Question About Eating Fat

debodom1962
debodom1962 Posts: 310 Member
edited November 20 in Social Groups
I grew up in the age of low fat everything so trying to wrap my head around eating 75% fat is really difficult. I'm doing it and have lost close to 4 lbs in a week. However I have a question that I can't seem to find the answer to. I am at approximately 42% body fat. I had it tested in an air pod last year so it is fairly accurate. It may be a little less now since I've lost some weight but still close enough. So how does my body burn the stored fat if I'm eating about 80-100 grams of fat a day. I'm trying to make sure I eat plenty of healthy fat and not just live on cheese, nuts, and bacon.
«1

Replies

  • debodom1962
    debodom1962 Posts: 310 Member
    @RalfLott what is strategic energy reserve? And in your opinion, with the fat that is stored already in my body, what should I be eating. Right now my calories are set at 1298, fat at 101g, carbs at 20g and protein at 65g.
  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    75% fat is what your body will burn from TDEE. Not how much you eat. You take your calorie deficit from the fat. Often leaving a fat ratio closer to 60%
    5a7a63sy062d.jpg
  • debodom1962
    debodom1962 Posts: 310 Member
    @RalfLott I did get macros etc from those calculators. Not one of them gave me the same reading so I just went with the lowest one. I'll get the book you recommended and try and look at the videos. Sometimes that stuff gets so scientific that I can't understand it all. Thank you for the suggestions.
  • tayusuki
    tayusuki Posts: 194 Member
    Seeing this post is actually confusing me.

    Does this mean you reduce your caloric intake more? Does this mean you adjust your macros for more protein?
  • debodom1962
    debodom1962 Posts: 310 Member
    edited August 2017
    @tayusuki right? I was confused before, I am moreso now. Now I don't know if I'm losing weight because my calories are super low (CICO) or because I'm eating high fat. They need to make a "keto for dummies" and simplify it.
  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    Here's another example I like.
    It shows a 1:1 ratio in grams for protein and fat for weight loss and a 2:1 ratio for maintenance.

    twsr7s800buv.jpg
  • kpk54
    kpk54 Posts: 4,474 Member
    You're losing weight because your eating lower calories than you did before. You're hopefully not hungry because the low carb high fat combination is keeping you satiated allowing you to more easily adhere to that deficit.

    I personally wouldn't pay much attention to that graph. While it is 100% true, in my opinion, MFP does not use TDEE and it is just something else to add to the confusion. It doesn't mean to eat fewer calories than your current deficit set by you and mfp and it doesn't mean to eat less fat. All it is saying is that what you are not eating because of a deficit, is coming from your body fat. That's what you want to occur.
  • RalfLott
    RalfLott Posts: 5,036 Member
    @RalfLott I did get macros etc from those calculators. Not one of them gave me the same reading so I just went with the lowest one. I'll get the book you recommended and try and look at the videos. Sometimes that stuff gets so scientific that I can't understand it all. Thank you for the suggestions.

    I know it can be confusing! It will all make a lot more sense after you've been at it for a while. Meanwhile, New Atkins is a simplified intro to keto for people who are interested in low-carb diets but don't have a scientific background.

    Phinney and Volek also have intro videos at the JumpstartMD YouTube channel. They're divided into very short segments by topic.

    If you restrict your carbs, your body will look to fat as a fuel source. The more fat you eat, the less your body will burn from your body fat.

    Some of us (uh, me... ) have experienced muscle loss from starting keto without enough protein. My goal weight is 140, and I now eat around 110g of protein per day.



