned myself with. I didn't have trouble losing my excess weight, never seemed to experience any symptoms of high/low BG, always figured I gained weight simply because I ate far more than needed to expect weight maintenance.

    Considering occasional fasting glucose levels don't tell you much if they're not elevated, how would you know if you're diabetic or not? :o

    There's no harm in having the information, whether it reveals something of concern or simply gives you a baseline for future reference.

    It's a pretty common test, and cheap. (If you don't want your employer/insurance carrier to know, you can even get a self-test kit for about $25.)

    I sure do wish I'd gotten one earlier in the game! :s
  • cstehansen
    cstehansen Posts: 1,984 Member
    kpk54 wrote: »
    Is there a need for non diabetic folks to have A1c or BG checked? Are they standard on annual physicals? They're not something I've ever concerned myself with. I didn't have trouble losing my excess weight, never seemed to experience any symptoms of high/low BG, always figured I gained weight simply because I ate far more than needed to expect weight maintenance.

    Given the diabetes epidemic we have, this is a better safe than sorry test IMO. It is good to know it so you can see if a trend develops in the wrong direction from physical to physical.
  • collegefbfan
    collegefbfan Posts: 346 Member
    I always wanted to know. Just scared of my pat ways of eating tons of crap. So, like @cstehansen said. Better safe than sorry.
This discussion has been closed.