  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    I know MFP doesn't use TDEE. But it's not difficult to get a fair estimate. Every single one of those calculators gives you your TDEE.
    YOU JUST DO THE MATH YOURSELF.
    Don't use MFP's generic caloric deficit. If you're using a keto macro calculator you already aren't anyway. Once you know your TDEE based on the calculators already mentioned, subtract whatever calorie deficit you want but take those calories from the fat only.
    It's really not difficult at all.
  • kpk54
    kpk54 Posts: 4,474 Member
    edited August 2017
    Here's another example I like.
    It shows a 1:1 ratio in grams for protein and fat for weight loss and a 2:1 ratio for maintenance.

    twsr7s800buv.jpg

    It looks like 2:1 for fat loss and 1:1 for maintenance.
  • debodom1962
    debodom1962 Posts: 310 Member
    @Sunny_Bunny_ still totally confused. What is TDEE? And the numbers I originally posted came from one of the calculators mentioned. I'll go back and try again, but I tried different ones and none of them gave me the same reading.

    @kpk54 most likely I am losing weight because of the decrease in calories and most definitely the decrease in sugar and white products. I don't look so puffy and my belly is shrinking. But all this fat scares me.

    @RalfLott that last post. That I understand lol. Thank you. That answered my question pretty good. So I'll decrease my fat some and increase my protein more and see what happens.

    I just happen to have the New Atkins For A New You on my bookshelf so I'll start reading through it and see if I can make a little sense of this. I may have more questions.

    Thank you for trying to help me everyone. I really want to succeed at this for health reasons. I am T2D (diet controlled) autoimmune Hashimoto's, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, IBS, and just general joint inflammation overall. After 10 days, I will say I do not feel as inflamed and I trying to keep dairy to a minimum to further help that.

  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    kpk54 wrote: »
    Here's another example I like.
    It shows a 1:1 ratio in grams for protein and fat for weight loss and a 2:1 ratio for maintenance.

    twsr7s800buv.jpg

    It looks like 2:1 for fat loss and 1:1 for maintenance.

    My mistake. 2 parts protein to 1 part fat is correct in fat loss mode. Equal parts for maintenance
  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    There are different ways you can set this up for fat loss.
    You can choose to be meticulous and figure every calorie and gram using calculators and macro percentages as I detailed above or you can use the simpler 2:1 ratio and limit carbs to whatever you want below 50g.
    In a Chris Masterjohn video shared on another link he suggests eating 1g of protein per pound of ideal body weight.

    How about this.
    If MFP gives you a 1200 calorie goal, set carbs to 30g, protein to 120g and fat to whatever you have left.
    It doesn't get simpler than that
  • RhiannonBecks
    RhiannonBecks Posts: 189 Member
    baconslave wrote: »
    Here's a different way of looking at it.

    TDEE is Total Daily Energy Expenditure. Which is how much your body burns every day to run your organs, and your work, AND your exercise. Total calorie burn for your daily life. Most keto calcs have this. Find it. Generally 500cal deficit will get you (supposedly) about a lb per week loss. 250cal deficit will get you a half pound. Find that TDEE figure and subtract your deficit of choice. That is your daily intake.
    With this number make your carbs, protein, fat this:
    • Carbs are a ceiling in grams.
    • Protein is a range (based on your height/weight/activity level.
    • Fill the rest of your calories with fat.

    So the base of what you eat is a carb limit and a protein range (so you don't lose as much muscle-all weightloss will take some, this isn't specific to keto). What's left is fat.

    We'll do my TDEE based upon ankerl.


    8qufwre1j93k.png


    So the section in red shows my TDEE. If I want to lose 1lb per week, I subtract 500cal from it. What's this 500 come from? Supposedly 3500cal deficit is what it takes to lose a pound. Divide that by the days of the week, you get 500cal deficit per day. Anyway,
    So according to what I inputed into the calc, if I want to lose 1 pound per week, I need to calculate my macros based upon a calorie intake of 1568 cal which is 50g carbs, 100g protein (or a little higher. It's ok to go a little over), and 106g fat.
    If I do eat more protein, I'll eat a bit less fat to compensate.

    Of course, every 10 or 15lb, you need to recalculate the TDEE, as smaller bodies need fewer calories over time.
    HTH.


    I think this may have helped me as well, so thank you for breaking it down like this!

    I do have a question based on this info though; my TDEE is calculated at 1807. ( I am hoping to lose the remaining 27# to goal). If I had MFP set at 2# loss, keeping what you said in mind, id be eating 807 cals a day based on that note of 500 cal deficit for every pound desired to lose.

    Now I'm clearly not going to function on 807 cals a day, regardless of my fat intake I'd think.

    So my question is this, Should I adjust my goals then, is 1# per week I more realistic with the amount I want to lose? Which brings me back to around 1307 cals a day. MFP calculated 1200 cals for me, so just adjust my own macros based on the 1307 and I should still see a deficit- right?......

    Maybe I am just talking out loud trying to process. I have read a lot of things and just trying to make it simple as possible for longevity.

    _Current plan per MFP: 1200 cals, Carbs %5/ 15 g,( I still hit 20 right around 20 or less some days), Fat 75% /100 g, and Protein 20%/60g. I walk 5-6 days a week for a total of about 5-6 miles daily.
  • debodom1962
    debodom1962 Posts: 310 Member
    @baconslave you rock. That I understood almost 100%
    @Sunny_Bunny_ yes that made it much simpler lol.

    Do you remember Charlie Brown when his parents would speak and all you heard was "waa waa waa". That's what my brain has always heard if it pertains to science, calculations etc. I'm a math whiz and I read everything I can get my hands on, but science stuff, lost. Thank you for breaking it down!
  • Cadori
    Cadori Posts: 4,810 Member
    baconslave wrote: »
    Here's a different way of looking at it.

    TDEE is Total Daily Energy Expenditure. Which is how much your body burns every day to run your organs, and your work, AND your exercise. Total calorie burn for your daily life. Most keto calcs have this. Find it. Generally 500cal deficit will get you (supposedly) about a lb per week loss. 250cal deficit will get you a half pound. Find that TDEE figure and subtract your deficit of choice. That is your daily intake.
    With this number make your carbs, protein, fat this:
    • Carbs are a ceiling in grams.
    • Protein is a range (based on your height/weight/activity level.
    • Fill the rest of your calories with fat.

    So the base of what you eat is a carb limit and a protein range (so you don't lose as much muscle-all weightloss will take some, this isn't specific to keto). What's left is fat.

    We'll do my TDEE based upon ankerl.


    8qufwre1j93k.png


    So the section in red shows my TDEE. If I want to lose 1lb per week, I subtract 500cal from it. What's this 500 come from? Supposedly 3500cal deficit is what it takes to lose a pound. Divide that by the days of the week, you get 500cal deficit per day. Anyway,
    So according to what I inputed into the calc, if I want to lose 1 pound per week, I need to calculate my macros based upon a calorie intake of 1568 cal which is 50g carbs, 100g protein (or a little higher. It's ok to go a little over), and 106g fat.
    If I do eat more protein, I'll eat a bit less fat to compensate.

    Of course, every 10 or 15lb, you need to recalculate the TDEE, as smaller bodies need fewer calories over time.
    HTH.


    I think this may have helped me as well, so thank you for breaking it down like this!

    I do have a question based on this info though; my TDEE is calculated at 1807. ( I am hoping to lose the remaining 27# to goal). If I had MFP set at 2# loss, keeping what you said in mind, id be eating 807 cals a day based on that note of 500 cal deficit for every pound desired to lose.

    Now I'm clearly not going to function on 807 cals a day, regardless of my fat intake I'd think.

    So my question is this, Should I adjust my goals then, is 1# per week I more realistic with the amount I want to lose? Which brings me back to around 1307 cals a day. MFP calculated 1200 cals for me, so just adjust my own macros based on the 1307 and I should still see a deficit- right?......

    Maybe I am just talking out loud trying to process. I have read a lot of things and just trying to make it simple as possible for longevity.

    _Current plan per MFP: 1200 cals, Carbs %5/ 15 g,( I still hit 20 right around 20 or less some days), Fat 75% /100 g, and Protein 20%/60g. I walk 5-6 days a week for a total of about 5-6 miles daily.

    With "only" (I realize this is subjective) 27# to go, 1 pound/week is the maximum I would aim to lose. and after losing 7-12 of that, .5lb/week would be my maximum.
  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    I'm having trouble with MFP allowing me to insert the photos in line with my text so I had to type this in notes and screen capture it. But I hope this helps make it the most clear and how to use MFP to do it easily.

    o0yuj0uq1oa6.png
  • Dragonwolf
    Dragonwolf Posts: 5,600 Member
    @tayusuki right? I was confused before, I am moreso now. Now I don't know if I'm losing weight because my calories are super low (CICO) or because I'm eating high fat. They need to make a "keto for dummies" and simplify it.

    This is why I don't like the way Phinney explains it. It may make sense to some, but IME, it's more confusing than it needs to be.

    You burn X amount of calories per day, so to lose weight at a rate of 1lb per week, you take in X-500 calories per day, most of that 500 calorie reduction should come from carbs and/or fat, because your protein needs are based on your lean mass.

    You then already have the "burn body fat" part taken care of, because you're eating a caloric deficit. This happens (theoretically, at least) regardless of what your intake proportions are.

    But where do the ratios come from? The ones "everyone on keto knows" come from the average maintenance calories. For your own personal ratios, unless you're doing it for seizure control or other medical purpose that requires a certain ratio, you find it by:

    1. Determining your upper limit for carbs. (Ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)
    2. Determining your protein need. (Goal, try to hit it pretty closely, it's okay to go over a little)
    3. Filling the remainder of your caloric goal with fat. (Filler and ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)

    That gets you your general intake ratio (though keep in mind that you don't have to pour oil down your throat just to get that amount of fat in; enjoy your full fat foods and fatty meats, and don't fret if you're not hungry and fall short a bit).
  • RalfLott
    RalfLott Posts: 5,036 Member
    Dragonwolf wrote: »
    This is why I don't like the way Phinney explains it. It may make sense to some, but IME, it's more confusing than it needs to be.

    For your own personal ratios, unless you're doing it for seizure control or other medical purpose that requires a certain ratio, you find it by:

    1. Determining your upper limit for carbs. (Ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)
    2. Determining your protein need. (Goal, try to hit it pretty closely, it's okay to go over a little)
    3. Filling the remainder of your caloric goal with fat. (Filler and ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)

    Dang. That sounds exactly like what I thought Phinney said. I must have missed something ... :s
  • baconslave
    baconslave Posts: 7,021 Member
    edited August 2017
    baconslave wrote: »
    Here's a different way of looking at it.

    TDEE is Total Daily Energy Expenditure. Which is how much your body burns every day to run your organs, and your work, AND your exercise. Total calorie burn for your daily life. Most keto calcs have this. Find it. Generally 500cal deficit will get you (supposedly) about a lb per week loss. 250cal deficit will get you a half pound. Find that TDEE figure and subtract your deficit of choice. That is your daily intake.
    With this number make your carbs, protein, fat this:
    • Carbs are a ceiling in grams.
    • Protein is a range (based on your height/weight/activity level.
    • Fill the rest of your calories with fat.

    So the base of what you eat is a carb limit and a protein range (so you don't lose as much muscle-all weightloss will take some, this isn't specific to keto). What's left is fat.

    We'll do my TDEE based upon ankerl.


    8qufwre1j93k.png


    So the section in red shows my TDEE. If I want to lose 1lb per week, I subtract 500cal from it. What's this 500 come from? Supposedly 3500cal deficit is what it takes to lose a pound. Divide that by the days of the week, you get 500cal deficit per day. Anyway,
    So according to what I inputed into the calc, if I want to lose 1 pound per week, I need to calculate my macros based upon a calorie intake of 1568 cal which is 50g carbs, 100g protein (or a little higher. It's ok to go a little over), and 106g fat.
    If I do eat more protein, I'll eat a bit less fat to compensate.

    Of course, every 10 or 15lb, you need to recalculate the TDEE, as smaller bodies need fewer calories over time.
    HTH.


    I think this may have helped me as well, so thank you for breaking it down like this!

    I do have a question based on this info though; my TDEE is calculated at 1807. ( I am hoping to lose the remaining 27# to goal). If I had MFP set at 2# loss, keeping what you said in mind, id be eating 807 cals a day based on that note of 500 cal deficit for every pound desired to lose.

    Now I'm clearly not going to function on 807 cals a day, regardless of my fat intake I'd think.

    So my question is this, Should I adjust my goals then, is 1# per week I more realistic with the amount I want to lose? Which brings me back to around 1307 cals a day. MFP calculated 1200 cals for me, so just adjust my own macros based on the 1307 and I should still see a deficit- right?......

    Maybe I am just talking out loud trying to process. I have read a lot of things and just trying to make it simple as possible for longevity.

    _Current plan per MFP: 1200 cals, Carbs %5/ 15 g,( I still hit 20 right around 20 or less some days), Fat 75% /100 g, and Protein 20%/60g. I walk 5-6 days a week for a total of about 5-6 miles daily.


    1lb per week is more reasonable to expect. Maybe even 3/4 to half a pound. The less you have to lose, the smaller your TDEE. Stuff like 800cal is setting yourself up to fail for sure. If I wanted to lose 2lb per week, I have 15lb to lose, then I'd have to eat 1000cal. Ain't no way in Hades!

    Take your TDEE. Subtract 500. That will be 1lb per week loss (possibly).

    So you'd eat 1307, making your macros calculations in grams. Forget the percents. Do the grams. There's no reason on earth why you need to eat less than 20g carbs, unless you find that to be personally preferable for some reason. A lot of people can actually stay in ketosis up to 50g.
    Your protein should match your height/weight/activity level. Your protein should be .8 to 1.2 grams per kg of lean body mass, higher in the range if you exercise frequently. The keto calculators can help you with that.
    The rest is fat in grams.
    Percents are bullhockey and inaccurate since it changes for each person. Grams grams grams.

    The percents are based on TDEE for maintaining, your body fat is making up the difference in deficit. When it's maintenance time, then your fat intake will look more like 65 or 70% because your body fat is through the floor and you don't need to draw from it any more but you need calories so fat is where it's at to fill the gap in energy.

    Remember that TDEE is a calculation. It isn't gospel. You may lose more or less, because you body doesn't care about a calculator's output. We are all different organisms. Your TDEE in reality may be higher or lower. If you are losing too slow, it might be lower than the calculation. So after 4-6 weeks you might need to lower it. If you are losing too fast, or starving to death, then your TDEE is higher and you can add 100cal and try that.

    Did that help?
  • baconslave
    baconslave Posts: 7,021 Member
    @baconslave you rock. That I understood almost 100%
    @Sunny_Bunny_ yes that made it much simpler lol.

    Do you remember Charlie Brown when his parents would speak and all you heard was "waa waa waa". That's what my brain has always heard if it pertains to science, calculations etc. I'm a math whiz and I read everything I can get my hands on, but science stuff, lost. Thank you for breaking it down!

    Good.
    I knew the Technical Writing certification classes would help me some day. :wink:
  • RhiannonBecks
    RhiannonBecks Posts: 189 Member
    @baconslave Yes, yes and yaaaaaas. Totally Helps, I will just need to do a bit of math now on the grams instead of just doing the %.

    I would never do 800 calories, regardless of what any calculator said, unless it was a medically supervised diet, besides, I may crumble under pressure within the first day if I knew I was restricting that much.

    I will change my goal to 1# per week, I have lost about 7# since re-starting, which assuming is water weight. But the past 4 days ish I haven't moved even an ounce on the scale (really just for tracking purposes I weigh daily).

    I haven't been hungry so I don't that will be an issue; in fact, it has been somewhat of a struggle to even hit that 1200 cals. The "under 20 grams" Is NET carbs if I didn't mention, and only bc the way the day worked out food wise. I think 14- 16 was the lowest I had hit. But by no means was it intentional.

    I will up my calories and adjust, go from there and see if in 4 weeks anything changes.

    I really cant thank you enough for explaining it like a 5 year old for me, lol!
  • baconslave
    baconslave Posts: 7,021 Member
    @baconslave Yes, yes and yaaaaaas. Totally Helps, I will just need to do a bit of math now on the grams instead of just doing the %.

    I would never do 800 calories, regardless of what any calculator said, unless it was a medically supervised diet, besides, I may crumble under pressure within the first day if I knew I was restricting that much.

    I will change my goal to 1# per week, I have lost about 7# since re-starting, which assuming is water weight. But the past 4 days ish I haven't moved even an ounce on the scale (really just for tracking purposes I weigh daily).

    I haven't been hungry so I don't that will be an issue; in fact, it has been somewhat of a struggle to even hit that 1200 cals. The "under 20 grams" Is NET carbs if I didn't mention, and only bc the way the day worked out food wise. I think 14- 16 was the lowest I had hit. But by no means was it intentional.

    I will up my calories and adjust, go from there and see if in 4 weeks anything changes.

    I really cant thank you enough for explaining it like a 5 year old for me, lol!

    Ah...net carbs then. That makes sense.
    I'm pretty sure that level is way higher than a 5-year-old. I just know how to distill everything down to short steps, baring them down to the bones, and so, then, we can understand the "meat" once we get that established. There's definitely a learning curve in all this mathness and details.
  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    I agree with @Dragonwolf
    I only make this point for those specifically trying to use the 5/20/75 ratios. That's fine, but know what you're doing is all I'm saying.
    They are constantly applied incorrectly.

    If someone really wants that macro split. This is how to do it. As described above.

  • Sunny_Bunny_
    Sunny_Bunny_ Posts: 7,140 Member
    RalfLott wrote: »
    Dragonwolf wrote: »
    This is why I don't like the way Phinney explains it. It may make sense to some, but IME, it's more confusing than it needs to be.

    For your own personal ratios, unless you're doing it for seizure control or other medical purpose that requires a certain ratio, you find it by:

    1. Determining your upper limit for carbs. (Ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)
    2. Determining your protein need. (Goal, try to hit it pretty closely, it's okay to go over a little)
    3. Filling the remainder of your caloric goal with fat. (Filler and ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)

    Dang. That sounds exactly like what I thought Phinney said. I must have missed something ... :s

    I agree. This is exactly what I get from the Phinney graph too
  • Dragonwolf
    Dragonwolf Posts: 5,600 Member
    RalfLott wrote: »
    Dragonwolf wrote: »
    This is why I don't like the way Phinney explains it. It may make sense to some, but IME, it's more confusing than it needs to be.

    For your own personal ratios, unless you're doing it for seizure control or other medical purpose that requires a certain ratio, you find it by:

    1. Determining your upper limit for carbs. (Ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)
    2. Determining your protein need. (Goal, try to hit it pretty closely, it's okay to go over a little)
    3. Filling the remainder of your caloric goal with fat. (Filler and ceiling, try not to go over, don't go out of your way to hit it)

    Dang. That sounds exactly like what I thought Phinney said. I must have missed something ... :s

    Like I said, it makes sense to some people. Just be aware that not everyone understands it when presented the way he does, even if it seems obvious to you.

    To me, including the "burned body fat" part into conversations for newbies, especially on places like here on MFP, where there's a high chance of the information from the two sources being juxtaposed onto one another, it just adds noise to things, as evidenced by the initial responses to your Phinney post.
This discussion has been closed.